Spaced Learning Enhances Episodic Memory by Increasing Neural Pattern Similarity Across Repetitions

Spaced learning has been shown consistently to benefit memory compared with massed learning, yet the neural representations and processes underlying the spacing effect are still poorly understood. In particular, two influential models (i.e., the encoding variability hypothesis and the study-phase retrieval hypothesis) could both model behavioral performance very well, but they make opposite hypotheses regarding the spacing effect's neural mechanisms. The present study attempted to provide empirical neural evidence to adjudicate these competing hypotheses. Using spatiotemporal pattern similarity (STPS) analysis of EEG data, this study investigated whether and how repetition lags (massed/short-spaced/long-spaced) modulated the STPS's contribution to episodic memory encoding in male and female human participants. The results revealed that greater item-specific STPS in the right frontal electrodes at 543–727 ms after stimulus onset was associated with better memory performance. More importantly, this STPS was larger under the spaced-learning condition than the massed-learning condition and partially mediated the spacing effect on memory performance. In addition, we found that massed learning was associated with stronger repetition suppression in the N400 component that reflected momentary retrieval strength, but reduced activity in the late positive component that was associated with memory retrieval. These results suggest that spaced learning improves long-term memory by increasing retrieval effort and enhancing the pattern reinstatement of prior neural representations, which may be achieved by reducing the momentary retrieval strength as the extended repetition lags might help to eliminate the residual representation in working memory. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT As one of the most ubiquitous and fundamental phenomena in the history of memory research, the spacing effect provides an important window into understanding how enduring memory is formed in the brain and how different practice strategies could modulate these mechanisms to affect memory performance. By leveraging the neural representational analysis on scalp EEG data, the current study provides the first empirical data to show that spaced learning enhances memory by improving the spatiotemporal similarity that occurs at a late time window. Our results support the study-phase retrieval hypothesis but not the encoding variability hypothesis and emphasize the role of neural pattern reinstatement in strengthening memory via repeated study.

[1]  Su Keun Jeong,et al.  Behaviorally Relevant Abstract Object Identity Representation in the Human Parietal Cortex , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Wen Gao,et al.  The CAS-PEAL Large-Scale Chinese Face Database and Baseline Evaluations , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[3]  Radoslaw Martin Cichy,et al.  Resolving human object recognition in space and time , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Jeremy R. Manning,et al.  Oscillatory patterns in temporal lobe reveal context reinstatement during memory search , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Koch Sigmund Ed,et al.  Psychology: A Study of A Science , 1962 .

[6]  T. Wickens,et al.  Examining the Spacing Effect in Advertising: Encoding Variability, Retrieval Processes, and Their Interaction , 2005 .

[7]  Per B. Sederberg,et al.  Trial-level information for individual faces in the fusiform face area depends on subsequent memory , 2016, NeuroImage.

[8]  A. Schnider,et al.  Differential processing of immediately repeated verbal and non‐verbal stimuli: an evoked‐potential study , 2016, The European journal of neuroscience.

[9]  Gui Xue,et al.  Transformed Neural Pattern Reinstatement during Episodic Memory Retrieval , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  P. E. Morris,et al.  Practical aspects of memory : current research and issues , 1988 .

[11]  Merel Kindt,et al.  Neural pattern similarity predicts long-term fear memory , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  Gui Xue,et al.  The Neural Representations Underlying Human Episodic Memory , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  D. Schacter,et al.  Interactions Between Forms of Memory: When Priming Hinders New Episodic Learning , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Aaron S. Benjamin,et al.  What makes distributed practice effective? , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[17]  N. Schweighofer,et al.  Neural correlates of the spacing effect in explicit verbal semantic encoding support the deficient‐processing theory , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[18]  Wallace E. Lambert,et al.  Bilingual dual-coding theory and semantic repetition effects on recall. , 1988 .

[19]  M. Rugg,et al.  Human recognition memory: a cognitive neuroscience perspective , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Models that allow us to perceive the world more accurately also allow us to remember past events more accurately via differentiation , 2017, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  H. Pashler,et al.  Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  Paul Smolen,et al.  The right time to learn: mechanisms and optimization of spaced learning , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  Brice A. Kuhl,et al.  Resistance to forgetting associated with hippocampus-mediated reactivation during new learning , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  The effect of distributed practice: Neuroscience, cognition, and education , 2015, Trends in Neuroscience and Education.

[25]  W. Ziegler The Oxford Handbook Of Event Related Potential Components , 2016 .

[26]  Gui Xue,et al.  Neural Global Pattern Similarity Underlies True and False Memories , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Charles J. Petrie,et al.  Context Maintenance , 1991, AAAI.

[28]  M. Laganaro,et al.  ERP correlates of word production predictors in picture naming: a trial by trial multiple regression analysis from stimulus onset to response , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[29]  Ed Vul,et al.  Predicting the Optimal Spacing of Study: A Multiscale Context Model of Memory , 2009, NIPS.

[30]  William A. Johnston,et al.  The contributions of encoding effort and variability to the spacing effect on free recall. , 1976 .

[31]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Spaced Learning Enhances Subsequent Recognition Memory by Reducing Neural Repetition Suppression , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. , 1988 .

[33]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  The impact of study design on pattern estimation for single-trial multivariate pattern analysis , 2014, NeuroImage.

[34]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation , 1992 .

[35]  M. Kahana,et al.  A retrieved context account of spacing and repetition effects in free recall. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  J. Mumford,et al.  Greater Neural Pattern Similarity Across Repetitions Is Associated with Better Memory , 2010, Science.

[37]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[38]  Peter P J L Verkoeijen,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of word repetition spacing: ERP and induced band power old/new effects with massed and spaced repetitions. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[39]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions. , 1999 .

[40]  G. Xue,et al.  Reduced Fidelity of Neural Representation Underlies Episodic Memory Decline in Normal Aging , 2018, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Revisiting the incremental effects of context on word processing: Evidence from single-word event-related brain potentials. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[42]  S. Luck,et al.  The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components , 2011 .

[43]  P. R. D’Agostino,et al.  Effects of repetition as a function of study-phase retrieval , 1976 .

[44]  G. Xue,et al.  Neural mechanisms of the spacing effect in episodic memory: A parallel EEG and fMRI study , 2015, Cortex.

[45]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Hermann Ebbinghaus (1885) Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology , 2013, Annals of Neurosciences.

[47]  G. Xue,et al.  Spatiotemporal Neural Pattern Similarity Supports Episodic Memory , 2015, Current Biology.

[48]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. , 2009, Psychological review.

[49]  Brice A. Kuhl,et al.  Repetition Suppression and Multi-Voxel Pattern Similarity Differentially Track Implicit and Explicit Visual Memory , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  S. Madigan,et al.  Intraserial repetition and coding processes in free recall , 1969 .

[51]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  About Practice: Repetition, Spacing, and Abstraction , 2014 .

[52]  T. Curran,et al.  Using ERPs to dissociate recollection from familiarity in picture recognition. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[53]  R. Henson,et al.  Electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of face perception, recognition and priming. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[54]  Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers,et al.  Spacing and repetition effects in human memory: application of the SAM model , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[55]  Markus F. Neumann,et al.  Repetition effects in human ERPs to faces , 2016, Cortex.

[56]  Michael D Rugg,et al.  Memory Reactivation Predicts Resistance to Retroactive Interference: Evidence from Multivariate Classification and Pattern Similarity Analyses , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  Brice A. Kuhl,et al.  Parietal Representations of Stimulus Features Are Amplified during Memory Retrieval and Flexibly Aligned with Top-Down Goals , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[58]  R. Rikers,et al.  Limitations to the spacing effect: demonstration of an inverted u-shaped relationship between interrepetition spacing and free recall. , 2005, Experimental psychology.

[59]  Henk G Schmidt,et al.  Detrimental influence of contextual change on spacing effects in free recall. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[60]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[61]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[62]  Joseph Hilbe,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2009 .