Study on student performance estimation, student progress analysis, and student potential prediction based on data mining

Abstract Student performance, student progress and student potential are critical for measuring learning results, selecting learning materials and learning activities. However, existing work doesn't provide enough analysis tools to analyze how students performed, which factors would affect their performance, in which way students can make progress, and whether students have potential to perform better. To solve those problems, we have provided multiple analysis tools to analyze student performance, student progress and student potentials in different ways. First, this paper formulates student model with performance related attributes and non-performance related attributes by Student Attribute Matrix (SAM), which quantifies student attributes, so that we can use it to make further analysis. Second, this paper provides a student performance estimation tools using Back Propagation Neural Network (BP-NN) based on classification, which can estimate student performance/attributes according to students' prior knowledge as well as the performance/attributes of other students who have similar characteristics. Third, this paper proposes student progress indicators and attribute causal relationship predicator based on BP-NN to comprehensively describe student progress on various aspects together with their causal relationships. Those indicators and predicator can tell how much a factor would affect student performance, so that we can train up students on purpose. Finally, this paper proposes a student potential function that evaluates student achievement and development of such attributes. We have illustrated our analysis tools by using real academic performance data collected from 60 high school students. Evaluation results show that the proposed tools can give correct and more accurate results, and also offer a better understanding on student progress.

[1]  Fabio A. González,et al.  A Model to Predict Low Academic Performance at a Specific Enrollment Using Data Mining , 2015, IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje.

[2]  B. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1966 .

[3]  R. Felder,et al.  Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. , 1988 .

[4]  Dongsheng Guo,et al.  Common Nature of Learning Between Back-Propagation and Hopfield-Type Neural Networks for Generalized Matrix Inversion With Simplified Models , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[5]  Mats Oscarson,et al.  Mapping language teachers conceptions of student assessment procedures in relation to grading: A tw , 2011 .

[6]  Margaret E. Raymond,et al.  Does School Accountability Lead to Improved Student Performance? , 2004 .

[7]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[8]  W. David Pan,et al.  Fast and accurate global motion estimation algorithm using pixel subsampling , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[9]  Erica S. Lembke,et al.  Using Progress-Monitoring Data to Improve Instructional Decision Making , 2008 .

[10]  Rynson W. H. Lau,et al.  Technology supports for distributed and collaborative learning over the internet , 2008, TOIT.

[11]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment , 2010 .

[12]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Using Curriculum‐Based Measurement to Improve Student Achievement: Review of Research , 2005 .

[13]  Sunday Olusanya Olatunji,et al.  Student performance prediction using Support Vector Machine and K-Nearest Neighbor , 2017, 2017 IEEE 30th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE).

[14]  Eduardo Guzmán,et al.  Improving Student Performance Using Self-Assessment Tests , 2007, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[15]  Rynson W. H. Lau,et al.  An Open Model for Learning Path Construction , 2010, ICWL.

[16]  M. B. Wieling,et al.  The impact of online video lecture recordings and automated feedback on student performance , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Yaacov Petscher,et al.  A Simulation Study on the Performance of the Simple Difference and Covariance-Adjusted Scores in Randomized Experimental Designs. , 2011, Journal of educational measurement.

[18]  Neil T. Heffernan,et al.  Using Mixed-Effects Modeling to Analyze Different Grain-Sized Skill Models in an Intelligent Tutoring System , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[19]  Rynson W. H. Lau,et al.  Fuzzy Cognitive Map Based Student Progress Indicators , 2011, ICWL.

[20]  R Alkhasawneh,et al.  Modeling student retention in science and engineering disciplines using neural networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).

[21]  Sei-Wang Chen,et al.  Attributed concept maps: fuzzy integration and fuzzy matching , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[22]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Contextual Slip and Prediction of Student Performance after Use of an Intelligent Tutor , 2010, UMAP.

[23]  Damian W. Betebenner Norm- and Criterion-Referenced Student Growth. , 2009 .

[24]  Rianne Conijn,et al.  Predicting Student Performance from LMS Data: A Comparison of 17 Blended Courses Using Moodle LMS , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[25]  Antonija Mitrovic Investigating Students' Self-Assessment Skills , 2001, User Modeling.

[26]  Hahn-Ming Lee,et al.  Personalized e-learning system using Item Response Theory , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Tai A. Collins,et al.  Developing a Change-Sensitive Brief Behavior Rating Scale as a Progress Monitoring Tool for Social Behavior: An Example Using the Social Skills Rating System—Teacher Form , 2010 .

[28]  A. Gokhale Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking , 1995 .

[29]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms , 1981, Advanced Applications in Pattern Recognition.