Unsteady pressure measurements on a MAV wing for the design of a turbulence mitigation system

Experiments at low Reynolds numbers were performed on a pressure tapped NACA2313 wing in a 3 × 2 × 9 meter wind tunnel under nominally smooth (Ti = 1.2%) and turbulent (Ti = 7.2%) flows at a mean flow velocity of 8ms-1 (Re ≈ 120,000). Unsteady surface pressures were measured to understand if this information could be used to resolve for turbulence-induced perturbations and furthermore utilize this information in a turbulence mitigation system. Although pressure tapping the majority of the chord is inevitability impractical for MAV application, it was discovered that a point local Coefficient of Pressure (Cp) held high correlation to the chord-wise Cp integration and allowed for a linear relationship to be formed between the two variables. The defined relationship provided a 95% confidence for angles of attack below stall and can be used to estimate the integrated cord-wise pressure coefficient at a particular span wise location. The relationship between a single pressure tap and the integrated Cp of that chord-wise section was valid for each two different span-wise locations with similar defining equations. As one pressure tap can be used to adequately estimate the integrated Cp on a chord-wise wing section, a limited amount of pressure taps across the wings span can approximate the pressure distribution across the span and approximate flight perturbations. This paper focusses on the implementation of unsteady pressure measurement and autopilot control logics for turbulence detection and mitigation.

[1]  Simon Watkins,et al.  Replication of Atmospheric Conditions for the Purpose of Testing MAVs. MAV Flight Environment Project , 2005 .

[2]  Mark A. Richardson,et al.  A Low-cost Vision Based Navigation System for Small Size Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Applications , 2013 .

[3]  Matthew Marino,et al.  Unsteady pressure sensing on a MAV wing for control inputs in turbulence , 2013 .

[4]  Mujahid Abdulrahim,et al.  DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF MORPHING MICRO AIR VEHICLES , 2004 .

[5]  John Sheridan,et al.  Dynamic Sensitivity to Atmospheric Turbulence of Unmanned Air Vehicles with Varying Configuration , 2010 .

[6]  S Watkins,et al.  Optimum location of pressure measurements around a wing as a dynamic control input in smooth and turbulent conditions , 2012 .

[7]  Sophocles J. Orfanidis,et al.  Introduction to signal processing , 1995 .

[8]  Caleb White,et al.  Span-wise wind fluctuations in open terrain as applicable to small flying craft , 2011, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[9]  Simon Watkins,et al.  Dynamic calibration of pressure measurement systems: an improved method , 2012 .

[10]  Alessandro Gardi,et al.  Novel Flight Management System for Real-Time 4-Dimensional Trajectory Based Operations , 2013 .

[11]  S Dhawan Bird flight , 1992 .

[12]  Alessandro Gardi,et al.  4-Dimensional Trajectory Negotiation and Validation System for the Next Generation Air Traffic Management , 2013 .

[13]  Sridhar Ravi,et al.  The influence of turbulence on a flat plate aerofoil at Reynolds numbers relevant to MAVs , 2011 .

[14]  Alessandro Gardi,et al.  Avionics sensor fusion for small size unmanned aircraft Sense-and-Avoid , 2014, 2014 IEEE Metrology for Aerospace (MetroAeroSpace).

[15]  D. F. Kostishack,et al.  Micro Air Vehicles for Optical Surveillance , 1999 .

[16]  H. Bergh,et al.  Theoretical and experimental results for the dynamic response of pressure measuring systems , 1965 .

[17]  Alessandro Gardi,et al.  Low-cost sensors data fusion for small size unmanned aerial vehicles navigation and guidance , 2013 .

[18]  John Sheridan,et al.  An overview of experiments on the dynamic sensitivity of MAVs to turbulence , 2010 .