Policy implications of uncertainty in modeled life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of biofuels.

Biofuels have received legislative support recently in California's Low-Carbon Fuel Standard and the Federal Energy Independence and Security Act. Both present new fuel types, but neither provides methodological guidelines for dealing with the inherent uncertainty in evaluating their potential life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions. Emissions reductions are based on point estimates only. This work demonstrates the use of Monte Carlo simulation to estimate life-cycle emissions distributions from ethanol and butanol from corn or switchgrass. Life-cycle emissions distributions for each feedstock and fuel pairing modeled span an order of magnitude or more. Using a streamlined life-cycle assessment, corn ethanol emissions range from 50 to 250 g CO(2)e/MJ, for example, and each feedstock-fuel pathway studied shows some probability of greater emissions than a distribution for gasoline. Potential GHG emissions reductions from displacing fossil fuels with biofuels are difficult to forecast given this high degree of uncertainty in life-cycle emissions. This uncertainty is driven by the importance and uncertainty of indirect land use change emissions. Incorporating uncertainty in the decision making process can illuminate the risks of policy failure (e.g., increased emissions), and a calculated risk of failure due to uncertainty can be used to inform more appropriate reduction targets in future biofuel policies.

[1]  Michael Q. Wang,et al.  Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts of different corn ethanol plant types , 2007 .

[2]  T. Ezeji,et al.  Bioproduction of butanol from biomass: from genes to bioreactors. , 2007, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[3]  Andrew D. Jones,et al.  Effects of US Maize Ethanol on Global Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Estimating Market-Mediated Responses , 2010 .

[4]  Seungdo Kim,et al.  Life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol derived from corn grain via dry milling. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[5]  Nasib Qureshi,et al.  Butanol production from wheat straw hydrolysate using Clostridium beijerinckii , 2007, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[6]  Heather L MacLean,et al.  Life cycle evaluation of emerging lignocellulosic ethanol conversion technologies. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[7]  A. Faaij,et al.  Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle- and long-term , 2005 .

[8]  Daniel Sperling,et al.  A Low-Carbon Fuel Standard for California, Part 1: Technical Analysis , 2007 .

[9]  L. Nielsen,et al.  Fermentative butanol production by clostridia , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[10]  L. A. Kszos,et al.  Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States. , 2005 .

[11]  Keith A. Smith,et al.  N 2 O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels , 2007 .

[12]  Swapnil Chhabra,et al.  Biofuel alternatives to ethanol: pumping the microbial well. , 2008, Trends in biotechnology.

[13]  Thomas S. Colvin,et al.  Model-Based Technique to Determine Variable-Rate Nitrogen for Corn , 1999 .

[14]  R. Perrin,et al.  Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Michael O'Hare,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels' indirect land use change are uncertain but may be much greater than previously estimated. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  Michael Wang,et al.  Assessment of potential life‐cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission effects from using corn‐based butanol as a transportation fuel , 2008, Biotechnology progress.

[17]  R. Plevin Modeling Corn Ethanol and Climate , 2009 .

[18]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  Biomass Production in Switchgrass across the United States: Database Description and Determinants of Yield , 2010 .

[19]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from petroleum-based fuels and impacts on low carbon fuel policies. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  J. Liao,et al.  Non-fermentative pathways for synthesis of branched-chain higher alcohols as biofuels , 2008, Nature.

[21]  B. Dale,et al.  Biofuels, land use change, and greenhouse gas emissions: some unexplored variables. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Andrew D. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material for: Ethanol Can Contribute To Energy and Environmental Goals , 2006 .

[23]  H. Shapouri,et al.  Usda's 2002 Ethanol Cost-Of-Production Survey , 2005 .

[24]  J. Kwiatkowski,et al.  Modeling the process and costs of fuel ethanol production by the corn dry-grind process , 2006 .

[25]  David D. Hsu,et al.  Life cycle environmental impacts of selected U.S. ethanol production and use pathways in 2022. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[27]  James C Liao,et al.  Microbial production of advanced transportation fuels in non-natural hosts. , 2009, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[28]  N. Qureshi,et al.  Butanol production from wheat straw by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation using Clostridium beijerinckii: Part II—Fed-batch fermentation , 2008 .