Contrasting Intellectual Patterns Predict Creativity in the Arts and Sciences

A sample of 2,409 intellectually talented adolescents (top 1%) who were assessed on the SAT by age 13 was tracked longitudinally for more than 25 years. Their creative accomplishments, with particular emphasis on literary achievement and scientific-technical innovation, were examined as a function of ability level (sum of math and verbal SAT scores) and tilt (math SAT score minus verbal SAT score). Results showed that distinct ability patterns uncovered by age 13 portend contrasting forms of creative expression by middle age. Whereas ability level contributes significantly to creative accomplishments, ability tilt is critical for predicting the specific domain in which they occur (e.g., securing a tenure-track position in the humanities vs. science, technology, engineering, or mathematics; publishing a novel vs. securing a patent).

[1]  David Lubinski,et al.  Spatial Ability: A Neglected Dimension In Talent Searches For Intellectually Precocious Youth , 2007 .

[2]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering , 2007 .

[3]  Kelsey E. Medeiros,et al.  Beyond Bias and Barriers : Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering , 2007 .

[4]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth After 35 Years: Uncovering Antecedents for the Development of Math-Science Expertise , 2006, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[5]  J. Stanley,et al.  Insights From SMPY's Greatest Former Child Prodigies: Drs. Terence (“Terry”) Tao and Lenhard (“Lenny”) Ng Reflect on Their Talent Development , 2006 .

[6]  David Lubinski,et al.  Tracking Exceptional Human Capital Over Two Decades , 2006, Psychological science.

[7]  James M. Jones,et al.  Increasing the number of psychologists of color: public policy issues for affirmative diversity. , 2006, The American psychologist.

[8]  David Lubinski,et al.  Creativity and Occupational Accomplishments Among Intellectually Precocious Youths: An Age 13 to Age 33 Longitudinal Study. , 2005 .

[9]  Jane Zimmer Daniels,et al.  Gender Differences and Performance in Science , 2005, Science.

[10]  L. Spångberg The world is flat. , 2005, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[11]  James T. Walz The Wealth of Knowledge: Intellectual Capital and the Twenty‐First Century Organization , 2005 .

[12]  Helping students learn only what they don't already know. , 2000 .

[13]  L. Pil The Rise of the Creative Class , 2004 .

[14]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Importance of Assessing Spatial Ability in Intellectually Talented Young Adolescents: A 20-Year Longitudinal Study. , 2001 .

[15]  David Lubinski,et al.  Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability at Age 13: Their Status 20 Years Later , 2000, Psychological science.

[16]  Luis Suarez-Villa,et al.  Invention and the rise of technocapitalism , 2000 .

[17]  Carol L. Gohm,et al.  Underachievement Among Spatially Gifted Students , 1998 .

[18]  J. Stanley,et al.  INEQUITY IN EQUITY: How "Equity" Can Lead to Inequity for High-Potential Students , 1996 .

[19]  L G Humphreys,et al.  Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. , 1993, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Camilla Persson Benbow,et al.  Academic achievement in mathematics and science of students between ages 13 and 23: Are there differences among students in the top one percent of mathematical ability? , 1992 .