The Dynamics of Foreign Policy Agenda Setting

Theoretical and empirical work on public policy agenda setting has ignored foreign policy. We develop a theory of foreign policy agenda setting and test the implications using time-series vector autoregression and Box-Tiao (1975) impact assessment methods. We theorize an economy of attention to foreign policy issues driven by issue inertia, events external to U.S. domestic institutions, as well as systemic attention to particular issues. We also theorize that the economy of attention is affected by a law of scarcity and the rise and fall of events in competing issue areas. Using measures of presidential and media attention to the Soviet Union, Arab-Israeli conflict, and Bosnian conflict, we show that presidential and media attentions respond to issue inertia and exogenous events in both primary and competing issue areas. Media attention also affects presidential attention, but the president does not affect issue attention by the media.

[1]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Intervention Analysis with Applications to Economic and Environmental Problems , 1975 .

[2]  C. Bosso,et al.  Pesticides and politics : the life cycle of a public issue , 1988 .

[3]  Jack L. Walker.  Setting the Agenda in the U.S. Senate: A Theory of Problem Selection , 1977, British Journal of Political Science.

[4]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics , 1989 .

[5]  P. Light,et al.  The President's Agenda , 1982 .

[6]  I. Crespi.  Manipulating public opinion , 1976 .

[7]  J. E. Anderson.  Public Policymaking: An Introduction , 1975 .

[8]  B. Jones,et al.  Agendas and instability in American politics , 1993 .

[9]  L. Lyons,et al.  The Press and Foreign Policy , 1964 .

[10]  B. Hinckley,et al.  Less than Meets the Eye: Foreign Policy Making and the Myth of the Assertive Congress , 1994 .

[11]  J. Lindsay,et al.  Congress and the Politics of U.S. Foreign Policy , 1994 .

[12]  J. Cohen.  Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda , 1995 .

[13]  Charles O. Jones.  An introduction to the study of public policy , 1977 .

[14]  C. Sims.  MACROECONOMICS AND REALITY , 1977 .

[15]  John R. Freeman,et al.  Vector Autoregression and the Study of Politics , 1989 .

[16]  Jennifer L. Merolla,et al.  The Politics of Major Policy Reform in Postwar America: Follow the Leader , 2014 .

[17]  Randall B. Ripley,et al.  Congress resurgent : foreign and defense policy on Capitol Hill , 1993 .

[18]  Brian W. Hogwood,et al.  In Search of the Issue-Attention Cycle , 1985, The Journal of Politics.

[19]  Philip A. Schrodt,et al.  Validity Assessment of a Machine-Coded Event Data Set for the Middle East, 1982-92 , 1994 .

[20]  C. Granger.  Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods , 1969 .

[21]  S. Iyengar,et al.  News That Matters: Television and American Opinion , 1987 .

[22]  Charles D. Elder,et al.  Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building , 1975 .

[23]  B. Jones.  Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice, and Public Policy , 1994 .

[24]  Arthur Meier Schlesinger,et al.  The Imperial Presidency , 1973 .

[25]  George C. Edwards.  Explaining presidential approval: the significance of issue salience , 1995 .

[26]  Bernard Cecil Cohen.  Press and Foreign Policy , 1957 .

[27]  E. Wittkopf.  Faces of Internationalism: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy , 1991 .

[28]  David C. Kozak.  Congress, the Bureaucracy, and Public Policy , 1980 .

[29]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[30]  E. Ziegel.  Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics , 1989 .