A Fuzzy TOPSIS-Based Approach for Comprehensive Evaluation of Bio-Medical Waste Management: Advancing Sustainability and Decision-Making

Bio-medical waste management is critical for ensuring public health and environmental sustainability. However, due to the inherent ambiguities and complexities involved with waste characteristics and disposal techniques, measuring the efficiency of bio-medical waste management systems presents major hurdles. This study provides a Fuzzy TOPSIS-based (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) strategy for thorough bio-medical waste management assessment. The suggested method combines the benefits of fuzzy logic and TOPSIS, allowing for the incorporation of subjective judgments and ambiguity in the evaluation procedure. Initially, a thorough set of criteria is constructed based on a review of current literature and recommendations from experts, comprising Environmental Impact, Compliance with Regulations, Health and Safety, Technological Feasibility, and Cost-effectiveness. To accurately represent the inherent ambiguity and imprecision in decision-making, each criterion is evaluated using linguistic variables. Furthermore, the Fuzzy TOPSIS approach is used to rate various bio-medical waste management systems depending on how well they perform in comparison to the identified criteria. The language judgments are represented as fuzzy numbers, and the idea of closeness coefficients is used for calculating the relative distance between each alternative and the ideal answer. An investigation in a healthcare facility is performed to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the suggested strategy. To assess numerous waste management approaches, the study uses real-world data on waste management practices, expert opinions, and linguistic analyses. The study’s findings emphasize the benefits of using a Fuzzy TOPSIS-based technique to evaluate bio-medical waste management. According to the findings of this research study, recycling is the best choice because it has the potential to reduce waste, recover resources, and preserve the environment. It assists decision-makers to account for uncertainties and subjectivity, increases transparency and consistency in decision-making, and aids in choosing of the best waste management system. The proposed approach advances sustainable waste management practices in the bio-medical area and provides a helpful tool for policymakers and practitioners looking to enhance waste management systems.

[1]  M. R. Seikh,et al.  Interval-valued Fermatean fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and SWARA based PROMETHEE II method to bio-medical waste management , 2023, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  T. Adar,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of hazardous solid waste treatment and disposal technologies by a new integrated AHP&marcos approach , 2023, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making.

[3]  Rinku,et al.  An overview for biomedical waste management during pandemic like COVID-19 , 2022, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[4]  R. Khan,et al.  DURASec: Durable Security Blueprints for Web-Applications Empowering Digital India Initiative , 2022, EAI Endorsed Trans. Scalable Inf. Syst..

[5]  Aman Kumar,et al.  Solid waste management during COVID-19 pandemic: Recovery techniques and responses , 2021, Chemosphere.

[6]  R. Khan,et al.  Toward a Unified Model Approach for Evaluating Different Electric Vehicles , 2021, Energies.

[7]  Huaping Sun,et al.  Stakeholder coordination analysis in hazardous waste management: a case study in China , 2021, Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management.

[8]  Omar Bentahar,et al.  The impact of big data analytics and artificial intelligence on green supply chain process integration and hospital environmental performance , 2021 .

[9]  Raees Ahmad Khan,et al.  P-STORE: Extension of STORE Methodology to Elicit Privacy Requirements , 2021, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering.

[10]  S. Singh,et al.  Compromising situation of India’s bio-medical waste incineration units during pandemic outbreak of COVID-19: Associated environmental-health impacts and mitigation measures , 2021, Environmental Pollution.

[11]  Nathanael Ojong,et al.  Water, sanitation, hygiene and waste disposal practices as COVID-19 response strategy: insights from Bangladesh , 2021, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[12]  S. Ilyas,et al.  Disinfection technology and strategies for COVID-19 hospital and bio-medical waste management , 2020, Science of The Total Environment.

[13]  S. Hussain,et al.  Rethinking sustainability: a review of Liberia’s municipal solid waste management systems, status, and challenges , 2020, Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management.

[14]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  Minimising the present and future plastic waste, energy and environmental footprints related to COVID-19 , 2020, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[15]  Dhirendra Pandey,et al.  STORE: Security Threat Oriented Requirements Engineering Methodology , 2018, Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences.

[16]  A. Tsegaye,et al.  Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice about Biomedical Waste Management and Associated Factors among the Healthcare Professionals at Debre Markos Town Healthcare Facilities, Northwest Ethiopia , 2018, Journal of environmental and public health.

[17]  Min-chih Hsieh,et al.  Application of HFACS, fuzzy TOPSIS, and AHP for identifying important human error factors in emergency departments in Taiwan , 2018, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics.

[18]  Silpa Kaza,et al.  What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050 , 2018 .

[19]  Abteen Ijadi Maghsoodi,et al.  Identification and Evaluation of Construction Projects’ Critical Success Factors Employing Fuzzy-TOPSIS Approach , 2018 .

[20]  J. Chander,et al.  Biomedical waste management in India: Critical appraisal , 2018, Journal of laboratory physicians.

[21]  Abteen Ijadi Maghsoodi,et al.  Identification and Evaluation of Construction Projects’ Critical Success Factors Employing Fuzzy-TOPSIS Approach , 2017, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering.

[22]  Yong Geng,et al.  Hospital waste management in developing countries: A mini review , 2017, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[23]  Ankur Chauhan,et al.  Healthcare waste management: a state-of-the-art literature review , 2016 .

[24]  Christian Wagner,et al.  An exploration of issues and limitations in current methods of TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE).

[25]  Omar Boutkhoum,et al.  Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection , 2016, SpringerPlus.

[26]  N. Malys,et al.  Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability , 2016 .

[27]  Vikas Thakur,et al.  Healthcare waste management research: A structured analysis and review (2005–2014) , 2015, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[28]  M Vaccari,et al.  International governance structures for health-care waste management: a systematic review of scientific literature. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[29]  Takeshi Fujiwara,et al.  Examining the effectiveness of municipal solid waste management systems: an integrated cost-benefit analysis perspective with a financial cost modeling in Taiwan. , 2011, Waste management.

[30]  R. K. Singh,et al.  A fuzzy TOPSIS based approach for e-sourcing , 2011, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[31]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[32]  Carlos Francisco Simões Gomes,et al.  Multicriteria decision making applied to waste recycling in Brazil , 2008 .

[33]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Using a multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate mobile phone alternatives , 2007, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[34]  R. Gregory,et al.  Deconstructing adaptive management: criteria for applications to environmental management. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[35]  Hsu-Shih Shih,et al.  A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection , 2006, Math. Comput. Model..

[36]  Virendra Misra,et al.  Hazardous waste, impact on health and environment for development of better waste management strategies in future in India. , 2005, Environment international.

[37]  T. Chu,et al.  A Fuzzy TOPSIS Method for Robot Selection , 2003 .

[38]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[39]  Pekka Salminen,et al.  Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis , 1997 .

[40]  Dhirendra Pandey,et al.  Risks, Security, and Privacy for HIV/AIDS Data: Big Data Perspective , 2018 .

[41]  S. Shalini,et al.  EVALUATION OF BIO-MEDICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN A GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL , 2012 .

[42]  Ming-Chyuan Lin,et al.  Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process , 2008, Comput. Ind..