Artificial neural network analysis of noisy visual field data in glaucoma

This paper reports on the application of an artificial neural network to the clinical analysis of ophthalmological data. In particular a 2-dimensional Kohonen self-organising feature map (SOM) is used to analyse visual field data from glaucoma patients. Importantly, the paper addresses the problem of how the SOM can be utilised to accommodate the noise within the data. This is a particularly important problem within longitudinal assessment, where detecting significant change is the crux of the problem in clinical diagnosis. Data from 737 glaucomatous visual field records (Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer, program 24-2) are used to train a SOM with 25 nodes organised on a square grid. The SOM clusters the data organising the output map such that fields with early and advanced loss are at extreme positions, with a continuum of change in place and extent of loss represented by the intervening nodes. For each SOM node 100 variants, generated by a computer simulation modelling the variability that might be expected in a glaucomatous eye, are also classified by the network to establish the extent of noise upon classification. Field change is then measured with respect to classification of a subsequent field, outside the area defined by the original field and its variants. The significant contribution of this paper is that the spatial analysis of the field data, which is provided by the SOM, has been augmented with noise analysis enhancing the visual representation of longitudinal data and enabling quantification of significant class change.

[1]  J Flammer,et al.  Differential light threshold. Short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma. , 1984, Archives of ophthalmology.

[2]  E. Aulhorn,et al.  Early Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma , 1967 .

[3]  Georg Lindgren,et al.  A package for the statistical analysis of visual fields , 1987 .

[4]  J. D. Tompkins,et al.  Characteristics of frequency-of-seeing curves in normal subjects, patients with suspected glaucoma, and patients with glaucoma. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  D B Henson,et al.  Spatial classification of glaucomatous visual field loss. , 1996, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  J Flammer,et al.  Quantification of glaucomatous visual field defects with automated perimetry. , 1985, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  A Heijl,et al.  Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. , 1989, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  G. Lindgren,et al.  Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. , 1987, Archives of ophthalmology.

[9]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organization and Associative Memory , 1988 .

[10]  D B Henson,et al.  Visual field test simulation and error in threshold estimation. , 1996, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  D B Henson,et al.  Influence of fixation accuracy on threshold variability in patients with open angle glaucoma. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  Xiaohui Liu,et al.  Identifying the measurement noise in glaucomatous testing: an artificial neural network approach , 1994, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[13]  A Heijl,et al.  Glaucoma Hemifield Test. Automated visual field evaluation. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[14]  J. Weber,et al.  The properties of perimetric thresholds in normal and glaucomatous eyes. , 1992, German journal of ophthalmology.