DIFFERENCES IN DROUGHT ADAPTATION BETWEEN SUBSPECIES OF SAGEBRUSH (ARTEMISIA TRIDENTATA)

Three subspecies of Artemisia tridentataoccupy distinct habitats in the Great Basin of North America: ssp. wyomingensis in low, arid elevations; ssp. vaseyana in high, mesic elevations; and ssp. tridentata in intermediate zones. We evaluated differences in the drought experienced and drought tolerance among the subspecies. Drought tolerance was measured by two traits: the xylem pressure (Cx) causing xylem cavitation and Cx causing loss of leaf turgor (Ctlp). As expected from habitat, ssp. wyomingensisexperienced a more severe summer drought than ssp. vaseyana (minimum Cx 52 7.5 MPa and 23.8 MPa, respectively). Despite the large difference in drought exposure, the subspecies ex- hibited similar drought responses, including a reduction in transpiration ( E) below 0.5 mmol·s 21 ·m 22 , a shedding of 60-65% of foliage, and .95% decline in soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance. The similarity in the drought response was consistent with pronounced dif- ferences in Cx, causing 50% loss in xylem conductivity by cavitation (C50). The C50 was 24.9 MPa in ssp. wyomingensis vs. 23.0 MPa in ssp. vaseyana; ssp. tridentata was in- termediate (C50 52 3.9 MPa). Differences in cavitation resistance were preserved in a common garden, suggesting that they arose by genetic differentiation. A water transport model indicated that the greater cavitation resistance in ssp. wyomingensiswas a necessary adaptation for its more arid habitat, and that the similar restrictions of E among subspecies were required to avoid hydraulic failure. The Ctlp was also lower in ssp. wyomingensisthan in ssp. vaseyana. Although Ctlp decreased in both subspecies during drought, the adjustment was not sufficient to maintain turgor. Turgor loss may have been adaptive in minimizing shoot growth and stomatal conductance under hydraulically limiting circumstances.

[1]  William T. Pockman,et al.  Sustained and significant negative water pressure in xylem , 1995, Nature.

[2]  S. Davis,et al.  Biophysical Perspectives of Xylem Evolution: is there a Tradeoff of Hydraulic Efficiency for Vulnerability to Dysfunction? , 1994 .

[3]  E. Newman RESISTANCE TO WATER FLOW IN SOIL AND PLANT I. SOIL RESISTANCE IN RELATION TO AMOUNTS OF ROOT: THEORETICAL , 1969 .

[4]  A. Diest Principles of Soil-Plant Interrelationships , 1992 .

[5]  Gaylon S. Campbell,et al.  Soil physics with BASIC :transport models for soil-plant systems , 1985 .

[6]  J. Sperry,et al.  Do woody plants operate near the point of catastrophic xylem dysfunction caused by dynamic water stress? : answers from a model. , 1988, Plant physiology.

[7]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  On solving the non-linear diffusion equation for the radial flow of water to roots , 1968 .

[8]  E. Schulze Response to Dr P. J. Kramer's article , 1988 .

[9]  J. Sperry,et al.  A method for measuring xylem hydraulic conductance and embolism in entire root and shoot systems , 1996 .

[10]  Thomas M. Hinckley,et al.  Water relations of drought hardy shrubs: osmotic potential and stomatal reactivity , 1980 .

[11]  G. Campbell,et al.  The Effects of Texture on the Resistance to Water Movement within the Rhizosphere , 1984 .

[12]  Frederick R. Adler,et al.  Limitation of plant water use by rhizosphere and xylem conductance: results from a model , 1998 .

[13]  D. C. Freeman,et al.  CHROMOSOMAL STUDIES OF SUBGENUS TRIDENTATAE OF ARTEMISIA: EVIDENCE FOR AUTOPOLYPLOIDY , 1981 .

[14]  M. Hipkins,et al.  Gas penetration of pit membranes in the xylem of Rhododendron as the cause of acoustically detectable sap cavitation , 1985 .

[15]  G. D. Booth,et al.  Seedling growth rate of 3 subspecies of big sagebrush. , 1990 .

[16]  N. Holmgren,et al.  Intermountain Flora; Vascular Plants of the Intermountain West, U.S.A., , 1977 .

[17]  T. Hinckley,et al.  A Comparison of Pressure-Volume Curve Data Analysis Techniques , 1985 .

[18]  J. Sperry,et al.  New evidence for large negative xylem pressures and their measurement by the pressure chamber method , 1996 .

[19]  S. O. Link,et al.  Rehydration‐induced changes in pressure‐volume relationships of Artemisia tridentata Nutt. ssp. tridentata , 1990 .

[20]  E. Durant,et al.  Growth Rate Differences among Big Sagebrush [ Artemisia tridentata ] Accessions and Subspecies , 1999 .

[21]  D. McDermitt Sources of error in the estimation of stomatal conductance and transpiration from porometer data. , 1990 .

[22]  Paul J. Kramer,et al.  Changing concepts regarding plant water relations , 1988 .

[23]  B. Welch,et al.  Growth rate differences among big sagebrush (Artemisis tridentata) accessions and subspecies Utah. , 1982 .

[24]  J. Barker,et al.  Differences in big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) plant stature along soil-water gradients: genetic components. , 1986 .

[25]  J. O. Rawlings,et al.  The Weibull Function as a Dose‐Response Model to Describe Ozone Effects on Crop Yields 1 , 1985 .

[26]  M. Zimmermann Xylem Structure and the Ascent of Sap , 1983, Springer Series in Wood Science.

[27]  Melvin T. Tyree,et al.  A method for measuring hydraulic conductivity and embolism in xylem , 1988 .

[28]  Melvin T. Tyree,et al.  The Measurement of the Turgor Pressure and the Water Relations of Plants by the Pressure-bomb Technique , 1972 .

[29]  William T. Pockman,et al.  Use of centrifugal force in the study of xylem cavitation , 1997 .

[30]  R. D. Evans,et al.  Osmotic relations of the drought‐tolerant shrub Artemisia tridentata in response to water stress , 1992 .