A Lifestyle-Based Approach for Delivering Personalized Advertisements in Digital Interactive Television

This paper presents a lifestyle-based approach for the delivery of personalized advertisements in digital interactive television. The theoretical basis of the approach is analyzed, and two variations are discussed. The first (segmentation variation) relies on interaction-based classification of users into lifestyle segments, while the second (similarities variation) is based on the identification of similarities among users based on demographic and TV program preferences data. In both variations, the user's interest is predicted by aggregating lifestyle neighbors' preferences. Results from an empirical validation, in the form of a laboratory experiment, are also presented in order to provide further evidence on the effectiveness and usefulness of the proposed approach when compared with machine learning algorithms, such as classification and nearest neighborhood. The superiority of the proposed approach is also demonstrated against user modeling evaluation methodologies, as well as against traditional marketing targeting practices.

[1]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  Personalised hypermedia presentation techniques for improving online customer relationships , 2001, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[2]  Liliana Ardissono,et al.  Tailoring the Interaction with Users in Web Stores , 2000, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[3]  Edward Blair,et al.  Why Brands Grow , 2002, Journal of Advertising Research.

[4]  Bruce Krulwich,et al.  LIFESTYLE FINDER: Intelligent User Profiling Using Large-Scale Demographic Data , 1997, AI Mag..

[5]  David Heckerman,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Predictive Algorithms for Collaborative Filtering , 1998, UAI.

[6]  Michael J. Pazzani,et al.  Learning and Revising User Profiles: The Identification of Interesting Web Sites , 1997, Machine Learning.

[7]  John Riedl,et al.  GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews , 1994, CSCW '94.

[8]  Barrie Gunter,et al.  Consumer Profiles: An Introduction to Psychographics , 1992 .

[9]  Liliana Ardissono,et al.  An adaptive system for the personalized access to news , 2001, AI Commun..

[10]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Fab: content-based, collaborative recommendation , 1997, CACM.

[11]  Duco A. D. Das,et al.  Recommender Systems for TV , 1998 .

[12]  T Elliott Michael,et al.  CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS OF ADVERTISING CLUTTER AND ITS IMPACT ACROSS VARIOUS MEDIA , 1998 .

[13]  John Zimmerman,et al.  TV Content Recommender System , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[14]  James R. Chen,et al.  User-Centered Indexing for Adaptive Information Access , 1996 .

[15]  Joshua Alspector,et al.  Feature-based and Clique-based User Models for Movie Selection: A Comparative Study , 1997, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[16]  Judith Masthoff,et al.  Proceedings of the workshop Future TV: Adaptive instruction in your living room , 2002 .

[17]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[18]  Ingrid Zukerman,et al.  # 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Predictive Statistical Models for User Modeling , 1999 .

[19]  John Riedl,et al.  Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms , 2001, WWW '01.

[20]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  Adaptive Hypermedia , 2001, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[21]  D. Schultz,et al.  Interactive Psychographics: Cross-Selling in the Banking Industry , 2002, Journal of Advertising Research.

[22]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[23]  Sally McKechnie,et al.  The Importance of Likeability as a Measure of Television Advertising Effectiveness , 1994 .

[24]  Joseph A. Konstan Heavyweight Applications of Lightweight User Models: A Look at Collaborative Filtering, Recommender Systems, and Real-Time Personalization , 2001, User Modeling.

[25]  Thomas Bjørner The early interactive audience of a regional TV-station (DVB-T) in Denmark , 2003 .

[26]  David N. Chin Empirical Evaluation of User Models and User-Adapted Systems , 2001, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[27]  Girish N. Punj The formulation, empirical specification and testing of a model of consumer information search behavior for new automobiles , 1983 .

[28]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Nederlandse samenvatting en bewerking van 'Multivariate data analysis, 4th Edition, 1995' , 1998 .

[29]  Michael J. Pazzani,et al.  Learning Collaborative Information Filters , 1998, ICML.

[30]  Diomidis Spinellis,et al.  Information Systems in the Living Room: A Case Study of Personalized Interactive TV Design , 2001, ECIS.

[31]  Barry Smyth,et al.  A personalized television listings service , 2000, CACM.

[32]  Robert S. Lee,et al.  How and why people watch TV: implications for the future of interactive television , 1995 .

[33]  Lynn R. Kahle,et al.  Problems With Vals in International Marketing Research: an Example From an Application of the Empirical Mirror Technique , 1988 .

[34]  William A. Gale,et al.  A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers , 1994, SIGIR '94.

[35]  David L. Mothersbaugh,et al.  Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy , 1997 .

[36]  John Riedl,et al.  E-Commerce Recommendation Applications , 2004, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[37]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia , 1996, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[38]  William W. Cohen,et al.  Recommendation as Classification: Using Social and Content-Based Information in Recommendation , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.