Two Theories of Home Heat Control

People routinely develop their own theories to explain the world around them. These theories can be useful even when they contradict conventional technical wisdom. Based on in-depth interviews about home heating and thermostat setting behavior, the present study presents two theories people use to understand and adjust their thermostats. The two theories are here called the feedback theory and the valve theory. The valve theory is inconsistent with engineering knowledge, but is estimated to be held by 25% to 50% of Americans. Predictions of each of the theories are compared with the operations normally performed in home heat control. This comparison suggests that the valve theory may be highly functional in normal day-to-day use. Further data is needed on the ways this theory guides behavior in natural environments.

[1]  William C. McCormack,et al.  Directions in cognitive anthropology , 1988 .

[2]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  Cybernetics. , 1948, Scientific American.

[3]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Models of Competence in Solving Physics Problems , 1980, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  P. Johnson-Laird.  Mental models , 1989 .

[5]  Willett Kempton,et al.  General/Theoretical:Mental Models. Dedre Gentner and Albert L. Stevens, eds , 1983 .

[6]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Cultural models in language and thought: Two theories of home heat control , 1987 .

[7]  D. Gentner.  Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[8]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Folk quantification of energy , 1982 .

[9]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[10]  G. Elizabeth Rice,et al.  on cultural schemata , 1980 .

[11]  R. Rappaport,et al.  Ecology, Meaning, and Religion , 1979 .

[12]  Tom Pritchard.  An Foras Forbartha. , 1978 .

[13]  G. Lakoff,et al.  The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English , 1983 .

[14]  G. S. Dutt,et al.  Future energy savings in U.S. housing , 1983 .

[15]  M. F. Wiser,et al.  When heat and temperature were one , 2014 .

[16]  R. Socolow.  Saving energy in the home : Princeton's experiments at Twin Rivers , 1978 .

[17]  D. Holland,et al.  Cultural models in language and thought: An appraisal , 1987 .

[18]  Roy Goodwin D'Andrade,et al.  The Cultural Part of Cognition , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: naive beliefs about the motion of objects. , 1980, Science.

[20]  K. Johnsen,et al.  Energy conservation in the built environment , 1979 .

[21]  N. Quinn,et al.  “commitment” in American marriage: a cultural analysis , 1982 .

[22]  M. McCloskey.  Naive Theories of Motion. , 1982 .

[23]  Michael Cole,et al.  Culture and thought; a psychological introduction , 1974 .

[24]  Willett Kempton,et al.  The Folk Classification of Ceramics: A Study of Cognitive Prototypes , 1981 .

[25]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[26]  E. Hutchins.  Culture and Inference: A Trobriand Case Study , 1980 .

[27]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Unlearning Aristotelian Physics: A Study of Knowledge-Based Learning , 1982, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  Michael Agar,et al.  stories, background knowledge and themes: problems in the analysis of life history narrative , 1980 .

[29]  J. Dauben.  Georg Cantor and the Origins of Transfinite Set Theory , 1983 .