Literacy and body fatness are associated with underreporting of energy intake in US low-income women using the multiple-pass 24-hour recall: a doubly labeled water study.

OBJECTIVE The accuracy of the multiple-pass 24-hour recall method for estimating energy intake in low-income women in the United States was ascertained by comparing the method with measurements of total energy expenditure. The multiple-pass 24-hour recall is designed to provide respondents with multiple cues and opportunities to report their food intake. It consists of 3 distinct passes: the quick list, detailed description, and review. Predictors of energy intake misreporting (energy intake--total energy expenditure) in the sample were determined. DESIGN Four multiple-pass 24-hour recalls (2 in person, 2 by telephone) were obtained over a 14-day period to estimate energy intake. Total energy expenditure was measured over the same 14-day period using the doubly labeled water method. Body composition was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, and literacy was measured by the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) for reading and spelling. SUBJECTS/SETTINGS Thirty-five low-income women between the ages of 19 and 46 years were tested at the General Clinical Research Center at the University of Vermont, Burlington. Low income was defined as a household income at or below 130% of the federal poverty level. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Pearson product moment correlation coefficients, t tests, paired t tests, and stepwise multiple regression analysis were used to test the relationships among study variables. RESULTS Mean energy intake was significantly lower than mean total energy expenditure (2,197 +/- 607 vs 2,644 +/- 503 kcal, P = .001) and the correlation between the 2 measures was poor (r = .22, P = .20). Percentage body fat and the combined age-adjusted reading and spelling WRAT scores were the best predictors of misreporting of energy intake (R = .52, P = .006). CONCLUSIONS The multiple-pass 24-hour recall did not generate a group measure of energy intake that was accurate or unbiased in this sample. Underreporting was strongly associated with increased body fatness. The ability to read and spell as measured by the WRAT improved the accuracy of the women's recall of their food intake. APPLICATIONS Dietetics professionals should take into consideration the problem of underreporting whenever conclusions are made about associations between diet and health and/or when evaluating the impact of food assistance programs on dietary intake.

[1]  S. Heymsfield,et al.  Discrepancy between self-reported and actual caloric intake and exercise in obese subjects. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  W Mertz,et al.  Number of days of food intake records required to estimate individual and group nutrient intakes with defined confidence. , 1987, The Journal of nutrition.

[3]  D A Schoeller,et al.  How accurate is self-reported dietary energy intake? , 2009, Nutrition reviews.

[4]  S A Jebb,et al.  Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 2. Evaluating the results of published surveys. , 1991, European journal of clinical nutrition.

[5]  A M Prentice,et al.  Human energy expenditure in affluent societies: an analysis of 574 doubly-labelled water measurements. , 1996, European journal of clinical nutrition.

[6]  W. Coward,et al.  Validation of dietary intakes of protein and energy against 24 hour urinary N and DLW energy expenditure in middle-aged women, retired men and post-obese subjects: comparisons with validation against presumed energy requirements , 1997, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[7]  T J Cole,et al.  Characteristics of the low-energy reporters in a longitudinal national dietary survey , 1997, British Journal of Nutrition.

[8]  K. Westerterp,et al.  Estimation of energy intake to feed subjects at energy balance as verified with doubly labelled water: a study in the elderly. , 1993, European journal of clinical nutrition.

[9]  D A Schoeller,et al.  Measurement of energy expenditure in humans by doubly labeled water method. , 1982, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[10]  S A Jebb,et al.  Measurements of total energy expenditure provide insights into the validity of dietary measurements of energy intake. , 1993, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[11]  J. Dirkx,et al.  Developing written nutrition information for adults with low literacy skills , 1993 .

[12]  R G Whitehead,et al.  Validation of estimates of energy intake by weighed dietary record and diet history in children and adolescents. , 1992, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[13]  A. Black Physical activity levels from a meta-analysis of doubly labeled water studies for validating energy intake as measured by dietary assessment. , 2009, Nutrition reviews.

[14]  P. Guenther,et al.  The multiple-pass approach for the 24-hour recall in the continuing survey of food intakes by individuals 1994-96 , 1996 .

[15]  Rachel K. Johnson,et al.  Comparison of multiple-pass 24-hour recall estimates of energy intake with total energy expenditure determined by the doubly labeled water method in young children. , 1996, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[16]  M Vrijheid,et al.  Who are the 'low energy reporters' in the dietary and nutritional survey of British adults? , 1997, International journal of epidemiology.

[17]  D A Schoeller,et al.  Validity of reported energy intake in obese and nonobese adolescents. , 1990, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[18]  R B Mazess,et al.  Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for total-body and regional bone-mineral and soft-tissue composition. , 1990, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[19]  W Mertz,et al.  Food intake measurements: is there a "gold standard"? , 1992, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[20]  S. Männistö,et al.  Increasing prevalence of underreporting does not necessarily distort dietary surveys , 1997, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[21]  P. Corey,et al.  Sources of variance in 24-hour dietary recall data: implications for nutrition study design and interpretation. , 1979, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[22]  A. Prentice,et al.  High levels of energy expenditure in obese women. , 1986, British medical journal.

[23]  C. Ritenbaugh,et al.  The association of energy intake bias with psychological scores of women , 1999, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[24]  R. Ballard-Barbash,et al.  Food intakes of US children and adolescents compared with recommendations. , 1997, Pediatrics.

[25]  A. Prentice,et al.  Use of food quotients to predict respiratory quotients for the doubly-labelled water method of measuring energy expenditure. , 1986, Human nutrition. Clinical nutrition.

[26]  M. Wiseman,et al.  The dietary and nutritional survey of British adults. , 1990 .

[27]  M. Livingstone Assessment of food intakes: are we measuring what people eat? , 1995, British journal of biomedical science.

[28]  M. Goran,et al.  Correlates of over- and underreporting of energy intake in healthy older men and women. , 1994, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[29]  S A Jebb,et al.  Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. , 1991, European journal of clinical nutrition.

[30]  J. Speakman,et al.  Revised equations for calculating CO2 production from doubly labeled water in humans. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[31]  M. McDowell,et al.  Dietary methods research in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: underreporting of energy intake. , 1997, The American journal of clinical nutrition.