A semi-tensor product approach for Probabilistic Boolean Networks

Modeling genetic regulatory networks is an important issue in systems biology. Various models and mathematical formalisms have been proposed in the literature to solve the capture problem. The main purpose in this paper is to show that the transition matrix generated under semi-tensor product approach (Here we call it the probability structure matrix for simplicity) and the traditional approach (Transition probability matrix) are similar to each other. And we shall discuss three important problems in Probabilistic Boolean Networks (PBNs): the dynamic of a PBN, the steady-state probability distribution and the inverse problem. Numerical examples are given to show the validity of our theory. We shall give a brief introduction to semi-tensor and its application. After that we shall focus on the main results: to show the similarity of these two matrices. Since the semi-tensor approach gives a new way for interpreting a BN and therefore a PBN, we expect that advanced algorithms can be developed if one can describe the PBN through semi-tensor product approach.

[1]  T. Mestl,et al.  A mathematical framework for describing and analysing gene regulatory networks. , 1995, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  B. Drossel,et al.  Number and length of attractors in a critical Kauffman model with connectivity one. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[3]  Fangfei Li,et al.  Stability and stabilization issue of probabilistic Boolean network , 2011, Proceedings of the 30th Chinese Control Conference.

[4]  S. Kauffman Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  Daizhan Cheng,et al.  A Linear Representation of Dynamics of Boolean Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[6]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Modelling Gene Expression Data using Dynamic Bayesian Networks , 2006 .

[7]  Daizhan Cheng,et al.  Model Construction via Observed Data , 2011 .

[8]  Marcel J. T. Reinders,et al.  Linear Modeling of Genetic Networks from Experimental Data , 2000, ISMB.

[9]  W. Ching,et al.  Construction of Probabilistic Boolean Networks from a Prescribed Transition Probability Matrix: A Maximum Entropy Rate Approach , 2011 .

[10]  W. Ching,et al.  Generating probabilistic Boolean networks from a prescribed transition probability matrix. , 2009, IET systems biology.

[11]  M. Aldana Boolean dynamics of networks with scale-free topology , 2003 .

[12]  Xi Chen,et al.  Generating probabilistic Boolean networks from a prescribed stationary distribution , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[13]  M. Margaliot Controllability and observability of Boolean control networks , 2012 .

[14]  Chu Tianguang,et al.  Optimal control of steady-state probability distributions of Probabilistic Boolean Networks , 2013, Proceedings of the 32nd Chinese Control Conference.

[15]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Probabilistic Boolean networks: a rule-based uncertainty model for gene regulatory networks , 2002, Bioinform..

[16]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[17]  L. O’Driscoll Gene Expression Profiling , 2011, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[18]  Albert,et al.  Dynamics of complex systems: scaling laws for the period of boolean networks , 2000, Physical review letters.

[19]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Probabilistic Boolean Networks - The Modeling and Control of Gene Regulatory Networks , 2010 .

[20]  Sui Huang Gene expression profiling, genetic networks, and cellular states: an integrating concept for tumorigenesis and drug discovery , 1999, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[21]  T. Ørntoft,et al.  Gene expression profiling: monitoring transcription and translation products using DNA microarrays and proteomics , 2000, FEBS letters.