Our purpose is to prove that a monoid which has a 'nice' solution to its word problem satisfies a certain homological finiteness condition. More precisely, we prove: if a monoid S has a finite terminating Church-Rosser presentation, then S is (FP)3; this is Theorem 4.1 below. (See Section 2 for the definition of "terminating" and "Church-Rosser".) Examples of groups that are not (FP)3 are known; see Section 4 for a brief description of several of these. For completeness, we provide an example of a monoid that is not (FP)3' In each case, the monoid (or group) is finitely-presented and has a solvable word problem. These examples answer (in the negative) the following question of Jantzen [15]: does a finitelypresented monoid with a solvable word problem have a finite terminating Church-Rosser presentation? The Church-Rosser property was discovered by Church and Rosser [9] during the course of research on the A-calculus. Properties of terminating relations were investigated by Newman [16]. For a systematic treatment of both topics together with further references, see [14]. Monoids with terminating Church-Rosser presentations have been studied by Nivat [17] and others. See [5] for a recent survey. We conclude this introduction with a brief outline of what follows and some further discussion. Section 1 contains basic results on Noetherian relations. In particular, we develop some tools for dealing with free abelian groups which have a basis ordered by a Noetherian relation. Section 2 introduces terminating and Church-Rosser presentations. (Because of difficulties in verifying that the relation -..,) defined in Section 2 is Noetherian, it is common to assume that the rewriting rules R are length-reducing: if (r, s) E R, then Irl > lsi. We specifically do not make this assumption, so that our terminology differs, for example, from that of [5].) Variations of Theorem 2.1, which gives
[1]
R. Bieri,et al.
Homological dimension of discrete groups
,
1981
.
[2]
M. Newman.
On Theories with a Combinatorial Definition of "Equivalence"
,
1942
.
[3]
Kenneth S. Brown,et al.
Finiteness properties of groups
,
1987
.
[4]
C. Houghton.
The first cohomology of a group with permutation module coefficients
,
1978
.
[5]
Ronald V. Book,et al.
THUE SYSTEMS AND THE CHURCH-ROSSER PROPERTY: REPLACEMENT SYSTEMS, SPECIFICATION OF FORMAL LANGUAGES, AND PRESENTATIONS OF MONOIDS†
,
1983
.
[6]
Maurice Nivat,et al.
Congruences parfaites et quasi-parfaites
,
1971
.
[7]
R. Fox,et al.
Free differential calculus. I : Derivation in the free group ring
,
1953
.
[8]
Gérard P. Huet,et al.
Confluent Reductions: Abstract Properties and Applications to Term Rewriting Systems
,
1980,
J. ACM.
[9]
Peter Hilton,et al.
A Course in Homological Algebra
,
1972
.
[10]
Kenneth S. Brown,et al.
Cohomology of Groups
,
1982
.
[11]
George Gratzer,et al.
Universal Algebra
,
1979
.
[12]
Gerard Huet,et al.
Conflunt reductions: Abstract properties and applications to term rewriting systems
,
1977,
18th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1977).
[13]
John Stallings,et al.
A FINITELY PRESENTED GROUP WHOSE 3-DIMENSIONAL INTEGRAL HOMOLOGY IS NOT FINITELY GENERArED.*
,
1963
.
[14]
Matthias Jantzen.
A Note on a Special One-Rule Semi-Thue System
,
1985,
Inf. Process. Lett..
[15]
Robert Bieri.
A connection between the integral homology and the centre of a rational linear group
,
1980
.
[16]
A. Church,et al.
Some properties of conversion
,
1936
.