Prototypes as Objects of Desire

We set out to explore the role of prototypes as instruments of knowledge for HCI research. We pursue an epistemological inquiry on 'how' prototypes can be used when users, designers and researchers work in common on the development of future technological objects. First, we offer critical commentary on prototypes as instruments of knowledge by engaging with existing literature. Under-explored themes are developed to argue for approaching prototypes as objects of desire. Desires are different from needs and requirements and ought to be considered more directly in research prototyping processes. We identify five roles for prototypes as objects of desire for research and articulate four seeding dynamics that govern exploration of future use. These are exemplified through analysis of two cases where groups of people were working in common around designing interactive objects. We conclude that prototypes as objects of desire allow exploration of 'yet-to-be-known' shared technology beyond needs and requirements.

[1]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  Piggyback Prototyping: Using Existing, Large-Scale Social Computing Systems to Prototype New Ones , 2015, CHI.

[2]  David Benyon.  Designing interactive systems : a comprehensive guide to HCI, UX and interaction design , 2013 .

[3]  Morten Kyng,et al.  A Tool Perspective on Design of Interactive Computer Support for Skilled Workers , 1986 .

[4]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[5]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Timeline collaboration , 2010, CHI.

[6]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  Cooperative Prototyping: Users and Designers in Mutual Activity , 1990, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[7]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  Design in Action: From Prototyping by Demonstration to Cooperative Prototyping , 1992 .

[8]  Christopher Hoadley,et al.  What is design knowledge and how do we teach it , 2008 .

[9]  Peter Danholt,et al.  Prototypes as performative , 2005, Critical Computing.

[10]  Elisa Giaccardi,et al.  Metadesign as an Emergent Design Culture , 2005, Leonardo.

[11]  Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose,et al.  Participatory IT in semi-public spaces , 2014, NordiCHI.

[12]  Pär-Ola Zander.  Collaborative Process Change by Inscription - a Contested Terrain for Interaction Designers , 2007 .

[13]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Fail whaling: designing from deviance and failures in social computing , 2012, CHI EA '12.

[14]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Ways of Knowing in HCI , 2014, Springer New York.

[15]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Living In A Prototype: A Reconfigured Space , 2016, CHI.

[16]  Nadir Weibel,et al.  Learning from failure: designing for complex sociotechnical systems , 2017, UbiComp/ISWC Adjunct.

[17]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach To User Interface Design , 1990 .

[18]  J. Dewey.  Democracy and education : an introduction to the philosophy of education , 1961 .

[19]  Richard Banks,et al.  From Research Prototype to Research Product , 2016, CHI.

[20]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas , 2008, TCHI.

[21]  Henk Sol,et al.  Prototyping: A Methodological Assessment , 1984 .

[22]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[23]  Marx W. Wartofsky,et al.  Models: Representation And The Scientific Understanding , 1979 .

[24]  Ge Wei.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.) , 2017 .

[25]  Jeanette Blomberg,et al.  Working artefacts: ethnomethods of the prototype. , 2002, The British journal of sociology.

[26]  Tuck Wah Leong,et al.  Identity, performativity, and HCI , 2012, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[27]  C. Floyd.  A Systematic Look at Prototyping , 1984 .

[28]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Cooperation in massively distributed information space , 2001, ECSCW.

[29]  Jentery Sayers,et al.  Prototyping the Past , 2015 .

[30]  Niels Olof Bouvin,et al.  AdapForms: A Framework for Creating and Validating Adaptive Forms , 2011, ICWE.

[31]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research , 2012, TCHI.

[32]  Matthias Budde,et al.  Experiences and failures from two decades in embedded system design , 2017, UbiComp/ISWC Adjunct.

[33]  Olav W. Bertelsen,et al.  Elements of a theory of design artefacts - a contribution to critical systems development research , 1998, DAIMI PB.

[34]  Randi Markussen,et al.  Politics of intervention in design: Feminist reflections on the Scandinavian tradition , 1996, AI & SOCIETY.

[35]  Peter Gall Krogh,et al.  Ways of Drifting: 5 Methods of Experimentation in Research through Design , 2015 .

[36]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Between Initial Familiarity and Future Use: A Case of Collocated Collaborative Writing , 2014, COOP.

[37]  S. Bødker,et al.  Scenarios as Springboards in Design , 1993 .

[38]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  The epistemology & evaluation of experience-focused hci , 2009 .

[39]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research , 2014 .

[40]  Kaj Grønbæk.  Rapid Prototyping With Fourth Generation Systems – An Empirical Study , 1989 .

[41]  Mike Robinson,et al.  Design for Unanticipated Use , 1993, ECSCW.

[42]  Alekseĭ Nikolaevich Leontʹev.  Problems of the development of the mind , 1981 .

[43]  R. Miettinen,et al.  Epistemic Objects, Artefacts and Organizational Change , 2005 .

[44]  Charles Hill,et al.  What do Prototypes Prototype , 1997 .

[45]  K. K. Cetina.  Sociality with Objects , 1997 .

[46]  William Buxton,et al.  Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time) , 2008, CHI.

[47]  Pierre Gisel.  Paul Ricoeur , 1974 .

[48]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The Meaning of Interactivity—Some Proposals for Definitions and Measures , 2017, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[49]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning , 2014 .

[50]  Jentery Sayers,et al.  Design without a future , 2016, Interactions.

[51]  Matthias Budde,et al.  Lessons from failures in designing and conducting experimental studies: a brief anecdotal tutorial , 2017, UbiComp/ISWC Adjunct.

[52]  Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose,et al.  Computational alternatives in participatory design: putting the t back in socio-technical research , 2016, PDC.

[53]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Biographical Prototypes: Reimagining Recognition and Disability in Design , 2019, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[54]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World , 2002 .

[55]  Jacky Swan,et al.  Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration , 2012, Organ. Sci..