Furthering Distributed Participative Design
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Clay Spinuzzi,et al. The Methodology of Participatory Design , 2005 .
[2] David E. Avison,et al. Is IS an intellectual subject? , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[3] Alan R. Dennis. Relevance in Information Systems Research , 2001, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[4] P. Järvinen. Action Research is Similar to Design Science , 2007 .
[5] G. Böhme. The Social Function of Cognitive Structures: A Concept of the Scientific Community Within A Theory of Action , 1975 .
[6] Allen S. Lee. Action is an Artifact , 2007 .
[7] Sandeep Purao,et al. Being Proactive: Where Action Research Meets Design Research , 2005, ICIS.
[8] Richard Baskerville,et al. Diversity in information systems action research methods , 1998 .
[9] Rudy Hirschheim,et al. Crisis in the IS Field? A Critical Reflection on the State of the Discipline , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[10] Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al. Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..
[11] Jesper Simonsen,et al. MUST: A Method for Participatory Design , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..
[12] Robert M. Davison,et al. Principles of canonical action research , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..
[13] K. Lewin. Frontiers in Group Dynamics , 1947 .
[14] Albert L. Lederer,et al. Information systems planning in a turbulent environment , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[15] Thomas H. Davenport,et al. Rigor vs. relevance revisited: response to Benbasat and Zmud , 1999 .
[16] Omar El Sawy,et al. Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..
[17] Peter Checkland,et al. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .
[18] Michael D. Myers,et al. A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..
[19] Mary Lacity,et al. Understanding Qualitative Data: A Framework of Text Analysis Methods , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[20] Jesper Simonsen,et al. Participatory Design at a Radio Station , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).
[21] Erran Carmel,et al. PD and joint application design: a transatlantic comparison , 1993, CACM.
[22] Andrew Clement,et al. Computing at work: empowering action by “low-level users” , 1994, CACM.
[23] Nikos I. Karacapilidis,et al. A knowledge centred framework for collaborative business process modelling , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..
[24] P. Clark. Action research and organizational change , 1972 .
[25] Meurig Beynon,et al. A Conception of Computing Technology Better Suited to Distributed Participatory Design , 2006 .
[26] Allen S. Lee. Rigor and relevance in MIS research: beyond the approach of positivism alone , 1999 .
[27] Peter G. W. Keen,et al. Decision support systems : an organizational perspective , 1978 .
[28] Michael J. Muller,et al. Participatory design , 1993, CACM.
[29] Klaus Krippendorff,et al. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .
[30] F. Herzberg. Work and the nature of man , 1967 .
[31] José María Bernardo Paniagua,et al. Critical discourse analysis of media texts , 2007 .
[32] K. Lewin. Frontiers in Group Dynamics , 1947 .
[33] Shirley Gregor,et al. An Information Systems Design Theory for e-Learning , 2004, ACIS.
[34] C. Argyris,et al. Argyris, Chris, Robert Putnam, and Diane Maclain Smith, Action Science: Concepts, Methods, and Skills for Research and Intervention . San Franciso: Jossey-Bass, 1985. , 1985 .
[35] Andrew Warr,et al. Distributed participatory design , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.
[36] Clay Spinuzzi,et al. Lost in the Translation: Shifting Claims in the Migration of a Research Technique , 2005 .
[37] Paul Labrogere. Com 2.0: A path towards web communicating applications , 2008 .
[38] Richard T. Vidgen,et al. Constructing a web information system development methodology , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..
[39] Susanne Bødker,et al. Creating Conditions for Participation: Conflicts and Resources in Systems Development , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..
[40] David Arnott,et al. Cognitive biases and decision support systems development: a design science approach , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..
[41] M. Mulkay. Science and the sociology of knowledge , 1979 .
[42] Ellen S. O’Connor. The Politics of Management Thought: A Case Study of the Harvard Business School and The Human Relations School , 1999 .
[43] G. Susman,et al. An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .
[44] Martin Bichler,et al. Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..
[45] Michael J. Gallivan,et al. Trust, control and the role of interorganizational systems in electronic partnerships , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..
[46] Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al. Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..
[47] M. Hult,et al. TOWARDS A DEFINITION OF ACTION RESEARCH: A NOTE AND BIBLIOGRAPHY , 1980 .
[48] Blake Ives,et al. Information Technology and Corporate Strategy: A View from the Top , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..
[49] Pertti Järvinen,et al. SERIES OF PUBLICATIONS D – NET PUBLICATIONS , 2005 .
[50] Robert J. Kauffman,et al. 50th Anniversary Article: The Evolution of Research on Information Systems: A Fiftieth-Year Survey of the Literature in Management Science , 2004, Manag. Sci..
[51] Richard Baskerville,et al. What design science is not , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[52] Hanne Nørreklit. The Balanced Scorecard: what is the score? A rhetorical analysis of the Balanced Scorecard , 2003 .
[53] R. Baskerville. Conducting action research: high risk and high reward in theory and practice , 2001 .
[54] Björn Niehaves,et al. On Epistemological Pluralism in Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..
[55] Andrew Warr. Situated and Distributed Design , 2006 .
[56] Jeff Axup,et al. Participatory Design and Action Research: Identical Twins or Synergetic Pair? , 2006 .
[57] Salvatore T. March,et al. Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..
[58] H. Franssila. Feasibility of iterative design as a challenge in distributed participatory design lifecycle , 2007 .
[59] Pelle Ehn,et al. Work-oriented design of computer artifacts , 1989 .
[60] Juhani Iivari,et al. A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..
[61] Edward Toomer,et al. Qualitative Methods in Management Research , 1989 .
[62] G. Mead. The Social Self. , 2011, Psychiatry.
[63] Rikard Lindgren,et al. Design Principles for Competence Management Systems: A Synthesis of an Action Research Study , 2004, MIS Q..
[64] Jonny Holmström. Theorizing in IS research: What comes first and what comes after? , 2005 .
[65] Izak Benbasat,et al. Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..
[66] Maurice Landry,et al. Can the field of MIS be disciplined? , 1989, CACM.
[67] Donald A. Schön,et al. Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .
[68] John F. Rockart,et al. IS Research Relevance Revisited: Subtle Accomplishment, Unfulfilled Promise, or Serial Hypocrisy? , 2002, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[69] S. Deetz. Crossroads---Describing Differences in Approaches to Organization Science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and Their Legacy , 1996 .
[70] Euripidis N. Loukis,et al. Computer-supported G2G collaboration for public policy and decision-making , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..
[71] Robert Winter,et al. Design science research in Europe , 2008 .
[72] Kaj Grønbæk,et al. Cooperative design: techniques and experiences from the Scandinavian scene , 1995 .
[73] Melanie Wilson,et al. Participation: 'Bounded Freedom' or Hidden Constraints on User Involvement , 2003 .
[74] Jørn Braa,et al. The Struggle for District-Based Health Information Systems in South Africa , 2002, Inf. Soc..
[75] J. Swan,et al. Professional media and management fashion: The case of knowledge management , 2005 .
[76] Gondy Leroy,et al. Using a Digital Library of Images for Communication: Comparison of a Card-Based System to PDA Software , 2006 .
[77] E. Vaara,et al. Justification, Legitimization and Naturalization of Mergers and Acquisitions: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Media Texts , 2002 .
[78] R. Rapoport. Three Dilemmas in Action Research , 1970 .
[79] Andrew Clement,et al. A retrospective look at PD projects , 1993, CACM.
[80] Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al. Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other? , 2001, MIS Q..
[81] Debra Howcroft,et al. Paradoxes of participatory practices: the Janus role of the systems developer , 2003, Inf. Organ..
[82] David Dunne,et al. Design Thinking and How It Will Change Management Education: An Interview and Discussion , 2006 .
[83] Ellen S. O’Connor. Paradoxes of Participation: Textual Analysis and Organizational Change , 1995 .
[84] Juhani Iivari,et al. A paradigmatic analysis of contemporary schools of IS development , 1991 .
[85] S. Haack. The Pragmatist Theory of Truth , 1976, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[86] Enid Mumford,et al. The story of socio‐technical design: reflections on its successes, failures and potential , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..
[87] K. Lewin. Action Research and Minority Problems , 1946 .
[88] Pierre Bourdieu,et al. Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.
[89] J. R. G. Wood,et al. A further exploration into information systems development: the evolution of Multiview2 , 1998, Inf. Technol. People.
[90] Lakshmi S. Iyer,et al. A Semantic Approach to Secure Collaborative Inter-Organizational eBusiness Processes (SSCIOBP) , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[91] M. Kyng,et al. Participatory Design in Health Sciences: Using Cooperative Experimental Methods in Developing Health Services and Computer Technology , 2007, Qualitative health research.
[92] Sandeep Purao,et al. Exploring the Limits of the Possible , 2007 .
[93] William L. Anderson,et al. Engineering practice and codevelopment of codevelopment of product prototypes , 1993, CACM.
[94] A. Kornhauser. The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization. , 1934 .
[95] Brian Fitzgerald,et al. Towards dissolution of the is research debate: from polarization to polarity , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..
[96] Les Gasser,et al. A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..
[97] Guy Fitzgerald. Information systems: a subject with a particular perspective, no more, no less , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[98] Judy McKay,et al. The dual imperatives of action research , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.
[99] Kaj Grønbæk,et al. CSCW challenges: cooperative design in engineering projects , 1993, CACM.
[100] Trevor Wood-Harper,et al. Multiview - An Exploration in Information Systems Development , 1986, Aust. Comput. J..
[101] Steven R. Haynes,et al. DESIGN KNOWLEDGE AS A LEARNING RESOURCE , 2006 .
[102] Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn,et al. Metaphors and Meaning: An Intercultural Analysis of the Concept of Teamwork , 2001 .
[103] A. Figueiredo,et al. Action Research and Design in Information Systems: Two Faces of a Single Coin , 2006 .
[104] N. Phillips,et al. The Birth of the 'Kodak Moment': Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Adoption of New Technologies , 2005 .
[105] Trevor Wood-Harper,et al. A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..
[106] Richard Baskerville,et al. Investigating Information Systems with Action Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[107] Øystein Foros. Price Strategies and Compatibility in Digital Networks , 2007 .
[108] Richard Baskerville,et al. Special issue on action research in information systems: making is research relevant to practice--foreword , 2004 .
[109] Susanne Bødker,et al. Creating conditions for participation: Conflicts and resources in systems design , 1994 .
[110] P. Prasad,et al. Stretching the Iron Cage: The Constitution and Implications of Routine Workplace Resistance , 2000 .
[111] C. Cahill. Including excluded perspectives in participatory action research , 2007 .
[112] P. Asaro. Transforming society by transforming technology: the science and politics of participatory design , 2000 .
[113] G. Ritzer. Sociology : A Multiple Paradigm Science , 1975 .
[114] David E. Avison,et al. Action research , 1999, CACM.
[115] Jay F. Nunamaker,et al. Systems Development in Information Systems Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[116] Herbert A. Simon,et al. The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .
[117] William L. Anderson,et al. Engineering practice and codevelopment of product prototypes , 1993 .
[118] K. Lewin,et al. Resolving Social Conflicts , 1948 .
[119] R. Daft,et al. Can Organization Studies Begin to Break Out of the Normal Science Straitjacket? An Editorial Essay , 1990 .
[120] Samir Chatterjee,et al. Design of emerging digital services: a taxonomy , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[121] Gert-Jan de Vreede,et al. Field Experiences with eXtreme Programming: Developing an Emergency Response System , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[122] Jan Pries-Heje,et al. A multiple‐theory analysis of a diffusion of information technology case , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..
[123] Michael Foster. An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Action Research in Work Organizations , 1972 .
[124] A. V. D. Ven,et al. Knowledge for Theory and Practice , 2006 .
[125] Gerhard Fischer,et al. Distributed-PD: challenges and opportunities , 2008, PDC.
[126] Leela Damodaran,et al. User involvement in the systems design process-a practical guide for users , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..
[127] Richard T. Vidgen,et al. Stakeholders, soft systems and technology: separation and mediation in the analysis of information system requirements , 1997, Inf. Syst. J..
[128] Gerhard Schmidt,et al. Out of Scandinavia: Alternative Approaches to Software Design and System Development , 1989, Hum. Comput. Interact..
[129] A. Maslow. Motivation and Personality , 1954 .
[130] H. Bernard,et al. Text Analysis: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods , 1998 .
[131] J. Dewey. Logic, the theory of inquiry , 1938 .