An Anti-CD3 Antibody, Teplizumab, in Relatives at Risk for Type 1 Diabetes.

BACKGROUND Type 1 diabetes is a chronic autoimmune disease that leads to destruction of insulin-producing beta cells and dependence on exogenous insulin for survival. Some interventions have delayed the loss of insulin production in patients with type 1 diabetes, but interventions that might affect clinical progression before diagnosis are needed. METHODS We conducted a phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of teplizumab (an Fc receptor-nonbinding anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody) involving relatives of patients with type 1 diabetes who did not have diabetes but were at high risk for development of clinical disease. Patients were randomly assigned to a single 14-day course of teplizumab or placebo, and follow-up for progression to clinical type 1 diabetes was performed with the use of oral glucose-tolerance tests at 6-month intervals. RESULTS A total of 76 participants (55 [72%] of whom were ≤18 years of age) underwent randomization - 44 to the teplizumab group and 32 to the placebo group. The median time to the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes was 48.4 months in the teplizumab group and 24.4 months in the placebo group; the disease was diagnosed in 19 (43%) of the participants who received teplizumab and in 23 (72%) of those who received placebo. The hazard ratio for the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (teplizumab vs. placebo) was 0.41 (95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.78; P = 0.006 by adjusted Cox proportional-hazards model). The annualized rates of diagnosis of diabetes were 14.9% per year in the teplizumab group and 35.9% per year in the placebo group. There were expected adverse events of rash and transient lymphopenia. TIGIT+KLRG1+CD8+ T cells were more common in the teplizumab group than in the placebo group. Among the participants who were HLA-DR3-negative, HLA-DR4-positive, or anti-zinc transporter 8 antibody-negative, fewer participants in the teplizumab group than in the placebo group had diabetes diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS Teplizumab delayed progression to clinical type 1 diabetes in high-risk participants. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01030861.).

[1]  G. Ang Age of onset of diabetes and all-cause mortality , 2020, World journal of diabetes.

[2]  J. Carballido,et al.  The Emerging Jamboree of Transformative Therapies for Autoimmune Diseases , 2020, Frontiers in Immunology.

[3]  B. Shields,et al.  Studies of insulin and proinsulin in pancreas and serum support the existence of aetiopathological endotypes of type 1 diabetes associated with age at diagnosis , 2020, Diabetologia.

[4]  R. Schiaffini,et al.  Immunotherapy Strategies for the Prevention and Treatment of Distinct Stages of Type 1 Diabetes: An Overview , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[5]  Shannon K. Boi,et al.  Beta cell-specific CD8+ T cells maintain stem-cell memory-associated epigenetic programs during type 1 diabetes , 2020, Nature Immunology.

[6]  M. Peakman,et al.  The challenge of modulating β-cell autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes. , 2019, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[7]  W. Hagopian,et al.  Treatment of type 1 diabetes with teplizumab: clinical and immunological follow-up after 7 years from diagnosis , 2018, Diabetologia.

[8]  A. Hattersley,et al.  Excess mortality and cardiovascular disease in young adults with type 1 diabetes in relation to age at onset: a nationwide, register-based cohort study , 2018, The Lancet.

[9]  P. Bingley,et al.  Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet: A Multifaceted Approach to Bringing Disease-Modifying Therapy to Clinical Use in Type 1 Diabetes , 2018, Diabetes Care.

[10]  P. Linsley,et al.  Remodeling T cell compartments during anti-CD3 immunotherapy of type 1 diabetes. , 2017, Cellular immunology.

[11]  James A. Eddy,et al.  Partial exhaustion of CD8 T cells and clinical response to teplizumab in new-onset type 1 diabetes , 2016, Science Immunology.

[12]  C. Cotsapas,et al.  Changes in T‐cell subsets identify responders to FcR‐nonbinding anti‐CD3 mAb (teplizumab) in patients with type 1 diabetes , 2016, European journal of immunology.

[13]  A. Dreher Modeling Survival Data Extending The Cox Model , 2016 .

[14]  Å. Lernmark,et al.  Staging Presymptomatic Type 1 Diabetes: A Scientific Statement of JDRF, the Endocrine Society, and the American Diabetes Association , 2015, Diabetes Care.

[15]  L. Dimeglio,et al.  Defining Pathways for Development of Disease-Modifying Therapies in Children With Type 1 Diabetes: A Consensus Report , 2015, Diabetes Care.

[16]  Paul A. Lyons,et al.  T cell exhaustion, costimulation and clinical outcome in autoimmunity and infection , 2015, Nature.

[17]  David M Maahs,et al.  Current State of Type 1 Diabetes Treatment in the U.S.: Updated Data From the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry , 2015, Diabetes Care.

[18]  J. Krischer,et al.  β cell death and dysfunction during type 1 diabetes development in at-risk individuals. , 2015, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[19]  S. Wild,et al.  Estimated life expectancy in a Scottish cohort with type 1 diabetes, 2008-2010. , 2015, JAMA.

[20]  W. Hagopian,et al.  Teplizumab (Anti-CD3 mAb) Treatment Preserves C-Peptide Responses in Patients With New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes in a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2013, Diabetes.

[21]  W. Hagopian,et al.  Immune intervention for type 1 diabetes, 2012-2013. , 2014, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[22]  C. Cowie,et al.  The prevalence of type 1 diabetes in the United States. , 2013, Epidemiology.

[23]  A. Cooke,et al.  Type 1 diabetes: translating mechanistic observations into effective clinical outcomes , 2013, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[24]  C. Beam,et al.  Fall in C-Peptide During First 2 Years From Diagnosis , 2012, Diabetes.

[25]  R. Flavell,et al.  Teplizumab Induces Human Gut-Tropic Regulatory Cells in Humanized Mice and Patients , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[26]  W. Hagopian,et al.  Teplizumab for treatment of type 1 diabetes (Protégé study): 1-year results from a randomised, placebo-controlled trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[27]  J. Bluestone,et al.  Control of TH17 cells occurs in the Small Intestine , 2011, Nature.

[28]  E John Wherry,et al.  T cell exhaustion , 2011 .

[29]  C. Mathieu,et al.  Transient Epstein-Barr virus reactivation in CD3 monoclonal antibody-treated patients. , 2010, Blood.

[30]  E. Wherry,et al.  Molecular signature of CD8+ T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection. , 2007, Immunity.

[31]  Michel Goldman,et al.  Insulin needs after CD3-antibody therapy in new-onset type 1 diabetes. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  J. Bluestone,et al.  Activation of human T cells by FcR nonbinding anti-CD3 mAb, hOKT3γ1(Ala-Ala) , 2003 .

[33]  J. Bluestone,et al.  Activation of human T cells by FcR nonbinding anti-CD3 mAb, hOKT3gamma1(Ala-Ala). , 2003, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[34]  J. Killestein Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody in new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  L. Chatenoud,et al.  CD3 antibody-induced dominant self tolerance in overtly diabetic NOD mice. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[36]  L. Chatenoud,et al.  Anti-CD3 antibody induces long-term remission of overt autoimmunity in nonobese diabetic mice. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  A. Junker,et al.  Epstein-Barr virus infections following OKT3 treatment. , 1989, Transplantation.

[38]  K. K. Lan,et al.  Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials , 1983 .

[39]  D. Schoenfeld,et al.  Sample-size formula for the proportional-hazards regression model. , 1983, Biometrics.