Causal Evidence for a Privileged Working Memory State in Early Visual Cortex

Emerging evidence suggests that items held in working memory (WM) might not all be in the same representational state. One item might be privileged over others, making it more accessible and thereby recalled with greater precision. Here, using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we provide causal evidence in human participants that items in WM are differentially susceptible to disruptive TMS, depending on their state, determined either by task relevance or serial position. Across two experiments, we applied TMS to area MT+ during the WM retention of two motion directions. In Experiment 1, we used an “incidental cue” to bring one of the two targets into a privileged state. In Experiment 2, we presented the targets sequentially so that the last item was in a privileged state by virtue of recency. In both experiments, recall precision of motion direction was differentially affected by TMS, depending on the state of the memory target at the time of disruption. Privileged items were recalled with less precision, whereas nonprivileged items were recalled with higher precision. Thus, only the privileged item was susceptible to disruptive TMS over MT+. By contrast, precision of the nonprivileged item improved either directly because of facilitation by TMS or indirectly through reduced interference from the privileged item. Our results provide a unique line of evidence, as revealed by TMS over a posterior sensory brain region, for at least two different states of item representation in WM.

[1]  R. Romo,et al.  Neuronal Population Coding of Parametric Working Memory , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Behavior-dependent short-term assembly dynamics in the medial prefrontal cortex , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  A. Nobre,et al.  Modulation of working-memory maintenance by directed attention , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Neural Evidence for a Distinction between Short-term Memory and the Focus of Attention , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  H Sompolinsky,et al.  Simple models for reading neuronal population codes. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  N. Sigala,et al.  Dynamic Coding for Cognitive Control in Prefrontal Cortex , 2013, Neuron.

[7]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A new anatomical landmark for reliable identification of human area V5/MT: a quantitative analysis of sulcal patterning. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  Jöran Lepsien,et al.  Directing spatial attention in mental representations: Interactions between attentional orienting and working-memory load , 2005, NeuroImage.

[9]  J. Silvanto,et al.  Distinct Causal Mechanisms of Attentional Guidance by Working Memory and Repetition Priming in Early Visual Cortex , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Devlin,et al.  Triple Dissociation of Faces, Bodies, and Objects in Extrastriate Cortex , 2009, Current Biology.

[11]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Synaptic mechanisms and network dynamics underlying spatial working memory in a cortical network model. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  T. Pasternak,et al.  The multiple roles of visual cortical areas MT/MST in remembering the direction of visual motion. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  The mind and brain of short-term memory. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[14]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Stimulus-Specific Delay Activity in Human Primary Visual Cortex , 2022 .

[15]  N. Zokaei Modulation of working memory , 2013 .

[16]  J. Fellous,et al.  A role for NMDA-receptor channels in working memory , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Design for a working memory. , 2009 .

[18]  Gerrit W. Maus,et al.  The perceived position of moving objects: transcranial magnetic stimulation of area MT+ reduces the flash-lag effect. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Effective Visual Working Memory Capacity: An Emergent Effect from the Neural Dynamics in an Attractor Network , 2012, PloS one.

[20]  Mark G. Stokes,et al.  Attention Modulates Maintenance of Representations in Visual Short-term Memory , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Paul M. Bays,et al.  Rapid Forgetting Prevented by Retrospective Attention Cues , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Decoding Attended Information in Short-term Memory: An EEG Study , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  N. Cowan The focus of attention as observed in visual working memory tasks: Making sense of competing claims , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Colin W G Clifford,et al.  The effect of TMS on visual motion sensitivity: an increase in neural noise or a decrease in signal strength? , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Brian McElree,et al.  Accessing Recent Events , 2006 .

[26]  David Soto,et al.  Causal evidence for subliminal percept-to-memory interference in early visual cortex , 2012, NeuroImage.

[27]  J. Gúzman-Lopéz,et al.  Visual motion adaptation increases the susceptibility of area V5/MT to phosphene induction by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[28]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas , 2009, Nature.

[29]  Adam C. Riggall,et al.  Distributed Patterns of Activity in Sensory Cortex Reflect the Precision of Multiple Items Maintained in Visual Short-Term Memory , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  B. Postle Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain , 2006, Neuroscience.

[31]  M. Tsodyks,et al.  Synaptic Theory of Working Memory , 2008, Science.

[32]  D. Heeger,et al.  Retinotopy and Functional Subdivision of Human Areas MT and MST , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  T. Pasternak,et al.  Working memory in primate sensory systems , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[35]  Razvan Pascanu,et al.  A neurodynamical model for working memory , 2011, Neural Networks.

[36]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  The temporal characteristics of motion processing in hMT/V5+: Combining fMRI and neuronavigated TMS , 2006, NeuroImage.

[37]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Dynamic Updating of Working Memory Resources for Visual Objects , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  Different States in Visual Working Memory: When It Guides Attention and When It Does Not , 2022 .

[39]  P. Goldman-Rakic Cellular basis of working memory , 1995, Neuron.

[40]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  From Distributed Resources to Limited Slots in Multiple-Item Working Memory: A Spiking Network Model with Normalization , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  W. Maass,et al.  State-dependent computations: spatiotemporal processing in cortical networks , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[42]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals the content of visual short-term memory in the visual cortex , 2010, NeuroImage.

[43]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Neurocomputational models of working memory , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  G. E. Alexander,et al.  Neuron Activity Related to Short-Term Memory , 1971, Science.

[45]  A. Nobre,et al.  Attentional modulation of object representations in working memory. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of human area MT/V5 disrupts perception and storage of the motion aftereffect , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Double dissociation of V1 and V5/MT activity in visual awareness. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[48]  V. Walsh,et al.  State-dependency in brain stimulation studies of perception and cognition , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.