An Ontology of Nature with Local Causality, Parallel Lives, and Many Relative Worlds

Parallel lives (PL) is an ontological model of nature in which quantum mechanics and special relativity are unified in a single universe with a single space-time. Point-like objects called lives are the only fundamental objects in this space-time, and they propagate at or below c, and interact with one another only locally at point-like events in space-time, very much like classical point particles. Lives are not alive in any sense, nor do they possess consciousness or any agency to make decisions—they are simply point objects which encode memory at events in space-time. The only causes and effects in the universe occur when lives meet locally, and thus the causal structure of interaction events in space-time is Lorentz invariant. Each life traces a continuous world-line through space-time, and experiences its own relative world, fully defined by the outcomes of past events along its world-line (never superpositions), which are encoded in its external memory. A quantum field comprises a continuum of lives throughout space-time, and familiar physical systems like particles each comprise a sub-continuum of the lives of the field. Each life carries a hidden internal memory containing a local relative wavefunction, which is a local piece of a pure universal wavefunction, but it is the relative wavefunctions in the local memories throughout space-time which are physically real in PL, and not the universal wavefunction in configuration space. Furthermore, while the universal wavefunction tracks the average behavior of the lives of a system, it fails to track their individual dynamics and trajectories. There is always a preferred separable basis, and for an irreducible physical system, each orthogonal term in this basis is a different relative world—each containing some fraction of the lives of the system. The relative wavefunctions in the lives’ internal memories govern which lives of different systems can meet during future local interactions, and thereby enforce entanglement correlations—including Bell inequality violations. These, and many other details, are explored here, but several aspects of this framework are not yet fleshed out, and work is ongoing.

[1]  J. Hsu Space-time translational gauge identities in Abelian Yang-Mills gravity , 2012, 1203.4546.

[2]  Gilles Brassard,et al.  Parallel Lives: A Local-Realistic Interpretation of “Nonlocal” Boxes , 2017, Entropy.

[3]  M. Scully,et al.  Quantum eraser: A proposed photon correlation experiment concerning observation and , 1982 .

[4]  A. Robinson Non-standard analysis , 1966 .

[5]  C. G. Timpson Nonlocality and Information Flow: The Approach of Deutsch and Hayden , 2003 .

[6]  Communication: quantum mechanics without wavefunctions. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[7]  M. Gell-Mann,et al.  Decoherent Histories Quantum Mechanics with One 'Real' Fine-Grained History , 2011, 1106.0767.

[8]  M. Waegell Locally causal and deterministic interpretations of quantum mechanics: parallel lives and cosmic inflation , 2016, 1604.07874.

[9]  E. Perkins NONSTANDARD METHODS IN STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS AND MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS , 1988 .

[10]  S. Popescu,et al.  Quantum nonlocality as an axiom , 1994 .

[11]  Roderich Tumulka,et al.  Many Worlds and Schrödinger’s First Quantum Theory , 2009, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[12]  D. Bohm,et al.  Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory , 1959 .

[13]  Jeffrey A. Barrett,et al.  Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 2009, Compendium of Quantum Physics.

[14]  W. Zurek Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical—Revisited , 2003, quant-ph/0306072.

[15]  Basil J. Hiley,et al.  Non-commutative Geometry, the Bohm Interpretation and the Mind-Matter Relationship * . , 2001 .

[16]  P. Holland,et al.  The Quantum Theory of Motion: An Account of the de Broglie-Bohm Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 1993 .

[17]  N. David Mermin,et al.  Is the Moon There When Nobody Looks? Reality and the Quantum Theory , 1985 .

[18]  J. Dressel Weak Values as Interference Phenomena , 2014, 1410.0943.

[19]  David Wallace,et al.  Quantum Mechanics on Spacetime I: Spacetime State Realism , 2009, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[20]  Charles T. Sebens,et al.  Self-locating Uncertainty and the Origin of Probability in Everettian Quantum Mechanics , 2014, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[21]  E. Wigner On Hidden Variables and Quantum Mechanical Probabilities , 1970 .

[22]  H. Wiseman,et al.  Quantum phenomena modelled by interactions between many classical worlds , 2014, 1402.6144.

[23]  M. Schlosshauer Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics , 2003, quant-ph/0312059.

[24]  Lipo Wang,et al.  Quantum mechanics without wave functions , 1988 .

[25]  C. Fuchs,et al.  A Quantum-Bayesian Route to Quantum-State Space , 2009, 0912.4252.

[26]  Ruediger Schack,et al.  Quantum-Bayesian Coherence , 2009, 1301.3274.

[27]  Chris Doran,et al.  Gravity as a Gauge Theory in the Spacetime Algebra , 1993 .

[28]  Yakir Aharonov,et al.  Quantum Paradoxes: Quantum Theory for the Perplexed , 2005 .

[29]  C. Timpson,et al.  Bell on Bell's theorem: The changing face of nonlocality , 2014, 1501.03521.

[30]  A model of unified quantum chromodynamics and Yang-Mills gravity , 2011, 1108.2423.

[31]  I. Stamatescu,et al.  Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory , 1996 .

[32]  Gilles Brassard,et al.  The equivalence of local-realistic and no-signalling theories , 2017, 1710.01380.

[33]  David Deutsch,et al.  Information flow in entangled quantum systems , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[34]  W. Zurek Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical , 2001, quant-ph/0105127.

[35]  Robert W. Spekkens,et al.  Einstein, Incompleteness, and the Epistemic View of Quantum States , 2007, 0706.2661.

[36]  E. Madelung,et al.  Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer Form , 1927 .

[37]  Hugh Everett,et al.  The Theory of the Universal Wave Function , 2015 .

[38]  David Hestenes,et al.  Gauge Theory Gravity with Geometric Calculus , 2005 .

[39]  Gilles Brassard,et al.  Can Free Will Emerge from Determinism in Quantum Theory , 2012, 1204.2128.

[40]  David Wallace,et al.  Everett and structure , 2001 .

[41]  J. Mehra Letters on Wave Mechanics , 1999 .

[42]  N. David Mermin,et al.  An introduction to QBism with an application to the locality of quantum mechanics , 2013, 1311.5253.

[43]  David Wallace,et al.  Worlds in the Everett interpretation , 2001, quant-ph/0103092.

[44]  R. Spekkens Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements , 2004, quant-ph/0406166.

[45]  R. Griffiths Consistent Quantum Theory , 2001 .

[46]  Vaidman,et al.  How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100. , 1988, Physical review letters.

[47]  Travis Norsen,et al.  Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: An Exploration of the Physical Meaning of Quantum Theory , 2017 .

[48]  W. H. Zurek Algorithmic Information Content, Church — Turing Thesis, Physical Entropy, and Maxwell’s Demon , 1991 .

[49]  S. Wehner,et al.  Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres , 2015, Nature.

[50]  Shih,et al.  Delayed "Choice" quantum eraser , 1999, Physical review letters.

[51]  B. S. Cirel'son Quantum generalizations of Bell's inequality , 1980 .

[52]  J. Hsu A Unified Gravity-Electroweak Model Based on a Generalized Yang-Mills Framework , 2011, 1106.2121.

[53]  J. Bell On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics , 1966 .

[54]  J. Bell,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Preface to the first edition , 2004 .

[55]  J. Bell,et al.  The Theory of Local Beables , 1975 .

[56]  L. Vaidman,et al.  Quantum mechanical interaction-free measurements , 1993, hep-th/9305002.

[57]  Bryce S. DeWitt,et al.  The Many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2015 .

[58]  N. Bohr II - Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[59]  Erkki J. Brändas,et al.  Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory : E. Joos, H. D. Zeh, C. Kiefer, D. Giulini, J. Kupsch and I.-O Stamatescu, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003 , 2004 .

[60]  H. Everett "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics , 1957 .

[61]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  Determinism Is Ontic, Determinability is Epistemic , 2001 .

[62]  A. Kent,et al.  Many worlds? : Everett, quantum theory, and reality , 2010 .

[63]  E. Wigner Remarks on the Mind-Body Question , 1995 .

[64]  A. Lasenby,et al.  Gravity, gauge theories and geometric algebra , 1998, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[65]  D. Bohm A SUGGESTED INTERPRETATION OF THE QUANTUM THEORY IN TERMS OF "HIDDEN" VARIABLES. II , 1952 .

[66]  A. Einstein Relativity: The Special and the General Theory , 2015 .

[67]  Ian D. Lawrie,et al.  The emergent multiverse – quantum theory according to the Everett interpretation , 2016 .

[68]  Multidimensional quantum trajectories: applications of the derivative propagation method. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[69]  D. Wallace Decoherence and Ontology, or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love FAPP , 2011, 1111.2189.

[70]  David A. Micha,et al.  Quantum dynamics with trajectories. Introduction to quantum hydrodynamics , 2006 .

[71]  D. Hestenes Gauge Gravity and Electroweak Theory , 2008, 0807.0060.

[72]  J. Hsu YANG–MILLS GRAVITY IN FLAT SPACE–TIME I: CLASSICAL GRAVITY WITH TRANSLATION GAUGE SYMMETRY , 2006, 1102.2010.

[73]  Barry Loewer,et al.  Interpreting the many worlds interpretation , 1988, Synthese.