Implementation of cerebral autoregulation into computational fluid dynamics studies of cardiopulmonary bypass.

Peri- or postoperative neurological complications are among the main risks for patients undergoing extracorporeal circulatory support (ECC). Two of the main reasons are an increased risk for strokes and altered flow conditions leading to cerebral hypoperfusion. This is strongly affected by cerebral autoregulation, which is the body's intrinsic ability to provide sufficient cerebral blood flow (CBF) despite changes in cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). This complex mechanism has been mainly neglected in numerical studies, which have often been applied for analysis of ECC. In this study, a mathematical model is presented to implement cerebral autoregulation into computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies. CFD simulations of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were performed in a 3D model of the cardiovascular system, with flow variations between 4.5-6 L/min. Cerebral outlets were modeled using an equation to calculate CBF based on CPP. Assuming full regulation, CBF was kept constant for CPP between 80 and 120 mm Hg. A deviation in CBF of 20% occurred for CPP between 55-80 mm Hg and 120-145 mm Hg, respectively. The level of regulation was varied to take possible impairment of cerebral autoregulation into account. Furthermore, chronic hypertension was modeled by increasing the baseline CPP. Results indicate that even for full autoregulation, CBF is decreased during CPB. It is even lower for impaired autoregulation and hypertensive patients, demonstrating the strong impact of autoregulation on CBF. It is therefore imperative to include this mechanism into CFD studies. The presented model can help to improve CPB support conditions based on patient-specific autoregulation parameters.

[1]  Toshiaki Akita,et al.  Three-dimensional numerical simulation of blood flow in the aortic arch during cardiopulmonary bypass. , 2008, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[2]  P. Kilner,et al.  Combined MR imaging and CFD simulation of flow in the human descending aorta , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  W. White,et al.  Neurologic outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. , 2003, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  H. White,et al.  Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Neurotrauma: A Review , 2008, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[5]  A. Ündar,et al.  Detection and Classification of Gaseous Microemboli During Pulsatile and Nonpulsatile Perfusion in a Simulated Neonatal CPB Model , 2007, ASAIO journal.

[6]  Akif Undar,et al.  An Evaluation of the Benefits of Pulsatile versus Nonpulsatile Perfusion during Cardiopulmonary Bypass Procedures in Pediatric and Adult Cardiac Patients , 2006, ASAIO journal.

[7]  Annetine Gelijns,et al.  Left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy: a new look at survival. , 2005, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  Ali Cemal Benim,et al.  Simulation of blood flow in human aorta with emphasis on outlet boundary conditions , 2011 .

[9]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Fluid-structure interaction analysis of a patient-specific right coronary artery with physiological velocity and pressure waveforms , 2009 .

[10]  J. Fraser,et al.  Intraaortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation and Cerebral Autoregulation: an observational study , 2010, BMC anesthesiology.

[11]  P. Corso,et al.  The impact of aortic manipulation on neurologic outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery: a risk-adjusted study. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  R. Panerai Assessment of cerebral pressure autoregulation in humans - a review of measurement methods , 1998, Physiological measurement.

[13]  O B Paulson,et al.  Cerebral autoregulation. , 1990, Cerebrovascular and brain metabolism reviews.

[14]  D. Gallo,et al.  On the Use of In Vivo Measured Flow Rates as Boundary Conditions for Image-Based Hemodynamic Models of the Human Aorta: Implications for Indicators of Abnormal Flow , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  M. Laumen,et al.  Flow distribution during cardiopulmonary bypass in dependency on the outflow cannula positioning. , 2009, Artificial organs.

[16]  G. V. Van Nooten,et al.  Hydrodynamical Comparison of Aortic Arch Cannulae , 1998, The International journal of artificial organs.

[17]  J. Claassen,et al.  Cerebral Autoregulation: An Overview of Current Concepts and Methodology with Special Focus on the Elderly , 2008, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[18]  M. Laumen,et al.  The impact of aortic/subclavian outflow cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiac support: a computational fluid dynamics study. , 2009, Artificial organs.

[19]  J. Hennig,et al.  Time‐resolved 3D MR velocity mapping at 3T: Improved navigator‐gated assessment of vascular anatomy and blood flow , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  Ulrich Steinseifer,et al.  Flow analysis of ventricular assist device inflow and outflow cannula positioning using a naturally shaped ventricle and aortic branch. , 2010, Artificial organs.

[21]  P. Hornick,et al.  Pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion: the continuing controversy. , 1997, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[22]  P. Cervini,et al.  Carotid Doppler Ultrasound Findings in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices , 2010, Ultrasound quarterly.

[23]  Takao Inamura,et al.  Computer-Simulated Fluid Dynamics of Arterial Perfusion in Extracorporeal Circulation: From Reality to Virtual Simulation , 2009, The International journal of artificial organs.

[24]  Ulrich Steinseifer,et al.  Mimicking of cerebral autoregulation by flow-dependent cerebrovascular resistance: a feasibility study. , 2012, Artificial organs.