Eye-Tracking Data: New Insights on Response Order Effects and Other Cognitive Shortcuts in Survey Responding.

Survey researchers since Cannell have worried that respondents may take various shortcuts to reduce the effort needed to complete a survey. The evidence for such shortcuts is often indirect. For instance, preferences for earlier versus later response options have been interpreted as evidence that respondents do not read beyond the first few options. This is really only a hypothesis, however, that is not supported by direct evidence regarding the allocation of respondent attention. In the current study, we used a new method to more directly observe what respondents do and do not look at by recording their eye movements while they answered questions in a Web survey. The eye-tracking data indicate that respondents do in fact spend more time looking at the first few options in a list of response options than those at the end of the list; this helps explain their tendency to select the options presented first regardless of their content. In addition, the eye-tracking data reveal that respondents are reluctant to invest effort in reading definitions of survey concepts that are only a mouse click away or paying attention to initially hidden response options. It is clear from the eye-tracking data that some respondents are more prone to these and other cognitive shortcuts than others, providing relatively direct evidence for what had been suspected based on more conventional measures.

[1]  R. Pieters,et al.  Visual Attention to Repeated Print Advertising: A Test of Scanpath Theory , 1999 .

[2]  Jeff K. Caird,et al.  Visual Search for Traffic Signs: The Effects of Clutter, Luminance, and Aging , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[3]  Wai-Tat Fu,et al.  Soft constraints in interactive behavior: the case of ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[5]  Frederick G. Conrad,et al.  Misunderstanding Standardized Language in Research Interviews , 2004 .

[6]  J. Krosnick,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF A COGNITIVE THEORY OF RESPONSE-ORDER EFFECTS IN SURVEY MEASUREMENT , 1987 .

[7]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  What They See Is What We Get , 2004 .

[8]  F. Conrad,et al.  Everyday concepts and classification errors: judgments of disability and residence , 2006 .

[9]  M. Couper,et al.  Picture This!Exploring Visual Effects in Web Surveys , 2004 .

[10]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Questions and answers in attitude surveys , 1982 .

[11]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Eye-tracking and Individual Differences in off-Normal Event Detection when Flying with a Synthetic Vision System Display , 2004 .

[12]  J. Krosnick Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys , 1991 .

[13]  R. Pieters,et al.  Why Do Consumers Stop Viewing Television Commercials? Two Experiments on the Influence of Moment-to-Moment Entertainment and Information Value , 2003 .

[14]  Cleo D. Redline,et al.  Eye-Movement Analysis: A New Tool for Evaluating the Design of Visually Administered Instruments (Paper and Web) By , 2001 .

[15]  Ronald G. Stansfield,et al.  Sociological Methodology 1982 , 1983 .

[16]  F. Conrad,et al.  Clarifying question meaning in a household telephone survey. , 2000, Public opinion quarterly.

[17]  J. Krosnick,et al.  The Impact of Candidate Name Order on Election Outcomes , 1998 .

[18]  David E. Kieras Using the Keystroke-Level Model to Estimate Execution Times , 2003 .

[19]  Judith A. Perrolle,et al.  Intellectual Assembly Lines: The Rationalization of Managerial, Professional, and Technical Work , 1984 .

[20]  Peter V. Miller,et al.  Research on Interviewing Techniques , 1981 .

[21]  M. Schober,et al.  Does conversational interviewing reduce survey measurement error?. Public opinion quarterly, . , 1997 .

[22]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Global and local covert visual attention: Evidence from a bayesian hidden markov model , 2003 .

[23]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Eye Fixations on Advertisements and Memory for Brands: A Model and Findings , 2000 .

[24]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? , 2001, Vision Research.

[25]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[27]  M. Land,et al.  The Roles of Vision and Eye Movements in the Control of Activities of Daily Living , 1998, Perception.

[28]  Frederick G. Conrad,et al.  Does Conversational Interviewing Reduce Survey Measurement Error , 1997 .

[29]  F. Conrad,et al.  Use and non-use of clarification features in web surveys , 2006 .

[30]  Keith Rayner Eye Movements in Reading , 2001 .

[31]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Question Understanding Aid (QUAID) A Web Facility that Tests Question Comprehensibility , 2006 .

[32]  Andrew J. Stewart,et al.  Integrating text and pictorial information: eye movements when looking at print advertisements. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.