Living with a robot companion: empirical study on the interaction with an artificial health advisor

The EU project SERA (Social Engagement with Robots and Agents) provided the unique opportunity to collect real field data of people interacting with a robot companion in their homes. In the course of three iterations, altogether six elderly participants took part. Following a multi-methodological approach, the continuous quantitative and qualitative description of user behavior on a very fine-grained level gave us insights into when and how people interacted with the robot companion. Post-trial semi-structured interviews explored how the users perceived the companion and revealed their attitudes. Based on this large data set, conclusions can be drawn on whether people show signs of bonding and how their relation to the robot develops over time. Results indicate large inter-individual differences with regard to interaction behavior and attitudes. Implications for research on companions are discussed.

[1]  Jeremy H. Wright,et al.  Automatically Training a Problematic Dialogue Predictor for a Spoken Dialogue System , 2011, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[2]  Stephanie Rosenthal,et al.  Designing robots for long-term social interaction , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[3]  Antonella De Angeli,et al.  Misuse and abuse of interactive technologies , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[4]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  Robots in the wild: Understanding long-term use , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[6]  Michael Kipp,et al.  ANVIL - a generic annotation tool for multimodal dialogue , 2001, INTERSPEECH.

[7]  Rosalind W. Picard,et al.  Establishing the computer-patient working alliance in automated health behavior change interventions. , 2005, Patient education and counseling.

[8]  Mladenka Tkalcic,et al.  Transtheoretical model of behavior change , 2011 .

[9]  Tetsuo Ono,et al.  Development and evaluation of an interactive humanoid robot "Robovie" , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[10]  M. Canada.  Misuse and Abuse of Interactive Technologies , 2006 .

[11]  O. John,et al.  Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: multitrait multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Living with Robots: Investigating the Habituation Effect in Participants' Preferences During a Longitudinal Human-Robot Interaction Study , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[13]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  “Theory of companions” What can theoretical models contribute to applications and understanding of human-robot interaction? , 2011 .

[14]  J. Guilbert,et al.  The World Health Report 2006: working together for health. , 2006, Education for health.

[15]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Humanoid robots as a passive-social medium - a field experiment at a train station , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[16]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships , 2005, TCHI.

[17]  Soumaya Ben Allouch,et al.  Acceptance and use of a zoomorphic robot in a domestic setting , 2010 .