Challenges and Opportunities for Group Learning and Group Learning Researchers

Purpose – We explore two characteristics of groups in today's work environments, membership dispersion and geographic dispersion, and the effects that these conditions have on group and organizational learning. Approach – We integrate findings on group membership dispersion and geographic dispersion and develop predictions of dispersion's effects on group learning, incorporating the literature on knowledge transfer, transactive memory, turnover, and communication. Findings – Members in multiple work groups, while exposed to knowledge from different areas, have weaker group identities and are more adversely affected by time constraints than members who belong to only one group. Group members can be dispersed sequentially through turnover, which creates more knowledge-retention problems than those experienced by stable groups. Members of geographically dispersed groups are in positions to integrate novel knowledge. The necessary use of technology to communicate, however, reduces the ability of geographically dispersed group members to convey ideas as effectively as their collocated counterparts. Geographically distributed group members experience less common ground and more difficulty in transferring knowledge, especially tacit knowledge, than their collocated counterparts. Originality/value – We discuss how membership and geographic dispersion pose challenges to and provide opportunities for group learning. We suggest how learning within dispersed groups can be supported as well as what the future holds for the role of these groups in the new economy. The chapter concludes that although membership and geographic dispersion pose challenges to learning at the group level, these conditions enable learning at the level of the organization.

[1]  C. Insko,et al.  Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: categorization, reciprocation, or fear? , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Henrik Bresman,et al.  External Learning Activities and Team Performance: A Multimethod Field Study , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[3]  L. Thompson,et al.  Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity , 2005 .

[4]  Aimée A. Kane,et al.  Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality , 2005 .

[5]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Virtual Teams versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System* , 1997 .

[6]  Linda Argote,et al.  Superordinate Identity and Knowledge Creation and Transfer in Organizations , 2009 .

[7]  Rob Cross,et al.  A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Manju K. Ahuja,et al.  Socialization in Virtual Groups , 2003 .

[9]  W. Orlikowski Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[10]  John C. Turner,et al.  Rediscovering the Social Group , 1987 .

[11]  R. Moreland,et al.  Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[12]  Christina Fang,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation through Structural Design: The Isolation of Subgroups and Organization Learning , 2008 .

[13]  E. Thorndike “Animal Intelligence” , 1898, Nature.

[14]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Kyle Lewis Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[17]  A. Hollingshead Information Suppression and Status Persistence in Group Decision Making The Effects of Communication Media , 1996 .

[18]  D. R. Dalton,et al.  Turnover turned over: an expanded and positive perspective. , 1979, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[19]  C. Cramton The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[20]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams , 2007, MIS Q..

[21]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. , 1995 .

[22]  J. Walther Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[23]  Abraham B. Shani,et al.  Organizational learning mechanisms and continuous improvement , 1997 .

[24]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. , 1973 .

[25]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  The Acquisition, Transfer, and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises , 1995 .

[26]  L. Argote Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[27]  Linda Argote,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Microstructure of Knowledge Acquisition and Transfer Through Learning by Doing , 1996, Oper. Res..

[28]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Unraveling the Temporal Fabric of Knowledge Conversion: A Model of Media Selection and Use , 2006, MIS Q..

[29]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  When using knowledge can hurt performance: the value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company , 2005 .

[30]  John R. Austin Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[32]  Tanya Menon,et al.  Tainted Knowledge vs. Tempting Knowledge: People Avoid Knowledge from Internal Rivals and Seek Knowledge from External Rivals , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[33]  L. L. Thurstone,et al.  The learning curve equation , 1919 .

[34]  Laura A. Hambley,et al.  Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes , 2007 .

[35]  P. Goodman,et al.  New Forms of Work Groups: Exocentric Teams , 2003 .

[36]  M. Turner GROUPS AT WORK: THEORY AND RESEARCH , 2002 .

[37]  John M. Levine,et al.  Minority influence in work teams: The impact of newcomers ☆ , 2004 .

[38]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. , 2004 .

[39]  Robert S. Huckman,et al.  Managing the Impact of Employee Turnover on Performance: The Role of Process Conformance , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[40]  Amy J. Hillman,et al.  Directors' Multiple Identities, Identification, and Board Monitoring and Resource Provision , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[41]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[42]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  An Investigation of Partner Similarity Dimensions on Knowledge Transfer , 2000 .

[43]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Familiarity, Complexity, and Team Performance in Geographically Distributed Software Development , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[44]  Mark Mortensen,et al.  Go (Con)Figure: Subgroups, Imbalance, and Isolates in Geographically Dispersed Teams , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[45]  Shankar Ganesan,et al.  Does Distance Still Matter? Geographic Proximity and New Product Development , 2005 .

[46]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[47]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  The use of visual information in shared visual spaces: informing the development of virtual co-presence , 2002, CSCW '02.

[48]  Andrea B. Hollingshead,et al.  Groupand Individual Training , 1998 .

[49]  Roberto A. Weber,et al.  Cultural Conflict and Merger Failure: An Experimental Approach , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[50]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of , 2022 .

[51]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Multiple professional identities: examining differences in identification across work-related targets. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[52]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  Extending the Faultline Model to Geographically Dispersed Teams: How Colocated Subgroups can Impair Group Functioning , 2006 .

[53]  Brenda White,et al.  DEPARTMENT OF LABOR , 2006 .

[54]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  The Impact of Knowledge Coordination on Virtual Team Performance Over Time , 2007, MIS Q..

[55]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[56]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[57]  Jonathon N. Cummings Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[58]  Dick F. Swaab,et al.  Sex differences in the effects of visual contact and eye contact in negotiations , 2009 .

[59]  Linda Argote,et al.  Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. , 1996 .

[60]  Paul M. Muchinsky,et al.  Employee Turnover: An Empirical and Methodological Assessment. , 1979 .

[61]  C. Gersick,et al.  Habitual routines in task-performing groups. , 1990, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[62]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[63]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[64]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication , 2005 .

[65]  D. Rousseau,et al.  Trends in organizational behavior , 2000 .

[66]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Radical Innovation Without Collocation: A Case Study at Boeing-Rocketdyne , 2001, MIS Q..

[67]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Using Visual Information for Grounding and Awareness in Collaborative Tasks , 2012, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[68]  J. Stuart Bunderson,et al.  Power Asymmetry and Learning in Teams: The Moderating Role of Performance Feedback , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[69]  E. H. Bax,et al.  Is High Employee Turnover Really Harmful? An Empirical Test Using Company Records , 2004 .

[70]  Margaret A. Neale,et al.  Who's Really Sharing? Effects of Social and Expert Status on Knowledge Exchange Within Groups , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[71]  Hermann Ebbinghaus,et al.  Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology. , 1987, Annals of neurosciences.

[72]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry , 1998 .

[73]  Kathleen M. Carley Organizational Learning and Personnel Turnover , 1992 .

[74]  W. Stanley Siebert,et al.  SEARCHING FOR THE OPTIMAL LEVEL OF EMPLOYEE TURNOVER: A STUDY OF A LARGE U.K. RETAIL ORGANIZATION , 2009 .

[75]  Jonathan L. Johnson,et al.  Turnover, Social Capital Losses, and Performance , 2005 .

[76]  K. Sutcliffe,et al.  Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[77]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Knowledge and Performance in Knowledge-Worker Teams: A Longitudinal Study of Transactive Memory Systems , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[78]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Collaborating on contributions to conversations , 1987 .

[79]  Peter Foreman,et al.  Members' Identification with Multiple-Identity Organizations , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[80]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts , 2001 .

[81]  Sze-Sze Wong,et al.  Distal and Local Group Learning: Performance Trade-offs and Tensions , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[82]  Yuqing Ren,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems 1985–2010: An Integrative Framework of Key Dimensions, Antecedents, and Consequences , 2011 .

[83]  Gabriel Szulanski Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[84]  Andrea B. Hollingshead,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems in Organizations: Matching Tasks, Expertise, and People , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[85]  Paul V. Martorana,et al.  What Do Groups Learn from Their Worldliest Members? Direct and Indirect Influence in Dynamic Teams , 2000 .

[86]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Organizational Routines Are Stored as Procedural Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study , 1994 .

[87]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Perspective - Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[88]  John W. Boudreau,et al.  Voluntary turnover and job performance: Curvilinearity and the moderating influences of salary growth and promotions. , 1997 .

[89]  S. Worchel,et al.  Psychology of intergroup relations , 1986 .

[90]  John E. Delery,et al.  Alternative Conceptualizations of the Relationship Between Voluntary Turnover and Organizational Performance , 2005 .

[91]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[92]  Linda Argote,et al.  Individual Experience and Experience Working Together: Predicting Learning Rates from Knowing Who Knows What and Knowing How to Work Together , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[93]  John L. Cotton,et al.  Employee Turnover: A Meta-Analysis and Review with Implications for Research , 1986 .

[94]  J. McGrath Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[95]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". , 1996, Psychological review.

[96]  D. Denison,et al.  From Chimneys to Cross-Functional Teams: Developing and Validating a Diagnostic Model , 1996 .

[97]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling Unshared Information: The Benefits of Knowing How Access to Information Is Distributed among Group Members , 2000 .

[98]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Knowing What We Know: Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in Social Networks , 2001 .

[99]  Ilan Oshri,et al.  Knowledge transfer in globally distributed teams: the role of transactive memory , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[100]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Identifying Organizational Identification , 1992 .

[101]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[102]  B. Sparrow,et al.  Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips , 2011, Science.

[103]  Linda Argote,et al.  Organizational Learning and Forgetting: The Effects of Turnover and Structure , 2006 .

[104]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Managerial mobility and turnover: A longitudinal study , 1977 .

[105]  D. Wegner Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[106]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  THE CONTEXTS FOR GEOGRAPHICALLY DISPERSED TEAMS AND NETWORKS , 1999 .

[107]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[108]  Linda Argote,et al.  Group Learning Curves: The Effects of Turnover and Task Complexity on Group Performance1 , 1995 .

[109]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[110]  A. Hollingshead Communication, Learning, and Retrieval in Transactive Memory Systems☆☆☆ , 1998 .

[111]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge ☆ , 2007 .

[112]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[113]  Michael J. Platow,et al.  Social Identity at Work : Developing Theory for Organizational Practice , 2014 .

[114]  M. Abelson,et al.  Optimal and dysfunctional turnover: toward an organizational level model. , 1984, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[115]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[116]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[117]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[118]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group decision making and communication technology , 1992 .

[119]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Affect in Computer-Meditated Communication: An Experiment in Synchronous Terminal-to-Terminal Discussion , 1985, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[120]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. , 2001 .

[121]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Do good or poor performers leave? A meta-analysis of the relationship between performance and turnover. , 1987 .

[122]  Norris M. Haynes,et al.  Parent Involvement in Schools: An Ecological Approach , 1991, The Elementary School Journal.

[123]  A. Edmondson,et al.  6 Three Perspectives on Team Learning: Outcome Improvement, Task Mastery, and Group Process , 2007 .

[124]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Group learning in organizations. , 2001 .

[125]  Donald B. Trow Membership Succession and Team Performance , 1960 .