A cross-sectional analysis of reported corporate environmental sustainability practices.

The concept of sustainability evolved throughout the 1970s and 1980s, but was formally described by the 27 principles of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development in 1992. Despite the passage of nearly 20years, to date there are no uniform set of federal rules, regulations, or guidelines specifically governing the environmental aspects of sustainability practices or related requirements in the United States. In this benchmark analysis, we have collected information on the sustainability programs of the five largest US companies in each of the 26 industrial sectors [based on the Forbes Global 2000 through 2009 (n=130)]. For each company, we reviewed the most recent corporate sustainability, citizenship, or responsibility report, limiting our scope to environmental components, if available. Ten criteria were identified and analyzed, including leadership, reporting, external review, certification, and individual components of environmental sustainability programs. With respect to the prevalence of sustainability components between various business sectors, we found that the Drugs and Biotechnology (87%), Household and Personal Products (87%) and Oil and Gas Operations (87%) industries had the most comprehensive environmental sustainability programs. Using the nine components of environmental sustainability as a benchmark, we identified four key components as the characteristics of the most comprehensive environmental sustainability programs. These were (1) empowering leadership with a commitment to sustainability (80%), (2) standardized reporting (87%), (3) third-party evaluation of the sustainability programs (73%), and (4) obtaining ISO 14001 certification (73%). We found that many firms shaped their own definition of sustainability and developed their associated sustainability programs based on their sector, stakeholder interests, products or services, and business model. We noted an emerging area that we have called product sustainability - one in which toxicologists and environmental scientists can play a vital role helping to ensure that a manufactured item will indeed be considered acceptable for distribution now, as well as in the coming years. Numerous examples or case studies are presented.

[1]  J. Elkington.  Cannibals with Forks , 1997 .

[2]  Sendhil Mullainathan,et al.  Cómo detectar las burbujas oportunamente , 2010 .

[3]  Daniel C. Esty,et al.  Green to gold : how smart companies use environmental strategy to innovate, create value, and build competitive advantage , 2006 .

[4]  Kel Dummett,et al.  Drivers for Corporate Environmental Responsibility (CER) , 2006 .

[5]  W. Lukiw,et al.  Mercury from chlor-alkali plants: measured concentrations in food product sugar , 2009, Environmental health : a global access science source.

[6]  Charles J. Kibert,et al.  Sustainable Construction : Green Building Design and Delivery , 2005 .

[7]  Julie M Panko,et al.  Physical and chemical characterization of tire-related particles: comparison of particles generated using different methodologies. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[8]  V. Hontou,et al.  A multicriterion classification approach for assessing the impact of environmental policies on the competitiveness of firms , 2007 .

[9]  S. Al-Athel,et al.  Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: "Our Common Future" , 1987 .

[10]  Anne T Lawrence,et al.  Leading-Edge Environmental Management: Motivation, Opportunity, Resources, and Processes , 1995 .

[11]  D. Paustenbach,et al.  The European Union’s REACH regulation: a review of its history and requirements , 2009, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[12]  Fred Granek,et al.  The Toronto Region Sustainability Program: insights on the adoption of pollution prevention practices by small to medium-sized manufacturers in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) , 2006 .

[13]  David T. Allen,et al.  Green engineering: Environmentally conscious design of chemical processes and products , 2001 .

[14]  S. Waddock,et al.  The Dynamics of Change in Corporate Community Relations , 1995 .

[15]  P. Glavič,et al.  Indicators of sustainable production , 2003 .

[16]  G. H. Brundtland.  World Commission on environment and development , 1985 .

[17]  P. Aarne Vesilind,et al.  Ethical motivations for green business and engineering , 2010 .

[18]  Frankie Wood-Black,et al.  Overcoming nontechnical barriers to the implementation of sustainable solutions in industry. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  SETAC-Europe: Second working group on LCIA (WIA-2): Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment: Background document for the second working group on life cycle impact assessment of SETAC-Europe (WIA-2) , 1999 .

[20]  M. Epstein,et al.  Sustainability in Action: Identifying and Measuring the Key Performance Drivers , 2001 .

[21]  H. Jenkins,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and the mining industry: conflicts and constructs , 2004 .

[22]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  Adventures of a Bystander , 1979 .

[23]  D. Wheeler,et al.  Focusing on Value: Reconciling Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability and a Stakeholder Approach in a Network World , 2003 .

[24]  Julian D Marshall,et al.  Framing the elusive concept of sustainability: a sustainability hierarchy. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  M. Epstein,et al.  Improving Sustainability Performance: Specifying, Implementing and Measuring Key Principles , 2003 .

[26]  J. Elkington.  Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development , 1994 .

[27]  Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment , 1999 .

[28]  D. Wallinga,et al.  Not So Sweet: Missing Mercury and High Fructose Corn Syrup , 2009 .

[29]  R. B. Doorneweert,et al.  Global Reporting Initiative , 2010 .

[30]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  SYSTEMS APPROACH TO CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY A General Management Framework , 2003 .