The promise of positive deviants: bridging divides between scientific research and local practices in smallholder agriculture

Positive deviants challenge existing organisational structures and institutional set-ups, and promote alternative approaches to solving seemingly intractable social problems, either playing direct role of a boundary spanner or indirect role as activists. However, these roles of positive deviants have not yet been recognised to its potential in international development because the legacy of deviancy theory lies on negative deviants, such as addicts and criminals. This paper investigates the promise of positive deviants to bridging scientific research and local practices using empirical evidence from community-based participatory research of rice, a crucial subsistence crop in the Chitwan district of Nepal. Non-profit private and public stakeholders worked as boundary spanners, specifically to initiate stakeholder interaction with non-traditional partners, in spite of the lack of enabling environments to do so. Similarly, one of the members of a farmers' group developed a rice variety from a handful of seeds taken from a scientific experimental plot, initially without the knowledge of participating scientists. This research suggests that positive deviants have ingenuity to innovate, deviating from norms particularly when social and organisational environments limit stakeholder interaction for learning and innovation. This paper concludes that the collective intelligence of positive deviants can sustain or even stimulate innovation permitting people to survive, experiment new ways of doing things and even improve their living conditions under adverse social, political and agro-ecological circumstances.

[1]  J. Witcombe Participatory Approaches to Plant Breeding and Selection By , 1996 .

[2]  Isaiah Berlin,et al.  Two Concepts of Liberty , 1958 .

[3]  Quy-Toan Do,et al.  Poverty, Social Divisions, and Conflict in Nepal , 2007 .

[4]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[5]  S. Ceccarelli,et al.  Plant breeding with farmers requires testing the assumptions of conventional plant breeding: lessons from the ICARDA barley program. , 2002 .

[6]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[7]  B. Sthapit,et al.  Machhapuchhre 3 (MP3), the First Rice Variety Developed through a Participatory Plant Breeding Approach Released for Mid to High Altitudes of Nepal , 1997 .

[8]  Nancy J. Hirschmann The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom , 2002 .

[9]  J. Sternin,et al.  The power of positive deviancy. An effort to reduce malnutrition in Vietnam offers an important lesson about managing change. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[10]  Albert O. Hirschman,et al.  Exit, Voice, and Loyalty , 1970 .

[11]  Margareta Sollenberg,et al.  To Cultivate Peace: Agriculture in a World of Conflict , 1999 .

[12]  L. Ryhammar,et al.  The Creative Climate: Its Determinants and Effects at a Swedish University , 1999 .

[13]  Danielle E. Warren Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations , 2003 .

[14]  R. Merton The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action , 1936 .

[15]  Dor Bahadur Bista Book Review: Fatalism and Development: Nepal's Struggle for Modernization , 1996 .

[16]  S. Biggs LEARNING FROM THE POSITIVE TO REDUCE RURAL POVERTY AND INCREASE SOCIAL JUSTICE: INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATIONS IN AGRICULTURAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT , 2008, Experimental Agriculture.

[17]  R. Merton Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[18]  Cosmas Milton Obote Ochieng Development through Positive Deviance and its Implications for Economic Policy Making and Public Administration in Africa: The Case of Kenyan Agricultural Development, 1930–2005 , 2007 .

[19]  Stewart Lockie,et al.  Collective Agency, Non-Human Causality and Environmental Social Movements , 2004 .

[20]  Andrew Hall,et al.  Capacity development for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: an innovation systems view of what it is and how to develop it , 2005 .

[21]  A. Hirschman,et al.  Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States , 1970 .

[22]  T. D. Mason,et al.  Land Tenure, Democracy, and Insurgency in Nepal: Peasant Support for Insurgency Versus Democracy , 2007 .

[23]  Helen Hambly Odame,et al.  Multi-stakeholder deliberation on dialectical divides: an operational principle of the systems of innovation , 2006 .