Optimising co-design with ethnic minority consumers

[1]  Éidín Ní Shé,et al.  Mitigating unintended consequences of co‐design in health care , 2021, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[2]  E. Manias,et al.  How do health services engage culturally and linguistically diverse consumers? An analysis of consumer engagement frameworks in Australia , 2021, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[3]  S. Park,et al.  Broadening diversity through creative involvement to identify research priorities , 2020, Research Involvement and Engagement.

[4]  E. Bruce,et al.  Are you really doing ‘codesign’? Critical reflections when working with vulnerable populations , 2020, BMJ Open.

[5]  T. Kroll,et al.  Minding the gap: identifying values to enable public and patient involvement at the pre-commencement stage of research projects , 2020, Research Involvement and Engagement.

[6]  V. Palmer,et al.  A scoping review of the use of co-design methods with culturally and linguistically diverse communities to improve or adapt mental health services. , 2020, Health & social care in the community.

[7]  E. Manias,et al.  The safety of health care for ethnic minority patients: a systematic review , 2020, International Journal for Equity in Health.

[8]  Alexander K. Saeri,et al.  Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews , 2020, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[9]  M. Phoenix,et al.  Strategies used to engage hard-to-reach populations in childhood disability research: a scoping review , 2020, Disability and rehabilitation.

[10]  E. Manias,et al.  Beyond translation: Engaging with culturally and linguistically diverse consumers , 2019, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[11]  T. Kroll,et al.  Clarifying the mechanisms and resources that enable the reciprocal involvement of seldom heard groups in health and social care research: A collaborative rapid realist review process , 2019, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[12]  S. Vertovec.  Talking around super-diversity , 2019 .

[13]  Michael Larkin,et al.  Codesigning health and other public services with vulnerable and disadvantaged populations: Insights from an international collaboration , 2019, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[14]  Clayon B Hamilton,et al.  What constitutes meaningful engagement for patients and families as partners on research teams? , 2018, Journal of health services research & policy.

[15]  S. Ziebland,et al.  What are the mechanisms that enable the reciprocal involvement of seldom heard groups in health and social care research? A rapid realist review protocol , 2018 .

[16]  Per Kristensson,et al.  Team diversity and its management in a co-design team , 2018 .

[17]  Publisher's Note , 2018, Anaesthesia.

[18]  Jakob Trischler,et al.  Co-designing services with vulnerable consumers , 2017 .

[19]  J. Gunn,et al.  Advancing engagement methods for trials: the CORE study relational model of engagement for a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial of experience-based co-design for people living with severe mental illnesses , 2017, Trials.

[20]  A. Pirinen.  The Barriers and Enablers of Co-design for Services , 2016 .

[21]  S. Green,et al.  Co-production as an approach to developing stakeholder partnerships to reduce mental health inequalities: an evaluation of a pilot service , 2016, Primary Health Care Research & Development.

[22]  Ashleigh Miatello,et al.  Applying experience-based co-design with vulnerable populations: Lessons from a systematic review of methods to involve patients, families and service providers in child and youth mental health service improvement , 2016 .

[23]  Shannon L. Golden,et al.  Lessons Learned From a Community-Based Participatory Research Mental Health Promotion Program for American Indian Youth , 2016, Health promotion practice.

[24]  Josephine Ocloo,et al.  From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement , 2016, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[25]  S. Osborne,et al.  Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment? , 2016 .

[26]  Glenn Robert,et al.  Experience-based Co-design and Healthcare Improvement: Realizing Participatory Design in the Public Sector , 2014 .

[27]  Andy Dearden,et al.  How was it for you? Experiences of participatory design in the UK health service , 2013 .

[28]  Laurie A. Moore,et al.  Walking On: Celebrating the Journeys of Native American Adolescents with Substance Use Problems on the Winding Road to Healing , 2012, Journal of psychoactive drugs.

[29]  B. Happell,et al.  The myth of representation: The case for consumer leadership , 2006 .

[30]  D. Swinglehurst,et al.  Narrative methods in quality improvement research , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.