Formulation of rod-forming models and their application in spray forming

AbstractIn rod spray forming, the preform changes its shape continually from that of a disc to a rod (transient-state rod growth) and then maintains its top surface profile once it has settled down (steady-state rod growth). The rod growth mechanism during spray forming was analyzed using rod-forming models. At a sufficiently high substrate rotation velocity, the calculated results based on the three-dimensional time-dependent model (3-D TDM) and the two-dimensional time-dependent model (2-D TDM) were observed to be identical. The calculated results of the rod’s top shape, obtained by the TDMs, were almost identical to those obtained by the two-dimensional time-independent model (2-D TIM), which means that there exists steady-state rod growth. The effects of spray-forming parameters, such as initial eccentric distance, substrate withdrawal velocity, and spray angle, on the shape-evolution behavior were analyzed in terms of the vertex growth velocity ( $$\overline {G_o^v } $$ ). The optimum spray-forming condition to minimize transient-state rod growth was also presented. Experimental verification was made to confirm the proposed forming models.

[1]  E. Lavernia,et al.  Kinetics of ceramic particulate penetration into spray atomized metallic droplet at variable penetration depth , 1994 .

[2]  Dimos Poulikakos,et al.  Heat transfer aspects of splat-quench solidification: modelling and experiment , 1994 .

[3]  Diran Apelian,et al.  Analysis of the spray deposition process , 1989 .

[4]  Diran Apelian,et al.  Spray casting: an integral model for process understanding and control , 1991 .

[5]  Ian A. Frigaard The Dynamics of Spray-Formed Billets , 1995, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[6]  Patrick S. Grant,et al.  Modelling of droplet dynamic and thermal histories during spray forming—II. Effect of process parameters , 1993 .

[7]  E. Lavernia,et al.  Evolution of interaction domain microstructure during spray deposition , 1994 .

[8]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[9]  Gerardo Trapaga,et al.  Mathematical modeling of the isothermal impingement of liquid droplets in spraying processes , 1991 .

[10]  Brian Cantor,et al.  Direct measurement of sprayform temperatures and the effect of liquid fraction on microstructure , 1998 .

[11]  W. Kurz,et al.  Fundamentals of Solidification , 1990 .

[12]  J. Szekely,et al.  Fluid flow, heat transfer, and solidification of molten metal droplets impinging on substrates: Comparison of numerical and experimental results , 1992 .

[13]  S. Ahn,et al.  Solidification progress and heat transfer analysis of gas-atomized alloy droplets during spray forming , 1994 .

[14]  Patrick S. Grant,et al.  Modelling of droplet dynamic and thermal histories during spray forming—I. individual droplet behaviour , 1993 .

[15]  Alan Watt,et al.  Fundamentals of three-dimensional computer graphics , 1989 .

[16]  Kyu Hwan Oh,et al.  A three-dimensional model of the spray forming method , 1998 .

[17]  Roger H. Rangel,et al.  Numerical analysis of the deformation and solidification of a single droplet impinging onto a flat substrate , 1993 .