Differences in relative frequency facilitate learning abstract rules

Humans learn the rules that govern how the elements of their language are organized over an input that is often not homogeneous (it might contain noise, or even include rules from different linguistic systems, as it might be the case for bilinguals). In the present study we explore the conditions under which participants can learn an abstract rule when it is presented in a heterogeneous context. Results from six experiments show that listeners can learn a token-independent rule even if it is presented together with some exemplars that implement a different regularity (Experiment 1a and 1b). In fact, learning rules from an input containing several patterns does not seem to differ from learning them from an input containing only one (Experiment 1c). More surprisingly, we observed that listeners can even learn an abstract rule that is only implemented over 10% of the exemplars that compose a familiarization stream (Experiments 2a and 2b). When the proportion of tokens implementing the target and the non-target rules is balanced, we did not observe any learning (Experiment 3). Our results suggest that listeners use differences in relative frequency to keep separate linguistic rules apart. This allows them to learn different abstract regularities from a non-homogeneous linguistic signal.

[1]  R. Knight,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Involuntary Attention to Acoustic Novelty and Change , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Federica Bulgarelli,et al.  Anchors aweigh: The impact of overlearning on entrenchment effects in statistical learning. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Thierry Dutoit,et al.  The MBROLA project: towards a set of high quality speech synthesizers free of use for non commercial purposes , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[4]  A. Endress,et al.  Rapid learning of syllable classes from a perceptually continuous speech stream , 2007, Cognition.

[5]  Jenny R. Saffran,et al.  All Together Now: Concurrent Learning of Multiple Structures in an Artificial Language , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  A unified model for perceptual learning , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  Word frequency as a cue for identifying function words in infancy , 2010, Cognition.

[8]  Chip Gerfen,et al.  Speech Segmentation in a Simulated Bilingual Environment: A Challenge for Statistical Learning? , 2009, Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development.

[9]  Fenna H Poletiek,et al.  Short Article: What is Learned about Fragments in Artificial Grammar Learning? A Transitional Probabilities Approach , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  R. Gómez,et al.  Does hearing two dialects at different times help infants learn dialect-specific rules? , 2015, Cognition.

[11]  J. Werker,et al.  Prosody cues word order in 7-month-old bilingual infants , 2013, Nature Communications.

[12]  J. Mehler,et al.  Bootstrapping word order in prelexical infants: A Japanese–Italian cross-linguistic study , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  Marina Nespor,et al.  Perceptual and memory constraints on language acquisition , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Richard N. Aslin,et al.  Changing Structures in Midstream: Learning Along the Statistical Garden Path , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  Josje Verhagen,et al.  Language learning from inconsistent input: Bilingual and monolingual toddlers compared , 2017 .

[16]  Ágnes Melinda Kovács,et al.  Hierarchical Processing in Seven-Month-Old Infants , 2014 .

[17]  Peter M. Vishton,et al.  Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. , 1999, Science.

[18]  Richard N. Aslin,et al.  Sampling over Nonuniform Distributions: A Neural Efficiency Account of the Primacy Effect in Statistical Learning , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Krista Byers-Heinlein,et al.  Languages As Categories: Reframing the “One Language or Two” Question in Early Bilingual Development , 2014 .

[20]  M. Nespor,et al.  Frequency-based organization of speech sequences in a nonhuman animal , 2016, Cognition.

[21]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Unattended exposure to components of speech sounds yields same benefits as explicit auditory training , 2010, Cognition.

[22]  S. Soto-Faraco,et al.  Generalizing linguistic structures under high attention demands. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  J. Mehler,et al.  Flexible Learning of Multiple Speech Structures in Bilingual Infants , 2009, Science.

[24]  J. Hochmann Word frequency, function words and the second gavagai problem , 2013, Cognition.

[25]  R. Gómez,et al.  A first step in form-based category abstraction by 12-month-old infants. , 2004, Developmental science.

[26]  LouAnn Gerken,et al.  Decisions, decisions: infant language learning when multiple generalizations are possible , 2006, Cognition.