Efficient Contracting in Cloud Service Markets with Asymmetric Information - A Screening Approach

Increasing popularity of cloud-based services has led to the emergence of cloud marketplaces where services from different providers are offered, usually in the form of a catalog. The customers' decision about buying offered services is based on idiosyncratic preferences regarding non-functional service attributes, e.g., price, provider reputation, and quality of service. The customers' preferences are not necessarily known to providers at the time the service (including pricing) is defined in the marketplace's service catalog. Thus, from a microeconomic perspective, we have to deal with information asymmetry on incomplete markets. On such markets, finding the optimal contracts (i.e., non-functional characteristics and prices) that maximize the provider's profit is challenging due to information uncertainty. This paper presents a generic economic framework based on contract theory which solves the above-mentioned optimization for cloud-based services offered at a marketplace. The contribution is threefold: (i) we analyze and select from providers' perspective non-functional attributes considered by customers when deciding which services to buy, (ii) we implement a holistic contracting framework that grants providers maximal profit through optimal combination of potential values of the chosen attributes and (iii) we present a study of a desktop service use case. The contracting framework addresses the phenomenon of adverse selection by leveraging the screening technique.

[1]  Gerard J. Tellis,et al.  Competitive Price and Quality Under Asymmetric Information , 1987 .

[2]  Suren Basov Hamiltonian Approach to Multi-Dimensional Screening , 2001 .

[3]  Christof Weinhardt,et al.  Towards an Efficient Decision Policy for Cloud Service Providers , 2010, ICIS.

[4]  R. Myerson Optimal coordination mechanisms in generalized principal–agent problems , 1982 .

[5]  J. Rochet,et al.  Ironing, Sweeping, and Multidimensional Screening , 1998 .

[6]  V. Hsu,et al.  Adverse Selection in Electronic Markets: Evidence from Online Stamp Auctions , 2004 .

[7]  Kimmo Berg,et al.  Multidimensional screening: online computation and limited information , 2008, ICEC.

[8]  Mike P. Papazoglou,et al.  Web Services - Principles and Technology , 2007 .

[9]  M. Armstrong,et al.  Price Discrimination ∗ , 1999 .

[10]  Danilo Ardagna,et al.  Adaptive Service Composition in Flexible Processes , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[11]  Arun Anandasivam,et al.  Cloud Services from a Consumer Perspective , 2010, AMCIS.

[12]  Erik E. Lehmann,et al.  Adverse Selection and Market Substitution by Electronic Trade , 2002 .

[13]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Moral Hazard and Observability , 1979 .

[14]  T. Mulgan The Contract Theory , 2006 .

[15]  C. Corbett,et al.  A Supplier's Optimal Quantity Discount Policy Under Asymmetric Information , 2000 .

[16]  M. Armstrong Multiproduct Nonlinear Pricing , 1996 .

[17]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  Efficiency through feedback-contingent fees and rewards in auction marketplaces with adverse selection and moral hazard , 2003, EC '03.

[18]  H. Varian Chapter 10 Price discrimination , 1989 .

[19]  Anne H. H. Ngu,et al.  QoS-aware middleware for Web services composition , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[20]  J. Rochet,et al.  The Economics of Multidimensional Screening , 2003 .

[21]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Building trust in the electronic market through an economic incentive mechanism , 1999, ICIS.

[22]  J. Stiglitz The market for 'lemons': quality uncertainty and the market mechanism , 2002 .