Comparative study of superconducting gravimeters and broadband seismometers STS-1/Z in seismic and subseismic frequency bands.

Abstract Superconducting gravimeters and broadband seismometers (vertical component) both measure gravity, but whereas the former are most sensitive to very long period signals (gravity tides with periods longer than 6 h), the latter are designed for recording the seismic band (elastic normal modes with periods shorter than 1 h). We investigate here the behaviour of each type of instrument in the spectral band where it is not generally used. More precisely, we compare the French superconducting gravimeter, located at Station J9 near Strasbourg, and the vertical component of an STS-1 seismometer located in a mine at Echery (ECH) in the Vosges, about 70 km away. Two different frequency bands are considered: the seismic band (frequencies between 0.2 and 1.667 mHz), for the study of normal modes after the Bolivian earthquake of 9 June 1994, and the subseismic band (frequencies lower than 0.2 mHz), including the study of gravity tides. The analysis of Fourier amplitude spectra and power spectral densities shows the obvious result that the broadband seismometer is more sensitive than the superconducting gravimeter in the seismic band because of a lower noise level, whereas the reverse is true in the subseismic band. The poorer quality of the gravimeter record in the seismic band is probably due to site effects (sediments vs. bedrock) rather than of instrumental origin. In contrast, the higher noise level of the seismometer in the subseimic band is probably due to the temperature response of the instrument. It is expected that operating the STS-1 isothermally, or recording on-site temperature changes for correction will considerably improve its signal-to-noise ratio in the subseimic band. In comparison with recent mean models of high and low seismic background noise levels, both instruments nevertheless indicate low noise levels at all frequencies.

[1]  F. Gilbert,et al.  An application of normal mode theory to the retrieval of structural parameters and source mechanisms from seismic spectra , 1975, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[2]  B. Valette,et al.  Preliminary spectral analysis of the residual signal of a superconducting gravimeter for periods shorter than one day , 1991 .

[3]  E. Wielandt,et al.  The leaf-spring seismometer: Design and performance , 1982 .

[4]  J. Hinderer,et al.  Effective barometric admittance and gravity residuals , 1995 .

[5]  J. Hinderer,et al.  Noise limitations in the core-mode band of superconducting gravimeter data , 1995 .

[6]  J. Wahr,et al.  Constraining core undertones using stacked IDA gravity records , 1991 .

[7]  W. Zürn,et al.  High quality data from La Coste-Romberg gravimeters with electrostatic feedback : A challenge for superconducting gravimeters , 1991 .

[8]  J. Hinderer,et al.  The search for weak harmonic signals in a spectrum with application to gravity data , 1995 .

[9]  J. Hinderer,et al.  Identification of quarter-diurnal tidal waves in Superconducting Gravimeter Data , 1995 .

[10]  Véronique Dehant,et al.  Tidal Parameters for An Inelastic Earth , 1987 .

[11]  D. E. Smylie,et al.  The product spectra of gravity and barometric pressure in Europe , 1993 .

[12]  A. T. Doodson.  The Harmonic Development of the Tide-Generating Potential , 1921 .

[13]  J. Hinderer,et al.  A search for the Slichter triplet in superconducting gravimeter data , 1995 .

[14]  H. Wenzel.  Earth tide analysis package ETERNA 3.0 , 1994 .

[15]  A two-year comparison between the French and Canadian superconducting gravimeter data , 1994 .

[16]  J. Peterson,et al.  Observations and modeling of seismic background noise , 1993 .

[17]  P. Melchior.  The tides of the planet earth /2nd edition/ , 1983 .

[18]  J. Faller,et al.  On the calibration of a superconducting gravimeter using absolute gravity measurements , 1991 .

[19]  Peter M. Shearer,et al.  Constraints on upper mantle discontinuities from observations of long-period reflected and converted phases , 1991 .

[20]  F. Klopping,et al.  From Chandler wobble to free oscillations: comparison of cryogenic gravimeters and other instruments in a wide period range , 1995 .

[21]  Paul Melchior,et al.  The Tides of Planet Earth , 1978 .

[22]  P. Lognonné,et al.  The effects of the atmospheric pressure changes on seismic signals or how to improve the quality of a station , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[23]  D. E. Smylie.  The Inner Core Translational Triplet and the Density Near Earth's Center , 1992, Science.

[24]  Y. Tamura.  A harmonic development of the tide-generating potential , 1987 .

[25]  J. Hinderer,et al.  Performance of Wielandt-Streckeisen STS-1 seismometers in the tidal domain—preliminary results , 1994 .

[26]  W. Zürn,et al.  On noise reduction in vertical seismic records below 2 mHz using local barometric pressure , 1995 .