With an increasing number of vehicles satisfying the FMVSS 208 Flat Barrier Impact Test and increasing belt usage, a high reduction of occupant injuries in general and a change from acceleration-induced to intrusion-induced injury mechanisms has been observed in Europe. The significance of intrusion-induced injury mechanisms associated with offset frontal impacts is assuming greater importance. Beginning in 1978, in response to this challenge, Mercedes-Benz has emphasized front structural countermeasures that have been found to be effective in the frequent asymmetrical frontal impacts. As an internal test, an offset impact with 40% overlap against a rigid barrier was defined. The relationship between actual accident frontal-overlap damage and barrier-test overlap values is explored in the paper. The results support the view that if a test of this type and associated design countermeasures were adopted by all vehicle manufacturers, a significant reduction of injuries would take place.
[1]
C A Hobbs.
THE NEED FOR IMPROVED STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY IN FRONTAL CAR IMPACTS
,
1991
.
[2]
D Scheunert,et al.
Development of a new injury cost scale.
,
1993,
Accident; analysis and prevention.
[3]
H Burg,et al.
EES - EIN HILFSMITTEL ZUR UNFALLREKONSTRUKTION UND DESSEN AUSWIRKUNGEN AUF DIE UNFALLFORSCHUNG
,
1980
.
[4]
L. Grösch,et al.
Safety Performance of Passenger Cars Designed to Accommodate Frontal impacts with Partial Barrier Overlap
,
1989
.
[5]
Gayle Dalrymple,et al.
OVERLAP CAR-TO-CAR TESTS COMPARED TO CAR-TO-HALF BARRIER AND CAR-TO-FULL BARRIER TESTS
,
1991
.