Comparison of the deskewed short-time correlator and the maximum likelihood correlator

Cross correlation of broad-band Doppler-scaled signals in noise is degraded by the Doppler-induced loss of signal coherence. The maximum likelihood correlator (MLC) compensates for Doppler scaling by time companding one of the two input waveforms, providing optimal differential time delay and relative time companding estimates. The price paid in using the MLC is significant implementation complexity. This paper compares a more efficient suboptimal technique, the deskewed short-time correlator (DSTC), with the MLC. Expressions for the output SNR of the MLC and DSTC are derived, as are expressions for DSTC accuracy of estimating differential time delay and relative time companding. Numerical evaluation of these expressions for low-pass white signal and noise shows that DSTC output SNR is only fractional dB below optimum, and estimation accuracy approaches the appropriate Cramer-Rao lower bounds. Comparison of implementation complexity indicates that the DSTC requires similar storage while reducing the number of computations by more than an order of magnitude. The deskewed short-time correlator is thus shown to provide implementational simplicity and near-optimal performance.

[1]  G. W. Johnson,et al.  Broadband correlation processing , 1983, ICASSP.

[2]  G. Clifford Carter,et al.  Estimation of time delay in the presence of source or receiver motion , 1977 .

[3]  J. Ianniello,et al.  Time delay estimation via cross-correlation in the presence of large estimation errors , 1982 .

[4]  E. Weinstein,et al.  Delay and Doppler estimation by time-space partition of the array data , 1983 .

[5]  S. Nardone,et al.  Estimation of location and motion parameters of a moving source observed from a linear array , 1981 .

[6]  Correlation of Signals Having a Linear Delay , 1963 .

[7]  Ehud Weinstein,et al.  Estimation of differential Doppler shifts , 1979 .

[8]  W. Adams,et al.  Correlator compensation requirements for passive time-delay estimation with moving source or receivers , 1980 .

[9]  G. Carter,et al.  The generalized correlation method for estimation of time delay , 1976 .

[10]  K. Scarbrough,et al.  Performance predictions for coherent and incoherent processing techniques of time delay estimation , 1983 .

[11]  Ehud Weinstein,et al.  Comparison of the Ziv-Zakai lower bound on time delay estimation with correlator performance , 1983, ICASSP.

[12]  Paul E. Green,et al.  The output signal-to-noise ratio of correlation detectors , 1957, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[13]  A. Quazi.  An overview on the time delay estimate in active and passive systems for target localization , 1981 .

[14]  G. Carter,et al.  On the simulation of a class of time delay estimation algorithms , 1981 .

[15]  Ehud Weinstein,et al.  Composite bound on the attainable mean square error in passive time-delay estimation from ambiguity prone signals , 1982, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.