Response to a monovalent 2009 influenza A (H1N1) vaccine.

BACKGROUND A novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus is responsible for the first influenza pandemic in 41 years. A safe and effective vaccine is needed. A randomized, observer-blind, parallel-group trial evaluating two doses of an inactivated, split-virus 2009 H1N1 vaccine in healthy adults between the ages of 18 and 64 years is ongoing at a single site in Australia. METHODS We evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of the vaccine after each of two scheduled doses, administered 21 days apart. A total of 240 subjects, equally divided into two age groups (<50 years and >or=50 years), were enrolled and underwent randomization to receive either 15 microg or 30 microg of hemagglutinin antigen by intramuscular injection. We measured antibody titers using hemagglutination-inhibition and microneutralization assays at baseline and 21 days after vaccination. The coprimary immunogenicity end points were the proportion of subjects with antibody titers of 1:40 or more on hemagglutination-inhibition assay, the proportion of subjects with either seroconversion or a significant increase in antibody titer, and the factor increase in the geometric mean titer. RESULTS By day 21 after the first dose, antibody titers of 1:40 or more were observed in 114 of 120 subjects (95.0%) who received the 15-microg dose and in 106 of 119 subjects (89.1%) who received the 30-microg dose. A similar result was observed after the second dose of vaccine. No deaths, serious adverse events, or adverse events of special interest were reported. Local discomfort (e.g., injection-site tenderness or pain) was reported by 56.3% of subjects, and systemic symptoms (e.g., headache) by 53.8% of subjects after each dose. Nearly all events were mild to moderate in intensity. CONCLUSIONS A single 15-microg dose of 2009 H1N1 vaccine was immunogenic in adults, with mild-to-moderate vaccine-associated reactions. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00938639).

[1]  Shanta M Zimmer,et al.  Historical perspective--Emergence of influenza A (H1N1) viruses. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  S. Rastogi,et al.  Summary of clinical trials of influenza virus vaccines in adults. , 1977, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[3]  Keiji Fukuda,et al.  Detection of Antibody to Avian Influenza A (H5N1) Virus in Human Serum by Using a Combination of Serologic Assays , 1999, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[4]  Ron A M Fouchier,et al.  Antigenic and Genetic Characteristics of Swine-Origin 2009 A(H1N1) Influenza Viruses Circulating in Humans , 2009, Science.

[5]  Libo Dong,et al.  Cross-reactive antibody responses to the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  T. Inglesby,et al.  Public health and medical responses to the 1957-58 influenza pandemic. , 2009, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[7]  C. Bridges,et al.  Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of 1 versus 2 doses of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in vaccine-naive 5-8-year-old children. , 2006, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[8]  B. Obama,et al.  Reflections on the 1976 Swine Flu Vaccination Program , 2006, Emerging infectious diseases.

[9]  N. Cox,et al.  Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2009. , 2009 .

[10]  T. Cate,et al.  Immunogenicity, safety and consistency of new trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine. , 2008, Vaccine.

[11]  A. Monto,et al.  Immunization With Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Partially Immunized Toddlers , 2006, Pediatrics.

[12]  Mark Wolff,et al.  Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated subvirion influenza A (H5N1) vaccine. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.