Current and potential negative effects of autonomous vehicles

There is a general enthusiastic approach toward autonomous vehicles, e.g. they are claimed to be the breakthrough solution for a drastic reduction of road accidents, largely caused by human errors. However, their current and potential negative effects have not been adequately addressed yet: decreasing driving skills, new “ automotive digital divide ”, additional reaction time, “ last mile ” issue for automated HGVs are only some examples of still pending issues that can jeopardize the expected advantages. This paper analyzes the levels of automated driving defined by SAEJ3016 according to the current literature and resumes the main issues not yet adequately solved, in order to give a clear picture of the current and potential negative effect of each level, starting from “Level 2 - Partial automation” up to “level 4 –High automation”. Level 5 is not analyzed because its deployment appears too far in the time and there are not enough data for an effective discussion. The position of the automotive industry and its need to re-invent the business is related to the present market approach and may have a relevant influence on the incoming paradigm shift. assistance systems of both steering and acceleration/ deceleration using information about the driving environment and with the expectation that the human driver perform all remaining aspects of the dynamic driving task

[1]  Natasha Merat,et al.  How do Drivers Behave in a Highly Automated Car , 2017 .

[2]  Giuseppe Cantisani,et al.  New research opportunities for roadside safety barriers improvement , 2017 .

[3]  Giuseppe Cantisani,et al.  Reference trajectories of vehicles for road alignment design , 2017 .

[4]  M. Hjälmdahl,et al.  Driver behaviour and driver experience of partial and fully automated truck platooning – a simulator study , 2017 .

[5]  Francesco Paolo Deflorio,et al.  Evoluzione dell'auto verso l'autonomia: collocazione storico-evolutiva, motivazioni ed effetti sulla sicurezza , 2017 .

[6]  M A Regan,et al.  Autonomous vehicles: human factors issues and future research , 2015 .

[7]  Riender Happee,et al.  Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents , 2015 .

[8]  Giuseppe Cantisani,et al.  Global assessment method of road distresses , 2015 .

[9]  G. Loprencipe,et al.  A Statistics Based Approach for Defining Reference Trajectories on Road Sections , 2013 .

[10]  Francesco Paolo Deflorio,et al.  Assessing the effects of inter-vehicle communication systems on road safety , 2009 .

[11]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[12]  F. Hofmann THE IMPROVEMENT UNDER WET CONDITIONS OF THE NIGHT-TIME VISIBILITY OF CARRIAGEWAY MARKINGS , 1979 .

[13]  G. Johansson,et al.  Drivers' Brake Reaction Times , 1971, Human factors.