The interaction between stimulus-driven and goal-driven orienting as revealed by eye movements.

It is generally agreed that attention can be captured in a stimulus-driven or in a goal-driven fashion. In studies that investigated both types of capture, the effects on mean manual response time (reaction time [RT]) are generally additive, suggesting two independent underlying processes. However, potential interactions between the two types of capture may fail to be expressed in manual RT, as it likely reflects multiple processing steps. Here we measured saccadic eye movements along with manual responses. Participants searched a target display for a red letter. To assess contingent capture, this display was preceded by an irrelevant red cue. To assess stimulus-driven capture, the target display could be accompanied by the simultaneous onset of an irrelevant new object. At the level of eye movements, the results showed strong interactions between cue validity and onset presence on the spatiotemporal trajectories of the saccades. However, at the level of manual responses, these effects cancelled out, leading to additive effects on mean RT. We conclude that both types of capture influence a shared spatial orienting mechanism and we provide a descriptive computational model of their dynamics.

[1]  Giacomo Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor theory of attention , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[2]  J. Lupiáñez,et al.  A review of attentional capture: On its automaticity and sensitivity to endogenous control. , 2002 .

[3]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[4]  Brian A Anderson,et al.  Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: Testing a two-process model , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Shu-Chieh Wu,et al.  Characteristics of covert and overt visual orienting: Evidence from attentional and oculomotor capture. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  S. Yantis.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  B G Breitmeyer,et al.  Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. , 1976, Psychological review.

[8]  B. Dosher,et al.  The role of attention in the programming of saccades , 1995, Vision Research.

[9]  R. Remington,et al.  Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[10]  R. Remington,et al.  Top-down modulation of preattentive processing: Testing the recovery account of contingent capture , 2006 .

[11]  J. Theeuwes.  Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[13]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The cost of visual filtering. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  R. Rafal,et al.  Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings II: Additivity is no evidence for filtering , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  From reorienting of attention to biased competition: Evidence from hemifield effects , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[20]  J. Theeuwes.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[21]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[22]  P. Dixon,et al.  Assessing the evidence for response time mixture distributions , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[23]  Charles L. Folk,et al.  Bottom-up priming of top-down attentional control settings , 2008 .

[24]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  S. Yantis,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Andrew B. Leber,et al.  It’s under control: Top-down search strategies can override attentional capture , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  C Bundesen,et al.  Visual attention: Race models for selection from multielement displays , 1987, Psychological research.

[29]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  J. Theeuwes.  Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Our Eyes do Not Always Go Where we Want Them to Go: Capture of the Eyes by New Objects , 1998 .

[32]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Covert shifts of attention precede involuntary eye movements , 2004 .

[33]  J. Juola,et al.  Tradeoffs between attentional effects of spatial cues and abrupt onsets , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  R. Remington,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[36]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of return , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[38]  D. Meyer,et al.  Analyses of multinomial mixture distributions: new tests for stochastic models of cognition and action. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  R. Ratcliff.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[42]  J. Findlay,et al.  The Relationship between Eye Movements and Spatial Attention , 1986, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[43]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Prioritization by transients in visual search , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  J T Todd,et al.  Implications of a transient-sustained dichotomy for the measurement of human performance. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  Andrew B Leber,et al.  Neural Predictors of Within-Subject Fluctuations in Attentional Control , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Steven Franconeri,et al.  Searching for stimulus-driven shifts of attention , 2004, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[47]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Reward grabs the eye: Oculomotor capture by rewarding stimuli , 2012, Vision Research.