Classification of Airborne Hyperspectral Data Based on the Average Learning Subspace Method

This letter introduces the averaged learning subspace method (ALSM) that can be applied directly to original hyperspectral data for the purpose of classifying land cover. The ALSM algorithm of classification consists of the following iterative steps: (1) generate the initial appropriate feature subspace for each class in training datasets using the class-featuring information compression method, and (2) update the subspaces according to the maximum projection principle. We compare ALSM with the support vector machine classifier. By conducting experiments on two hyperspectral datasets (48 bands and 191 bands, respectively), we demonstrate that the ALSM can make dimensional reduction and classification simultaneously. When compared with the SVM classifier, it appears that the ALSM can achieve a higher accuracy on classification in some cases.

[1]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Subspace Dimension Selection and Averaged Learning Subspace Method in Handwritten Digit Classification , 1996, ICANN.

[2]  Tsutomu Matsunaga A study of document filtering using the subspace method of pattern recognition , 2000 .

[3]  David A. Landgrebe,et al.  Supervised classification in high-dimensional space: geometrical, statistical, and asymptotical properties of multivariate data , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[4]  Gabriele Moser,et al.  Extraction of Spectral Channels From Hyperspectral Images for Classification Purposes , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  John A. Richards,et al.  Efficient transmission and classification of hyperspectral image data , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Steven Johnson The relationship between the matched-filter operator and the target signature space-orthogonal projection classifier , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  D. Landgrebe Multispectral land sensing: where from, where to? , 2003, IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data, 2003.

[9]  Johannes R. Sveinsson,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral data from urban areas based on extended morphological profiles , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Subspace methods of pattern recognition , 1983 .

[11]  Farid Melgani,et al.  Toward an Optimal SVM Classification System for Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Dimensionality reduction and classification of hyperspectral image data using sequences of extended morphological transformations , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Orthogonal subspace projection (OSP) revisited: a comprehensive study and analysis , 2005, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[14]  Tsutomu Matsunaga,et al.  A study of document filtering using the subspace method of pattern recognition , 2000, Systems and Computers in Japan.

[15]  H. Rutishauser The Jacobi method for real symmetric matrices , 1966 .