Word category conversion causes processing costs: Evidence from adjectival passives

Constructing syntactic representations in language comprehension begins with the identification of word categories. Whether the category information is stored in the mental lexicon is a matter of debate in current linguistic theorizing. The standard view assumes that the syntactic category of a word is lexically specified (lexicalist approach). More recently, it has been proposed within the paradigm of distributed morphology that lexical elements (roots) are stored without any syntactic category information: The syntactic category of a lexical element is determined only by the syntactic context in which it appears (syntactic approach). For processing categoryambiguous words, different hypotheses can be derived from these two accounts. The lexicalist approach predicts that there are productive grammatical processes, such as nominalization and adjectivization, that convert a word of Category A into one of Category B. Such a conversion might be assumed to create additional processing costs. Within the syntactic approach, on the other hand, no additional processing step is expected, because there is no need for any category shift. In a self-paced reading study on so-called adjectival passives, we found evidence of costs predicted under the lexicalist approach (i.e., for a grammatical process that changes the category of a word). More specifically, the present study provides evidence for category conversion from a verbal participle into an adjectival one. We also discuss an alternative explanation for this finding in terms of frequency.

[1]  David Embick,et al.  On the Structure of Resultative Participles in English , 2004, Linguistic Inquiry.

[2]  E. Leiss Die Verbalkategorien des Deutschen: Ein Beitrag zur Theorie der sprachlichen Kategorisierung , 1992 .

[3]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The On-Line Effects of Semantic Context on Syntactic Processing , 1977 .

[4]  Alec Marantz,et al.  No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon , 1997 .

[5]  Andrew Spencer,et al.  Morphological Theory: An Introduction to Word Structure in Generative Grammar , 1991 .

[6]  Irene Rapp,et al.  Zustand? Passiv? — Überlegungen zum sogenannten „Zustandspassiv“ , 1996 .

[7]  Edward Gibson,et al.  The Interaction of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Statistics in the Resolution of Syntactic Category Ambiguity. , 2006 .

[8]  木村 和夫 Pragmatics , 1997, Language Teaching.

[9]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[10]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  A time course analysis of enriched composition , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Implicature, Relevance and Default Pragmatic Inference , 2004 .

[12]  Martin Everaert,et al.  The Blackwell Companion to Syntax , 2006 .

[13]  Elena Anagnostopoulou,et al.  Structuring Participles , 2008 .

[14]  Brian McElree,et al.  Complement Coercion Is Not Modulated by Competition: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2022 .

[15]  Torgrim Solstad,et al.  Building Event-Based Ad Hoc Properties: On the Interpretation of Adjectival Passives , 2009 .

[16]  Manfred Bierwisch,et al.  Lexical Information from a Minimalist Point of View , 2008 .

[17]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Parsing in a Dynamical System: An Attractor-based Account of the Interaction of Lexical and Structural Constraints in Sentence Processing , 1997 .

[18]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[19]  Claudia Maienborn,et al.  Das Zustandspassiv. Grammatische Einordnung – Bildungsbeschränkung – Interpretationsspielraum , 2007 .

[20]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records , 1995 .

[21]  Brian McElree,et al.  Reading time evidence for enriched composition , 2001, Cognition.

[22]  M K Tanenhaus,et al.  A constraint-based lexicalist account of the subject/object attachment preference , 1994, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[23]  Paul Portner,et al.  Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning , 2011 .