Overbooked and Overlooked: Machine Learning and Racial Bias in Medical Appointment Scheduling

Problem definition: Overbooking is commonly employed by outpatient clinics to counteract no-shows. State-of-the-art appointment scheduling systems are composed of a machine learning component, which predicts the individual patients’ no-show probability, and an optimization component, which uses these predictions to schedule appointments. The goal is to minimize the schedule cost, computed as a weighted sum of patients’ waiting time and the provider’s overtime and idle time. Academic/Practical Relevance: Despite its widespread use, we show that the objective of minimizing schedule cost may cause the patients at higher risk of no-show to experience longer waits at the clinic than the other patients. This may translate into undesirable racial disparities, as the patients’ no-show risk is typically correlated with their race. Methodology: We analytically study racial disparity in this context. Then, we propose new objective functions that minimize both schedule cost and racial disparity, and that can be readily adopted by researchers and practitioners. We develop a “race-aware” objective, which instead of minimizing the waiting times of all patients, minimizes the waiting times of the racial group expected to wait the longest. We also develop “race-unaware” methodologies that do not consider race explicitly. We validate our findings both on simulated and real-world data. Results: Motivated by the real-world case of a large specialty clinic whose black patients have a higher no-show probability than non-black patients, we demonstrate that state-of-the-art scheduling systems cause black patients to wait about 30% longer than non-black patients. Our race-aware methodology achieves both goals of eliminating racial disparity and obtaining a similar schedule cost as that obtained by the state-of-the-art scheduling method, whereas the race-unaware methodologies fail to obtain both efficiency and fairness. Managerial Implications: Our work uncovers that the traditional objective of minimizing schedule cost may lead to unintended racial disparities. Both efficiency and fairness can be achieved by adopting a race-aware objective.

[1]  Ruha Benjamin Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code , 2019, Social Forces.

[2]  John Platt,et al.  Probabilistic Outputs for Support vector Machines and Comparisons to Regularized Likelihood Methods , 1999 .

[3]  Michele Samorani,et al.  The Impact of Probabilistic Classifiers on Appointment Scheduling With No-Shows , 2019, ICIS.

[4]  Tinglong Dai,et al.  OM Forum - Healthcare Operations Management: A Snapshot of Emerging Research , 2020, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[5]  Yutian Li,et al.  Individualized No‐Show Predictions: Effect on Clinic Overbooking and Appointment Reminders , 2019, Production and Operations Management.

[6]  Michael Pinedo,et al.  Appointment scheduling with no-shows and overbooking , 2014 .

[7]  Amir Ahmadi-Javid,et al.  Outpatient appointment systems in healthcare: A review of optimization studies , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Michele Samorani,et al.  Outpatient Appointment Scheduling Given Individual Day-Dependent No-Show Predictions , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Silvio Hamacher,et al.  No-shows in appointment scheduling - a systematic literature review. , 2018, Health policy.

[10]  A. Ravi Ravindran,et al.  Optimizing outpatient appointment system using machine learning algorithms and scheduling rules: A prescriptive analytics framework , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  David R Williams,et al.  Race, socioeconomic status, and health: Complexities, ongoing challenges, and research opportunities , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  M. Howell,et al.  Ensuring Fairness in Machine Learning to Advance Health Equity , 2018, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  S. Tamang,et al.  Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data , 2018, JAMA internal medicine.

[14]  G. Brier VERIFICATION OF FORECASTS EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF PROBABILITY , 1950 .