Thematic relatedness production norms for 100 object concepts

Knowledge of thematic relations is an area of increased interest in semantic memory research because it is crucial to many cognitive processes. One methodological issue that researchers face is how to identify pairs of thematically related concepts that are well-established in semantic memory for most people. In this article, we review existing methods of assessing thematic relatedness and provide thematic relatedness production norming data for 100 object concepts. In addition, 1,174 related concept pairs obtained from the production norms were classified as reflecting one of the five subtypes of relations: attributive, argument, coordinate, locative, and temporal. The database and methodology will be useful for researchers interested in the effects of thematic knowledge on language processing, analogical reasoning, similarity judgments, and memory. These data will also benefit researchers interested in investigating potential processing differences among the five types of semantic relations.

[1]  Daniel Mirman,et al.  Human Neuroscience Original Research Article a Combination of Thematic and Similarity-based Semantic Processes Confers Resistance to Deficit following Left Hemisphere Stroke , 2022 .

[2]  K. McRae,et al.  Semantic and associative relations in adolescents and young adults: Examining a tenuous dichotomy. , 2012 .

[3]  Pierre Mounoud,et al.  Contribution of the priming paradigm to the understanding of the conceptual developmental shift from 5 to 9 years of age. , 2009, Developmental science.

[4]  Grant M. Walker,et al.  Neuroanatomical dissociation for taxonomic and thematic knowledge in the human brain , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Semantic relations differentially impact associative recognition memory: Electrophysiological evidence , 2013, Brain and Cognition.

[6]  A. Anastasi.  Individual differences. , 2020, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  D. Mirman,et al.  Individual differences in the strength of taxonomic versus thematic relations. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  Anna M. Borghi,et al.  Situation bounded conceptual organization in children: from action to spatial relations , 2003 .

[9]  Mary Hare,et al.  Activating event knowledge , 2009, Cognition.

[10]  L. L. Jones,et al.  Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[11]  Fabian Altenbach,et al.  Deeper insights into semantic relations: An fMRI study of part-whole and functional associations , 2014, Brain and Language.

[12]  Jules Davidoff,et al.  Preserved thematic and impaired taxonomic categorisation: A case study , 2004 .

[13]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[14]  R. Steinberg.  A basis for , 2016 .

[15]  Katie L McMahon,et al.  Differential processing of thematic and categorical conceptual relations in spoken word production. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  Markus J. Hofmann,et al.  Remembering Words in Context as Predicted by an Associative Read-Out Model , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[17]  Solène Kalénine,et al.  Preschoolers' Superordinate Taxonomic Categorization as a Function of Individual Processing of Visual vs. Contextual/functional Information and Object Domain , 2007 .

[18]  Christine E. Watson,et al.  The role of action representations in thematic object relations , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[19]  J. Elman,et al.  A basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[20]  M Moscovitch,et al.  Episodic memory for object location versus episodic memory for object identity: Do they rely on distinct encoding processes? , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Ellen M. Markman,et al.  Categorization and Naming in Children: Problems of Induction , 1989 .

[22]  Z. Estes,et al.  Integrative priming occurs rapidly and uncontrollably during lexical processing. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[24]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[25]  T. Ferrée,et al.  EEG theta and alpha responses reveal qualitative differences in processing taxonomic versus thematic semantic relationships , 2010, Brain and Language.

[26]  Nicola S. Clayton,et al.  Episodic Memory , 2019, Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior.

[27]  R. Nisbett,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Attending Holistically Versus Analytically: Comparing the Context Sensitivity of Japanese and Americans , 2004 .

[28]  Z. Estes,et al.  Thematic thinking : the apprehension and consequences of thematic relations , 2011 .

[29]  Monica Baciu,et al.  The sensory-motor specificity of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations: A behavioral and fMRI study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[30]  M. Goodale,et al.  Two visual systems re-viewed , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  Tilo Kircher,et al.  Categorical and thematic knowledge representation in the brain: Neural correlates of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Zachary Estes,et al.  Thematic relations affect similarity via commonalities. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  Olga Sachs,et al.  Is the Motor or the Garage More Important to the Car? The Difference Between Semantic Associations in Single Word and Sentence Production , 2012, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.

[34]  Angel Fernandez,et al.  Free-association norms for the Spanish names of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[35]  Tilo Kircher,et al.  Priming words with pictures: Neural correlates of semantic associations in a cross‐modal priming task using fMRI , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[36]  J. Hampton.  Concepts as Prototypes , 2006 .

[37]  G. Murphy,et al.  Thematic relations in adults' concepts. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.