Quantifying Bounds of Model Gap for Synchronous Generators

In practice, uncertainties in parameters and model structures always cause a gap between a model and the corresponding physical entity. Hence, to evaluate the performance of a model, the bounds of this gap must be assessed. In this paper, we propose a trajectory-sensitivity–based approach to quantify the bounds of the gap. The trajectory sensitivity is expressed as a linear time-varying system. We thus first derive several bounds for a general linear time-varying system in different scenarios. The derived bounds are then applied to obtain bounds of the model gap for generator plant models with different types of structural information, e.g., models of different orders. Case studies are carried out to show the efficacy of the bounds through synchronous generator models on different accuracy levels.

[1]  I.A. Hiskens,et al.  Sensitivity, Approximation, and Uncertainty in Power System Dynamic Simulation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  S. Dragomir Some Gronwall Type Inequalities and Applications , 2003 .

[3]  G. Hu,et al.  The weighted logarithmic matrix norm and bounds of the matrix exponential , 2004 .

[4]  Zhenyu Huang,et al.  Generator dynamic model validation and parameter calibration using phasor measurements at the point of connection , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  Renke Huang,et al.  Calibrating Parameters of Power System Stability Models Using Advanced Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Le-Ren Chang-Chien,et al.  Practical Considerations to Calibrate Generator Model Parameters Using Phasor Measurements , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[7]  Bernard C. Lesieutre,et al.  Power system modal analysis tool developed for industry use , 2013, 2013 North American Power Symposium (NAPS).

[8]  B. C. Lesieutre,et al.  Determining power system modal content of data motivated by normal forms , 2012, 2012 North American Power Symposium (NAPS).

[9]  Model-Based Calibration Toolbox , 2013 .

[10]  J.R. Hockenberry,et al.  Evaluation of uncertainty in dynamic simulations of power system models: The probabilistic collocation method , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Heng Chen,et al.  Generator parameter validation and calibration process based on PMU data , 2016, 2016 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition (T&D).

[12]  Renke Huang,et al.  Physical parameters identification of synchronous generators by a dynamic state estimator , 2013, 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[13]  Farrokh Aminifar,et al.  Generating Unit Model Validation and Calibration Through Synchrophasor Measurements , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[14]  Shih-Min Hsu,et al.  Semiautomated Model Validation of Power Plant Equipment Using Online Measurements , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[15]  Bernard C. Lesieutre,et al.  Variable Projection Method for Power System Modal Identification , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  D. Kosterev,et al.  Hydro turbine-governor model validation in pacific northwest , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.