Optical vs. electronic packet switching: myth and advantage in 5G time-critical applications

We show by simulation that the throughput and delay of applications that require zero losses in 5G metropolitan networks are greatly improved by replacing current electronic packet switching (EPS) networks with optical packet switching (OPS) networks with bufferless switches (no RAM, no fiber-delay-lines) that do not implement any kind of circuit-switching. The reason is that the total lack of queueuing delays in the bufferless OPS switches more than compensates their high losses, allowing end-to-end transport protocols to react faster to those losses and to ultimately offer applications lossless service with higher throughput and lower latencies than in EPS networks.

[1]  Michael Schlosser,et al.  Performance of fixed-length, variable-capacity packets in optical packet-switching networks , 2015, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[2]  Pablo Jesus Argibay-Losada,et al.  On whether OCS maximizes application throughput in all-optical datacenter networks , 2015, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[3]  Sally Floyd,et al.  TCP Selective Acknowledgement Options , 1996 .

[4]  Sally Floyd,et al.  TCP Selective Acknowledgment Options , 1996, RFC.

[5]  Didier Colle,et al.  Power consumption in telecommunication networks: overview and reduction strategies , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  R. Takahashi,et al.  Hybrid optoelectronic router for asynchronous optical packets , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Photonics in Switching.

[7]  Gokhan Sahin,et al.  Using stop-and-wait to improve TCP throughput in fast optical switching (FOS) networks over short physical distances , 2014, IEEE INFOCOM 2014 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.

[8]  H. Harai,et al.  High-speed buffer management for 40 gb/s-based photonic packet switches , 2006, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.