From Communication between Individuals to Collective Beliefs

How is social information transmitted in a group? How do groups create new identities and judgments about other groups through communicating their beliefs and opinions among the members of their own group? Several studies in social cognition have documented that communication about groups typically tends to bolster stereotypes and shared beliefs about these groups (Brauer, Judd & Jacquelin, 2001; Klein, Jacobs, Gemoets, Licata & Lambert, 2003; Lyons & Kashima, 2003). This confirmation bias can be seen as an example of a type of collective intentionality. In the present paper, a multi-agent connectionist model is proposed that is capable of simulating these stereotype confirmation biases in group communication, as well as the effects of some moderating conditions. The model combines features of standard recurrent models to simulate the process of information uptake, integration and memorization within agents with novel aspects that simulate the communication of beliefs and opinions between agents. By studying these novel communicative aspects within the framework of standard models of information processing, the unique communicative mechanisms underlying the emergence of a confirmation bias in groups beyond intra-personal factors can be explored.

[1]  Frank Van Overwalle,et al.  A Recurrent Connectionist Model of Person Impression Formation , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[2]  Stephen J. Read,et al.  An autoassociative model of causal reasoning and causal learning : Reply to Van Overwalle's (1998) critique of Read and Marcus-Newhall (1993) , 1999 .

[3]  F. Van Overwalle,et al.  A Connectionist Model of Attitude Formation and Change , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[4]  Dirk Van Rooy,et al.  A recurrent connectionist model of group biases. , 2003, Psychological review.

[5]  C. Judd,et al.  The communication of social stereotypes: the effects of group discussion and information distribution on stereotypic appraisals. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Yoshihisa Kashima,et al.  How are stereotypes maintained through communication? The influence of stereotype sharedness. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Diagnosing groups: charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Siobhan Chapman Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[9]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Knowledge acquisition, accessibility, and use in person perception and stereotyping: simulation with a recurrent connectionist network. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Olivier Klein,et al.  Hidden profiles and the consensualization of social stereotypes: how information distribution affects stereotype content and sharedness , 2003 .