Dedicated Breast Computed Tomography With a Photon-Counting Detector: Initial Results of Clinical In Vivo Imaging.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this work is to present the data obtained from the first clinical in vivo application of a new dedicated spiral breast computed tomography (B-CT) equipped with a photon-counting detector. MATERIALS AND METHODS The institutional review board approved this retrospective study. Twelve women referred for breast cancer screening were included and underwent bilateral spiral B-CT acquired in prone position. Additional sonography was performed in case of dense breast tissue or any B-CT findings. In 3 women, previous mammography was available for comparison. Soft tissue (ST) and high-resolution (HR) images were reconstructed. Two independent radiologists performed separately the readout for subjective image quality and for imaging findings detection. Objective image quality evaluation was performed in consensus and included spatial resolution, contrast resolution, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio. All women were asked to report about positioning comfort and overall comfort during data acquisition. RESULTS The major pectoral muscle was included in 15 breast CT scans (62.5%); glandular component was partially missing in 2 (8.3%) of the 24 scanned breasts. A thin "ring artifact" was present in all scans but had no influence on image interpretations; no other artifacts were present. Subjective image quality assessment showed excellent agreement between the 2 readers (κ = 1). Three masses were depicted in B-CT and were confirmed as simple cysts in sonography. Additional 5 simple cysts and 2 solid benign lesions were identified only in sonography. A total of 12 calcifications were depicted with a median size of 1.1 mm (interquartile range, 0.7-1.7 mm) on HR and 1.4 mm (interquartile range, 1.1-1.8 mm) on ST images. Median SNRgl, SNRfat, and contrast-to-noise ratio were significantly higher in ST than in HR reconstructions (each, P < 0.001). A mild discomfort due to positioning of the rib cage on the table was reported by 2 women (16.7%); otherwise, no discomfort was reported. CONCLUSIONS The new dedicated B-CT equipped with a photon-counting detector provides high-quality images with potential for screening of breast cancer along with minor patient discomfort.

[1]  C. Lee,et al.  Clinical importance of unilaterally enlarging lymph nodes on otherwise normal mammograms. , 1997, Radiology.

[2]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation. , 2001, Radiology.

[3]  A. Miller.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography , 2001, The Lancet.

[4]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.

[5]  Ingvar Andersson,et al.  Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials , 2002, The Lancet.

[6]  L. Tabár,et al.  Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening , 2003, The Lancet.

[7]  Julia F. Barrett,et al.  Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[8]  G Belli,et al.  Physical characteristics of five clinical systems for digital mammography. , 2007, Medical physics.

[9]  Vicki Livingstone,et al.  Interventions for relieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[10]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. , 2008, Radiology.

[11]  Ruola Ning,et al.  Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  A. Verbeek,et al.  A remarkable reduction of breast cancer deaths in screened versus unscreened women: a case-referent study , 2010, Cancer Causes & Control.

[13]  L. Tabár,et al.  Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. , 2011, Radiology.

[14]  Michaela C. C. Weigel,et al.  High-resolution spiral CT of the breast at very low dose: concept and feasibility considerations , 2011, European Radiology.

[15]  D. Altman,et al.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  Andriy I. Bandos,et al.  Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. , 2013, Radiology.

[17]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[18]  Emily F Conant,et al.  Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. , 2014, JAMA.

[19]  E. Conant,et al.  Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography in Dense and Nondense Breasts. , 2016, JAMA.

[20]  Christian Steiding,et al.  Technical feasibility proof for high-resolution low-dose photon-counting CT of the breast , 2017, European Radiology.

[21]  Yao-pan Wu,et al.  The utility of breast cone-beam computed tomography, ultrasound, and digital mammography for detecting malignant breast tumors: A prospective study with 212 patients. , 2016, European journal of radiology.

[22]  R. Semelka,et al.  Gadolinium Deposition in Humans: When Did We Learn That Gadolinium Was Deposited In Vivo? , 2016, Investigative radiology.

[23]  E. Ritman,et al.  Human Imaging With Photon Counting–Based Computed Tomography at Clinical Dose Levels: Contrast-to-Noise Ratio and Cadaver Studies , 2016, Investigative radiology.

[24]  D Origgi,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: Dose and image quality assessment. , 2017, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[25]  Uwe Fischer,et al.  Review of clinical studies and first clinical experiences with a commercially available cone-beam breast CT in Europe. , 2017, Clinical imaging.

[26]  Uwe Fischer,et al.  The role of cone-beam breast-CT for breast cancer detection relative to breast density , 2017, European Radiology.

[27]  Artifacts Caused by Breast Tissue Markers in a Dedicated Cone-beam Breast CT in Comparison to Full-field Digital Mammography. , 2017, Academic radiology.

[28]  Wei Zhou,et al.  150-&mgr;m Spatial Resolution Using Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography Technology: Technical Performance and First Patient Images , 2018, Investigative radiology.

[29]  Uwe Fischer,et al.  Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT): clinical performance compared to mammography and MRI , 2018, European Radiology.

[30]  C. McCollough,et al.  150-μm Spatial Resolution Using Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography Technology , 2018, Investigative Radiology.

[31]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Photon Counting Computed Tomography With Dedicated Sharp Convolution Kernels: Tapping the Potential of a New Technology for Stent Imaging , 2018, Investigative radiology.

[32]  Uwe Fischer,et al.  Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT: Analysis of optimal acquisition time for discrimination of breast lesion malignancy. , 2018, European journal of radiology.

[33]  W. Moon,et al.  Supplemental Screening Breast US in Women with Negative Mammographic Findings: Effect of Routine Axillary Scanning. , 2017, Radiology.

[34]  T. Helbich,et al.  Synthetic 2-Dimensional Mammography Can Replace Digital Mammography as an Adjunct to Wide-Angle Digital Breast Tomosynthesis , 2019, Investigative radiology.