Muscle activation patterns during two types of voluntary single-joint movement.

We examined the systematic variations in the EMG patterns during two types of single joint elbow movements. These patterns may be interpreted as exhibiting rules by which the CNS controls movement parameters. Normal human subjects performed two series of fast elbow flexion movements of 20-100 degrees in a horizontal plane manipulandum. The first series consisted of pointing movements (PMs) from an initial position to a target; the second series consisted of reversal movements (RMs) to the same targets with an immediate return to the starting position. Both series showed kinematic and electromyographic (EMG) patterns that followed our previously described speed-insensitive strategy for controlling movement distance. Kinematic patterns of PMs and RMs were identical to about the time of peak PM deceleration. Agonist EMG bursts were also initially the same, but RM bursts ended abruptly in a silent period, whereas PM bursts declined more gradually. Antagonist EMG bursts of RMs were later than those of PMs but were not larger, contrary to our prior expectation and despite the larger net extension torque during RMs. The increase in net RM extension-directed torque that takes the limb back to its initial position appears to be a consequence of reduced flexor muscle torque rather than increased extensor muscle torque. We propose that rules for movement control may be similar for different kinds of movements as long as they are functionally sufficient for the task. However, even in a single-joint movement paradigm, physics alone, that is, the knowledge of net muscle torque and limb kinematics, is not adequate to fully predict those rules or the muscle activation patterns they produce. These must be discovered by experiment. The simplest expression of such rules may not be in terms of torque or kinematic variables but rather explicitly in terms of muscle activation patterns.

[1]  L. Stark,et al.  Roles of the elements of the triphasic control signal , 1985, Experimental Neurology.

[2]  D. Corcos,et al.  Organizing principles for single-joint movements. II. A speed-sensitive strategy. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  A Computational Model of the Simplest Motor Program. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Strategies for the control of voluntary movements with one mechanical degree of freedom , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  The origin and use of positional frames of reference in motor control , 1995, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  D. M. Corcos,et al.  Common principles underlying the control of rapid, single degree-of-freedom movements at different joints , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  J. Cooke,et al.  Amplitude‐ and instruction‐dependent modulation of movement‐related electromyogram activity in humans. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  T. Flash,et al.  Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  G L Gottlieb,et al.  On the voluntary movement of compliant (inertial-viscoelastic) loads by parcellated control mechanisms. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  M L Latash,et al.  Organizing principles for single joint movements: V. Agonist-antagonist interactions. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  A. G. Feldman Superposition of motor programs—I. Rhythmic forearm movements in man , 1980, Neuroscience.

[12]  M. Hallett,et al.  EMG analysis of stereotyped voluntary movements in man. , 1975, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[13]  Remo Guidieri Res , 1995, RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics.

[14]  D M Corcos,et al.  Organizing principles for single-joint movements. I. A speed-insensitive strategy. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Fel'dman Ag,et al.  A model of central regulation of movement parameters , 1984 .

[16]  D E Sherwood,et al.  Rapid movements with reversals in direction. I. The control of movement time. , 1988, Experimental brain research.