How to predict fine resolution occupancy from coarse occupancy data

1. The area of occupancy (AOO) is a widely used index in conservation assessments, notably in criteria B2 of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) red‐list. However, IUCN guidelines require assessing AOO at finer resolution than is generally available. For this reason, extrapolation techniques have been proposed to predict finer AOO from coarser resolution data. 2. Here, we apply 10 published downscaling models to the distributions of a large number of plant and bird species' in contrasting landscapes. We further compare the output of two ensemble models, one relying on all 10 downscaling models and one a subset of five models that can be fit rapidly and robustly, with minimal oversight required. We further compare the accuracy of downscaled predictions with respect to species prevalence. 3. Across all landscapes and taxa, the models predicted AOO consistently. Some, such as the power law and Hui models, were nonlinear with respect to species prevalence. Some models consistently over or under predicted, such as the Nachman and Poisson models. Furthermore, some models proved to give more variable predictions than other models, e.g. Nachman and power law. For these reasons, none of these models are suitable for downscaling if used individually. The Thomas model was also rejected, because it is too computationally intensive, even though its predictions are relatively unbiased. The most effective model, when used by itself, was the improved binomial model. However, the two ensemble models were able to provide accurate predictions of AOO with low variability compared to using any one single model. There was no significant loss in performance using the simpler ensemble model, and therefore this solution is the least computationally intensive and requires least user oversight. 4. Our results show that downscaling models could be potential tools to reliably estimate AOO for conservation assessments. Under circumstances where there is no a priori reason to prefer one model over another then an ensemble of these models may be the best solution for batch analysis of IUCN status under criteria B2. Moreover, we foresee the use of downscaling for the production of other biodiversity indicators, such as for invasive species monitoring.

[1]  K. Gaston,et al.  The sizes of species’ geographic ranges , 2009 .

[2]  Cang Hui,et al.  Extrapolating population size from the occupancy-abundance relationship and the scaling pattern of occupancy. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[3]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Measuring geographic range sizes , 1994 .

[4]  Kevin J Gaston,et al.  Estimating Species Abundance from Occurrence , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[5]  C. Hui,et al.  Capturing the “droopy-tail” in the occupancy–abundance relationship , 2007 .

[6]  Sandro Azaele,et al.  Can coarse‐grain patterns in insect atlas data predict local occupancy? , 2014 .

[7]  Ben Scott,et al.  Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool , 2011, ZooKeys.

[8]  R. Dennis,et al.  Bias in Butterfly Distribution Maps: The Influence of Hot Spots and Recorder's Home Range , 2000, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[9]  Kevin J Gaston,et al.  Occupancy, Spatial Variance, and the Abundance of Species , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[10]  Fangliang He,et al.  Modeling spatial aggregation of finite populations. , 2010, Ecology.

[11]  G. Nachman,et al.  A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF THE FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DENSITY AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF A POPULATION , 1981 .

[12]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  How Large Is a Species' Geographic Range? , 1991 .

[13]  Cang Hui,et al.  A spatially explicit approach to estimating species occupancy and spatial correlation. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[14]  Sandro Azaele,et al.  Downscaling species occupancy from coarse spatial scales. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[15]  W. Kunin,et al.  Extrapolating species abundance across spatial scales , 1998, Science.

[16]  N. Isaac,et al.  Beyond maps: a review of the applications of biological records , 2015 .

[17]  Xavier Pons,et al.  Modelling invasive alien species distributions from digital biodiversity atlases. Model upscaling as a means of reconciling data at different scales , 2012 .

[18]  Anne Bowser,et al.  Building essential biodiversity variables (EBVs) of species distribution and abundance at a global scale , 2018, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[19]  Mats Gyllenberg,et al.  Uniting Two General Patterns in the Distribution of Species , 1997, Science.

[20]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  On species occupancy-abundance models , 2002 .

[21]  David H. Wright,et al.  Correlations between incidence and abundance are expected by chance , 1991 .

[22]  Cang Hui,et al.  On the scaling patterns of species spatial distribution and association. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  Ruben Van De Kerchove,et al.  Tracking Invasive Alien Species (TrIAS): Building a data-driven framework to inform policy , 2017 .

[24]  Characterisation of false-positive observations in botanical surveys , 2017, PeerJ.

[25]  Charles J. Marsh,et al.  downscale: An R Package for Downscaling Species Occupancy from Coarse-Grain Data to Predict Occupancy at Fine-Grain Sizes , 2018 .

[26]  J. Harte,et al.  Biodiversity scales from plots to biomes with a universal species-area curve. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[27]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Effects of scale and habitat on the relationship between regional distribution and local abundance , 1990 .