What is the ultimate fate of presented abstracts? The conversion rates of presentations to publications over a five-year period from three North American plastic surgery meetings

Background Advancements in clinical decision-making are influenced by presentations made at scientific conferences or publications in journals with extensive readership. However, many ideas shared at annual conferences fail to be published, and most surgeons attend these meetings only sporadically. Objective To quantify the conversion rates of meeting presentations to publications in North American plastic surgery. Methods MEDLINE (OvidSP) and PubMed databases were cross-referenced with abstracts accepted for podium presentation at the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and American Association of Plastic Surgeons annual meetings from 2003 to 2007. Parameters reviewed included publication rate, time to publication, subspecialty, trial type, publication journal and journal impact factor. Results Over the five-year study period, 45.00% of the 888 presentations were published in peer-reviewed journals. The mean time to publication was 22 months (range 1.00 to 85.90 months). In total, 57.00% of the 400 publications appeared in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; 47.20% of publications were case series study design. The majority of publications were of the reconstruction subspecialty (31.00%). Abstracts from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons had the highest conversion rate (57.70%). Publications based on abstracts presented at the American Association of Plastic Surgeons had the highest mean journal impact factor (2.33). The Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons had the highest total number of publications (n=161). Conclusions From the three North American annual general meetings reviewed, there was a modest conversion rate of mainly reconstructive case series published predominantly in a single journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Several years often pass from the genesis of a research hypothesis to final publication, and because the majority of presentations fail to be published, presentations should be observed with a critical eye given the more stringent peer review process and time required for final publication. In an effort to improve conversion rates, departments and faculty members must foster a culture that prioritizes publication.

[1]  D. Ricketts,et al.  From presentation to publication: the natural history of orthopaedic abstracts in the United Kingdom , 2006, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[2]  Paul McArthur,et al.  Are we still publishing our presented abstracts from the British Association of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (BAPRAS)? , 2010, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[3]  I. Whitaker,et al.  Publication rates for abstracts presented at the British Association of Plastic Surgeons meetings: how do we compare with other specialties? , 2003, British journal of plastic surgery.

[4]  Joseph S Pliskin,et al.  Peer Review in Publication: Factors Associated with the Full-Length Publication of Studies Presented in Abstract Form at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making , 2008, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[5]  G. Knoll,et al.  Factors Associated with Publication Following Presentation at a Transplantation Meeting , 2006, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[6]  Emil H Schemitsch,et al.  Barriers to Full-Text Publication Following Presentation of Abstracts at Annual Orthopaedic Meetings , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  Carlos Eduardo Prata Fernandes Ferrarez,et al.  The Publication Rate of Abstracts Presented at the 2003 Urological Brazilian Meeting , 2009, Clinics.

[8]  E. von Elm,et al.  Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[9]  Christopher S. Ahmad,et al.  Discrepancies and Rates of Publication in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Abstracts , 2008, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  K. Dickersin,et al.  Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. , 1994 .

[11]  Hani Sinno,et al.  Level of Evidence in Plastic Surgery Research , 2011, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  Andrew E Macneily,et al.  Abstracts presented at the American Urological Association Annual Meeting: determinants of subsequent peer reviewed publication. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[13]  Karsten Knobloch,et al.  Discrepancies and rates of publication in orthopaedic sports medicine abstracts. , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  Robert M Califf,et al.  Publication or presentation of results from multicenter clinical trials: evidence from an academic medical center. , 2007, American heart journal.