Plant persistence traits in fire-prone ecosystems of the Mediterranean basin: a phylogenetic approach

The two main fire response traits found in the Mediterranean basin are the resprouting capacity (R) and the propagule-persistence capacity (P). Previous studies suggested that these two traits might be correlated. In this paper we first test whether R and P have evolved independently. Then, we ask if the correlation occurs because (a) one trait is not the target of selection but it is genetically linked to the other trait which is the one under selection pressure (indirect selection), or (b) because different evolutionary responses to the same selective pressure are acting in parallel on populations at different genetic starting points (parallel selection). Finally, we test to what extent resprouting is associated with some vegetative and reproductive traits. To answer these questions we used a traits database for the eastern Iberian Peninsula and we assembled the phylogenetic tree on the basis of published information. The results indicate that the two traits are negatively associated and support the parallel selection scenario in which changes in R precedes changes in P. The phylogenetic–informed associations of resprouting with other traits (plant height, age at maturity) support the existence of allocation tradeoffs. The results are consistent with the biogeographical history of the Mediterranean basin flora where most of lineages already resprouted to persist after a disturbance during the Tertiary, thus making it improbable that an additional costly persistence strategy would evolve under the Quaternary climatic conditions.

[1]  Juli G. Pausas,et al.  Mediterranean vegetation dynamics: modelling problems and functional types , 2004, Plant Ecology.

[2]  S. Gould,et al.  Ontogeny and Phylogeny , 1978 .

[3]  E. Paradis,et al.  Analysis of comparative data using generalized estimating equations. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  Juli G. Pausas,et al.  A hierarchical deductive approach for functional types in disturbed ecosystems , 2003 .

[5]  B. Lamont,et al.  Are seed set and speciation rates always low among species that resprout after fire, and why? , 2003, Evolutionary Ecology.

[6]  Martins,et al.  Adaptation and the comparative method. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  L. Trabaud,et al.  Heat Requirements for Seed Germination of Three Cistus Species in the Garrigue of Southern France , 1989 .

[8]  Takuya Kubo,et al.  Optimal size of storage for recovery after unpredictable disturbances , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[9]  Jacques Roy,et al.  Germination and Population Dynamics of Cistus Species in Relation to Fire , 1992 .

[10]  P. García‐Fayos,et al.  ‘Convergent’ traits of mediterranean woody plants belong to pre-mediterranean lineages , 2003 .

[11]  J. Pate,et al.  Growth and Fire Response of Selected Epacridaceae of South-Western Australia , 1996 .

[12]  T. Bell,et al.  Underground starch storage in Erica species of the Cape Floristic Region – differences between seeders and resprouters , 1999 .

[13]  Juli G. Pausas,et al.  Resprouting of Quercus suber in NE Spain after fire. , 1997 .

[14]  C. Thanos Fire-followers in chaparral : Nitrogenous compounds trigger seed germination , 1995 .

[15]  John L. Harper,et al.  Population Biology of Plants. , 1978 .

[16]  C. Yates,et al.  Impact of two wildfires on endemic granite outcrop vegetation in Western Australia , 2003 .

[17]  M. Leishman Does the seed size/number trade‐off model determine plant community structure? An assessment of the model mechanisms and their generality , 2001 .

[18]  W. Kress,et al.  Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences , 2000 .

[19]  P. Verrell,et al.  All are one and one is all: sexual uniformity among widely separated populations of the North American seal salamander, Desmognathus monticola , 2003 .

[20]  Jon E. Keeley,et al.  PLANT FUNCTIONAL TRAITS IN RELATION TO FIRE IN CROWN-FIRE ECOSYSTEMS , 2004 .

[21]  W. Bond,et al.  Ecology of sprouting in woody plants: the persistence niche. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  M. Pagel Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  The Ecology and Economics of Storage in Plants , 1990 .

[24]  M. Westoby,et al.  Vertebrate‐dispersed species in a fire‐prone environment , 1996 .

[25]  V. Albert,et al.  Phylogeny and classification of Oleaceae based on rps16 and trnL-F sequence data. , 2000, American journal of botany.

[26]  P. García‐Fayos,et al.  Mexical plant phenology: is it similar to Mediterranean communities? , 2002 .

[27]  B Rannala,et al.  Accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty in evolutionary studies. , 2000, Science.

[28]  M. Verdú Ecological and evolutionary differences between Mediterranean seeders and resprouters , 2000 .

[29]  C. Herrera,et al.  Historical Effects and Sorting Processes as Explanations for Contemporary Ecological Patterns: Character Syndromes in Mediterranean Woody Plants , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[30]  J. Pate,et al.  Seedling Growth and Storage Characteristics of Seeder and Resprouter Species of Mediterranean-type Ecosystems of S. W. Australia , 1990 .

[31]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Phylogenetic Uncertainties and Sensitivity Analyses in Comparative Biology , 1996 .

[32]  K. Nixon,et al.  Phylogeny, biogeography, and processes of molecular differentiation in Quercus subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae). , 1999, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[33]  Peter J. Bellingham,et al.  Resprouting as a life history strategy in woody plant communities , 2000 .

[34]  Korbinian Strimmer,et al.  APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language , 2004, Bioinform..

[35]  J. Keeley,et al.  Energy Allocation Patterns of a Sprouting and a Nonsprouting Species of Arctostaphylos in the California Chaparral , 1977 .

[36]  J. Midgley Why the world's vegetation is not totally dominated by resprouting plants; because resprouters are shorter than reseeders , 1996 .

[37]  Richard M. Cowling,et al.  Resprouters vs reseeders in South African forest trees; a model based on forest canopy height , 1997 .

[38]  C. Herrera Deconstructing a floral phenotype: do pollinators select for corolla integration in Lavandula latifolia? , 2001 .

[39]  J. Pausas Resprouting vs seeding – a Mediterranean perspective , 2001 .

[40]  F. Lloret,et al.  Fire and resprouting in Mediterranean ecosystems: insights from an external biogeographical region, the mexical shrubland. , 1999, American journal of botany.

[41]  W. Armbruster Can indirect selection and genetic context contribute to trait diversification? A transition‐probability study of blossom‐colour evolution in two genera , 2002 .

[42]  J. Pate,et al.  Growth and Reproductive Performance of a Seeder and a Resprouter Species of Bossiaea as a Function of Plant Age After Fire , 1991 .

[43]  J. Doyle,et al.  A phylogeny of the chloroplast gene rbcL in the Leguminosae: taxonomic correlations and insights into the evolution of nodulation. , 1997, American journal of botany.

[44]  AGE AT MATURITY AND DIVERSIFICATION IN WOODY ANGIOSPERMS , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[45]  David D. Ackerly,et al.  Flammability and serotiny as strategies: correlated evolution in pines , 2001 .

[46]  J. Keeley,et al.  Reproduction of Chaparral Shrubs After Fire: A Comparison of Sprouting and Seeding Strategies , 1978 .