Tossing quantum coins and dice

The procedure of tossing quantum coins and dice is described. This case is an important example of a quantum procedure because it presents a typical framework employed in quantum information processing and quantum computing. The emphasis is on the clarification of the difference between quantum and classical conditional probabilities. These probabilities are designed for characterizing different systems, either quantum or classical, and they, generally, cannot be reduced to each other. Thus the Lüders probability cannot be treated as a generalization of the classical conditional probability. The analogies between quantum theory of measurements and quantum decision theory are elucidated.

[1]  L. Pessoa.  On the relationship between emotion and cognition , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  M. Keyl.  Fundamentals of quantum information theory , 2002, quant-ph/0202122.

[3]  Stanley P. Gudder.  Quantum probability spaces , 1969 .

[4]  K. Scherer.  Studying appraisal-driven emotion processes: taking stock and moving to the future , 2018, Cognition & emotion.

[5]  N. Zanghí,et al.  Conditional probabilities in quantum mechanics. I.—Conditioning with respect to a single event , 1983 .

[6]  Douglas H. Wedell.  Distinguishing Among Models of Contextually Induced Preference Reversals , 1991 .

[7]  J. Lerner,et al.  Emotion and decision making. , 2015, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  F. Khalili,et al.  Quantum nondemolition measurements: the route from toys to tools , 1996 .

[9]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Scheme of thinking quantum systems , 2009, ArXiv.

[10]  Moni Naor,et al.  Quantum Interaction , 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[11]  Gerd Niestegge,et al.  An Approach to Quantum Mechanics via Conditional Probabilities , 2008 .

[12]  V. Yukalov.  Stochastic instability of quasi-isolated systems. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Sébastien Duchêne,et al.  Quantum-like models cannot account for the conjunction fallacy , 2015 .

[14]  N. Aharon,et al.  Quantum dice rolling: a multi-outcome generalization of quantum coin flipping , 2009, 0909.4186.

[15]  Shao,et al.  Decoherence of quantum-nondemolition systems. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[16]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Decision theory with prospect interference and entanglement , 2011, ArXiv.

[17]  D. Sornette,et al.  Quantum decision making by social agents , 2012, 1202.4918.

[18]  D. Sornette,et al.  Inconclusive Quantum Measurements and Decisions under Uncertainty , 2016, Front. Phys..

[19]  V. Yukalov.  Decoherence and equilibration under nondestructive measurements , 2012, 1202.4263.

[20]  Isabel Guerra Bobo.  On Quantum Conditional Probability , 2013 .

[21]  R. Reisenzein.  Cognition and emotion: a plea for theory , 2019, Cognition & emotion.

[22]  Christopher P. Puto,et al.  Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .

[23]  Yanping Zhang,et al.  Analysis of Snail1 function and regulation by Twist1 in palatal fusion , 2013, Front. Physio..

[24]  Charles Leake,et al.  Conditional Inference and Logic for Intelligent Systems , 1993 .

[25]  M. Horodecki,et al.  Quantum entanglement , 2007, quant-ph/0702225.

[26]  A. Albrecht,et al.  Origin of probabilities and their application to the multiverse , 2012, 1212.0953.

[27]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Quantum Decision Theory as Quantum Theory of Measurement , 2008, ArXiv.

[28]  V. I. Yukalov,et al.  Evolutionary Processes in Quantum Decision Theory , 2020, Entropy.

[29]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Preference reversal in quantum decision theory , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[30]  Sébastien Duchêne,et al.  Testing quantum-like models of judgment for question order effect , 2015, Math. Soc. Sci..

[31]  Fabio Bagarello,et al.  Quantum Concepts in the Social, Ecological and Biological Sciences , 2019 .

[32]  D. Sornette,et al.  Quantum Decision Theory in Simple Risky Choices , 2016, PloS one.

[33]  K. Scherer.  The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model , 2009 .

[34]  V. Vedral.  The role of relative entropy in quantum information theory , 2001, quant-ph/0102094.

[35]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Quantum probability and quantum decision-making , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[36]  H. Oppewal,et al.  The attraction effect is more pronounced for consumers who rely on intuitive reasoning , 2012 .

[37]  M. Lewenstein,et al.  Quantum Entanglement , 2020, Quantum Mechanics.

[38]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Processing Information in Quantum Decision Theory , 2008, Entropy.

[39]  A. Jamiołkowski.  Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators , 1972 .

[40]  A. Faisal,et al.  Noise in the nervous system , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[41]  A. Vaziri,et al.  Experimental quantum coin tossing. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[42]  N. G. van Kampen,et al.  A soluble model for quantum mechanical dissipation , 1995 .

[43]  Edward W. Piotrowski,et al.  An Invitation to Quantum Game Theory , 2002, ArXiv.

[44]  Hong Guo,et al.  A survey of quantum games , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[45]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[46]  G. Tóth,et al.  Entanglement detection , 2008, 0811.2803.

[47]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Conditions for Quantum Interference in Cognitive Sciences , 2013, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[48]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Quantitative Predictions in Quantum Decision Theory , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[49]  N. Schwarz.  Emotion, cognition, and decision making , 2000 .

[50]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Seeking Subjective Dominance in Multidimensional Space: An Explanation of the Asymmetric Dominance Effect , 1995 .

[51]  A. Tversky,et al.  Context-dependent preferences , 1993 .

[52]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Role of Information in Decision Making of Social Agents , 2012, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[53]  Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac,et al.  A new notation for quantum mechanics , 1939, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[54]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Manipulating Decision Making of Typical Agents , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[55]  Jens Eisert,et al.  Quantum games , 2000 .

[56]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Physics of risk and uncertainty in quantum decision making , 2008, ArXiv.

[57]  E. P. Yukalova,et al.  Mode interference in quantum joint probabilities for multimode Bose-condensed systems , 2013, 1310.6141.

[58]  Agnes Moors,et al.  The Emotion Process: Event Appraisal and Component Differentiation. , 2019, Annual review of psychology.

[59]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Quantum Probabilities as Behavioral Probabilities , 2017, Entropy.

[60]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[61]  U. Böckenholt,et al.  Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis , 2015 .

[62]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Mathematical Structure of Quantum Decision Theory , 2008, Adv. Complex Syst..

[63]  Andrzej Łukasik,et al.  Quantum models of cognition and decision , 2018, Int. J. Parallel Emergent Distributed Syst..

[64]  Man-Duen Choi,et al.  Positive Linear Maps on C*-Algebras , 1972, Canadian Journal of Mathematics.

[65]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Quantum probabilities of composite events in quantum measurements with multimode states , 2013, 1308.5604.

[66]  K. Scherer,et al.  The Relationship of Emotion to Cognition: A Functional Approach to a Semantic Controversy , 1987 .