Longitudinal Nested Compliance Class Model in the Presence of Time-Varying Noncompliance

This article discusses a nested latent class model for analyzing longitudinal randomized trials when subjects do not always adhere to the treatment to which they are randomized. In the Prevention of Suicide in Primary Care Elderly: Collaborative Trial, subjects were randomized to either the control treatment, where they received standard care, or to the intervention, where they received standard care in addition to meeting with depression health specialists. The health specialists educate patients, their families, and physicians about depression and monitor their treatment. Those randomized to the control treatment have no access to the health specialists; however, those randomized to the intervention could choose not to meet with the health specialists, hence receiving only the standard care. Subjects participated in the study for two years where depression severity and adherence to meeting with health specialists were measured at each follow-up. The outcome of interest is the effect of meeting with the health specialists on depression severity. Traditional intention-to-treat and as-treated analyses may produce biased causal effect estimates in the presence of subject noncompliance. Utilizing a nested latent class model that uses subject-specific and time-invariant “superclasses” allows us to summarize longitudinal trends of compliance patterns and to estimate the effect of the intervention using intention-to-treat contrasts within principal strata that correspond to longitudinal compliance behavior patterns. Analyses show that subjects with more severe depression are more likely to adhere to treatment randomization, and those that are compliant and meet with health specialists benefit from the meetings and show improvement in depression. Simulation results show that our estimation procedure produces reasonable parameter estimates under correct model assumptions.

[1]  Ravi Varadhan,et al.  Methodology for Evaluating a Partially Controlled Longitudinal Treatment Using Principal Stratification, With Application to a Needle Exchange Program , 2004, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[2]  D. Rubin,et al.  Principal Stratification in Causal Inference , 2002, Biometrics.

[3]  S G Baker,et al.  The paired availability design: a proposal for evaluating epidural analgesia during labor. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization , 1978 .

[5]  A. Shapiro.  Monte Carlo Sampling Methods , 2003 .

[6]  D. Rubin,et al.  Bayesian inference for causal effects in randomized experiments with noncompliance , 1997 .

[7]  S. Zeger,et al.  Latent Class Model Diagnosis , 2000, Biometrics.

[8]  Michael R Elliott,et al.  Causal Models for Randomized Physician Encouragement Trials in Treating Primary Care Depression , 2004 .

[9]  D. Heitjan,et al.  Ignorability and bias in clinical trials. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  D. Rubin,et al.  Addressing complications of intention-to-treat analysis in the combined presence of all-or-none treatment-noncompliance and subsequent missing outcomes , 1999 .

[11]  L. A. Goodman.  Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models , 1974 .

[12]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[13]  D. Rubin,et al.  Assessing the effect of an influenza vaccine in an encouragement design. , 2000, Biostatistics.

[14]  D. Rubin.  Statistics and Causal Inference: Comment: Which Ifs Have Causal Answers , 1986 .

[15]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects , 2005 .

[16]  R. Little,et al.  Statistical Techniques for Analyzing Data from Prevention Trials: Treatment of No-Shows Using Rubin's Causal Model , 1998 .

[17]  Thomas R Ten Have,et al.  Reducing suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms in depressed older primary care patients: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[18]  D. Rubin,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. , 1989 .

[19]  I. Katz,et al.  Using a Bayesian latent growth curve model to identify trajectories of positive affect and negative events following myocardial infarction. , 2005, Biostatistics.

[20]  M. Daniels,et al.  A hierarchical modelling approach to analysing longitudinal data with drop‐out and non‐compliance, with application to an equivalence trial in paediatric acquired immune deficiency syndrome , 2002 .

[21]  Trivellore E Raghunathan,et al.  An Extended General Location Model for Causal Inferences from Data Subject to Noncompliance and Missing Values , 2004, Biometrics.

[22]  G. Imbens,et al.  Analyzing a randomized trial on breast self-examination with noncompliance and missing outcomes. , 2004, Biostatistics.

[23]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables , 1993 .

[24]  P. Holland.  Statistics and Causal Inference , 1985 .

[25]  R. Little,et al.  Inference for the Complier-Average Causal Effect From Longitudinal Data Subject to Noncompliance and Missing Data, With Application to a Job Training Assessment for the Unemployed , 2001 .

[26]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[27]  A. Brix.  Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn , 2005 .

[28]  Adrian F. M. Smith,et al.  Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities , 1990 .

[29]  R J Little,et al.  Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches. , 2000, Annual review of public health.

[30]  D. Rubin.  Comment: Which Ifs Have Causal Answers , 1986 .

[31]  W. K. Hastings,et al.  Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications , 1970 .

[32]  J. Vermunt.  Latent Class Models , 2004 .

[33]  M. Stephens.  Dealing with label switching in mixture models , 2000 .