Word problems and a homological niteness condition for monoids

Our purpose is to prove that a monoid which has a 'nice' solution to its word problem satisfies a certain homological finiteness condition. More precisely, we prove: if a monoid S has a finite terminating Church-Rosser presentation, then S is (FP)3; this is Theorem 4.1 below. (See Section 2 for the definition of "terminating" and "Church-Rosser".) Examples of groups that are not (FP)3 are known; see Section 4 for a brief description of several of these. For completeness, we provide an example of a monoid that is not (FP)3' In each case, the monoid (or group) is finitely-presented and has a solvable word problem. These examples answer (in the negative) the following question of Jantzen [15]: does a finitelypresented monoid with a solvable word problem have a finite terminating Church-Rosser presentation? The Church-Rosser property was discovered by Church and Rosser [9] during the course of research on the A-calculus. Properties of terminating relations were investigated by Newman [16]. For a systematic treatment of both topics together with further references, see [14]. Monoids with terminating Church-Rosser presentations have been studied by Nivat [17] and others. See [5] for a recent survey. We conclude this introduction with a brief outline of what follows and some further discussion. Section 1 contains basic results on Noetherian relations. In particular, we develop some tools for dealing with free abelian groups which have a basis ordered by a Noetherian relation. Section 2 introduces terminating and Church-Rosser presentations. (Because of difficulties in verifying that the relation -..,) defined in Section 2 is Noetherian, it is common to assume that the rewriting rules R are length-reducing: if (r, s) E R, then Irl > lsi. We specifically do not make this assumption, so that our terminology differs, for example, from that of [5].) Variations of Theorem 2.1, which gives

[1]  R. Bieri,et al.  Homological dimension of discrete groups , 1981 .

[2]  M. Newman On Theories with a Combinatorial Definition of "Equivalence" , 1942 .

[3]  Kenneth S. Brown,et al.  Finiteness properties of groups , 1987 .

[4]  C. Houghton The first cohomology of a group with permutation module coefficients , 1978 .

[5]  Ronald V. Book,et al.  THUE SYSTEMS AND THE CHURCH-ROSSER PROPERTY: REPLACEMENT SYSTEMS, SPECIFICATION OF FORMAL LANGUAGES, AND PRESENTATIONS OF MONOIDS† , 1983 .

[6]  Maurice Nivat,et al.  Congruences parfaites et quasi-parfaites , 1971 .

[7]  R. Fox,et al.  Free differential calculus. I : Derivation in the free group ring , 1953 .

[8]  Gérard P. Huet,et al.  Confluent Reductions: Abstract Properties and Applications to Term Rewriting Systems , 1980, J. ACM.

[9]  Peter Hilton,et al.  A Course in Homological Algebra , 1972 .

[10]  Kenneth S. Brown,et al.  Cohomology of Groups , 1982 .

[11]  George Gratzer,et al.  Universal Algebra , 1979 .

[12]  Gerard Huet,et al.  Conflunt reductions: Abstract properties and applications to term rewriting systems , 1977, 18th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1977).

[13]  John Stallings,et al.  A FINITELY PRESENTED GROUP WHOSE 3-DIMENSIONAL INTEGRAL HOMOLOGY IS NOT FINITELY GENERArED.* , 1963 .

[14]  Matthias Jantzen A Note on a Special One-Rule Semi-Thue System , 1985, Inf. Process. Lett..

[15]  Robert Bieri A connection between the integral homology and the centre of a rational linear group , 1980 .

[16]  A. Church,et al.  Some properties of conversion , 1936 .