How do conditions at birth influence early‐life growth rates in wild boar?

. Weather conditions and population density individuals experience at birth in fl uence their life-history traits and thereby population dynamics. Early-life individual growth is a key fi tness-related trait; however, how it is affected by such conditions at birth remains to be explored. Taking advantage of long-term monitoring of three wild boar ( Sus scrofa ) populations living in contrasting ecological contexts, we assess how weather conditions (temperature and precipitation) and the number of removed individuals at birth in fl uence early-life growth rates. We found that the number of individuals removed before the early-growth period had a positive effect on early-life growth rate across sites. This might be interpreted as a density-dependent response involving an increase in food availability per capita that favors faster growth. Alternatively, if the number of removed individuals increases with population density, this result might be attributable to decreasing litter sizes at high density, leading mothers to allocate more resources to individual offspring, which favors higher juvenile growth rates. Early-life growth rates also increased with spring-time temperature and decreasing precipitation. Thus, early-life growth is expected to increase in response to warmer and drier springs, which should become more frequent in the future under current climate change. We found that conditions at birth explained very little among-year variation in early-life growth rates (i.e., weak cohort effects) and that within-year variation in early-life growth rates was more likely caused by strong individual differences.

[1]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Grow fast at no cost: no evidence for a mortality cost for fast early-life growth in a hunted wild boar population , 2020, Oecologia.

[2]  E. Fuglei,et al.  Contrasting consequences of climate change for migratory geese: Predation, density dependence and carryover effects offset benefits of high‐arctic warming , 2019, Global change biology.

[3]  B. Sæther,et al.  More frequent extreme climate events stabilize reindeer population dynamics , 2019, Nature Communications.

[4]  Phenotypic plasticity in bighorn sheep reproductive phenology: from individual to population , 2019, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[5]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Pollen limitation as a main driver of fruiting dynamics in oak populations. , 2018, Ecology letters.

[6]  Martin A. Stoffel,et al.  rptR: repeatability estimation and variance decomposition by generalized linear mixed‐effects models , 2017 .

[7]  Petri T. Niemelä,et al.  Individual versus pseudo‐repeatability in behaviour: Lessons from translocation experiments in a wild insect , 2017, The Journal of animal ecology.

[8]  Increasing spring temperatures favor oak seed production in temperate areas , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[9]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Reproductive allocation in pulsed-resource environments: a comparative study in two populations of wild boar , 2017, Oecologia.

[10]  Interactions between demography and environmental effects are important determinants of population dynamics , 2017, Science Advances.

[11]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Cohort variation in individual body mass dissipates with age in large herbivores , 2016 .

[12]  J. Gaillard,et al.  When relative allocation depends on total resource acquisition: implication for the analysis of trade‐offs , 2016, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[13]  U. Siebert,et al.  The influence of environmental and physiological factors on the litter size of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in an agriculture dominated area in Germany. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  T. Ruf,et al.  What Is a Mild Winter? Regional Differences in Within-Species Responses to Climate Change , 2015, PloS one.

[15]  Carlos Fonseca,et al.  Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe. , 2015, Pest management science.

[16]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Variation in adult body mass of roe deer: early environmental conditions influence early and late body growth of females. , 2013, Ecology.

[17]  John H. Giudice,et al.  A comparison of models using removal effort to estimate animal abundance , 2013 .

[18]  Damaris Zurell,et al.  Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance , 2013 .

[19]  Olivier Gimenez,et al.  Influence of harvesting pressure on demographic tactics: implications for wildlife management. , 2011 .

[20]  C. Dmitriew The evolution of growth trajectories: what limits growth rate? , 2011, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[21]  K. Bøe,et al.  Maternal investment, sibling competition, and offspring survival with increasing litter size and parity in pigs (Sus scrofa) , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Repeatability for Gaussian and non‐Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists , 2010, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[23]  S. Saïd,et al.  Impact of deer on temperate forest vegetation and woody debris as protection of forest regeneration against browsing , 2010 .

[24]  Gaillard Jean-Michel,et al.  Pulsed resources and climate-induced variation in the reproductive traits of wild boar under high hunting pressure. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[25]  François Klein,et al.  Seasonal variation in diet composition and similarity of sympatric red deer Cervus elaphus and roe deer Capreolus capreolus , 2008 .

[26]  Heiko G. Rödel,et al.  Separating maternal and litter-size effects on early postnatal growth in two species of altricial small mammals , 2008, Physiology & Behavior.

[27]  P. Monaghan Early growth conditions, phenotypic development and environmental change , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  L. Powell APPROXIMATING VARIANCE OF DEMOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS USING THE DELTA METHOD: A REFERENCE FOR AVIAN BIOLOGISTS , 2007 .

[29]  B. Jędrzejewska,et al.  Litter size, sex ratio, and age structure of gray wolves, Canis lupus, in relation to population fluctuations in northern Belarus , 2007 .

[30]  J. Gaillard,et al.  How does environmental variation influence body mass, body size, and body condition? Roe deer as a case study , 2006 .

[31]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Using a proxy of plant productivity (NDVI) to find key periods for animal performance: the case of roe deer , 2006 .

[32]  Randt,et al.  DIET OF THE WILD BOAR IN THE FRENCH ALPS , 2005 .

[33]  G. White,et al.  VALIDITY OF PRAIRIE GROUSE HARVEST-AGE RATIOS AS PRODUCTION INDICES , 2004 .

[34]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Sex differentiation in postnatal growth rate: a test in a wild boar population , 1992, Oecologia.

[35]  D. Conover,et al.  Countergradient variation in growth rate: compensation for length of the growing season among Atlantic silversides from different latitudes , 1990, Oecologia.

[36]  J. Byers,et al.  Sex-specific maternal investment in pronghorn, and the question of a limit on differential provisioning in ungulates , 1990, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[37]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Climate and density shape population dynamics of a marine top predator , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Effects of hurricane lothar on the population dynamics of european roe deer , 2003 .

[39]  Y. Ropert‐Coudert,et al.  Seasonal and annual variations in earthworm consumption by wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa L.) , 2003 .

[40]  I. Cattadori,et al.  Are indirect measures of abundance a useful index of population density? The case of red grouse harvesting , 2003 .

[41]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Cohort effects and deer population dynamics , 2003 .

[42]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Avoiding pitfalls when using information-theoretic methods , 2002 .

[43]  Charles J. Krebs,et al.  Reproductive changes in a cyclic population of snowshoe hares , 2001 .

[44]  B T Grenfell,et al.  Age, sex, density, winter weather, and population crashes in Soay sheep. , 2001, Science.

[45]  N. Metcalfe,et al.  Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[46]  C. Both,et al.  ADAPTIVE DENSITY DEPENDENCE OF AVIAN CLUTCH SIZE , 2000 .

[47]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Temporal Variation in Fitness Components and Population Dynamics of Large Herbivores , 2000 .

[48]  B. Sinervo,et al.  Density cycles and an offspring quantity and quality game driven by natural selection , 2000, Nature.

[49]  J. Lindström,et al.  Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[50]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Effects of density and weather on survival of bighorn sheep lambs ( Ovis canadensis ) , 1998 .

[51]  F. Klein,et al.  Domaine vital diurne et déplacements de biches (Cervus elaphus) sur le secteur de La Petite Pierre (Bas-Rhin) , 1997 .

[52]  A. V. van Noordwijk,et al.  Acquisition and Allocation of Resources: Their Influence on Variation in Life History Tactics , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[53]  J. Noblet,et al.  Thermoregulation and energy metabolism in the neonatal pig. , 1983, Annales de recherches veterinaires. Annals of veterinary research.

[54]  M. Cody,et al.  A GENERAL THEORY OF CLUTCH SIZE , 1966, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[55]  D. Lack The Significance of Clutch-Size in the Partridge (Perdix perdix) , 1947 .